MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930902251 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3758367

Star Formation in the Galactic Ecosystem

2019· article· en· W6930902251 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic diversity and population structure
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStar formationGalaxyGalaxy formation and evolutionProtogalaxyStar (game theory)Interstellar medium

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the next decade, the Canadian community will play a leading role in answering key questions about the interaction between star formation and galaxy evolution. These opportunities flow from a productive decade since LRP 2010 that has yielded new insights into the connections between how stars form and their local galactic environment. All these past and future advances have capitalized upon a broad suite of instrumental access from the long-wavelength radio to the ultraviolet. Galaxy evolution and star formation have traditionally been distinct subfields within astronomy, but the work since LRP 2010 has shown that the two are intimately connected. The buildup of the star forming main sequence and quenching of galaxies are both driven by star formation. Reciprocally, studies have also revealed that a galaxy's mass and morphology regulate the efficiency of ongoing star formation within it. These variations in efficiency are only now being clearly linked to changes in the properties of the star forming molecular medium and the conditions in the galactic interstellar medium. Over the next ten years, we will make a physically motivated connection between star formation and the broader galactic environment. This work focuses around five key questions and the survey-driven approaches that will enable Canadian researchers to come to clear answers over the next decade: How are ISM conditions and individual star formation events influenced by the galactic environment? We are carrying out the surveys of galaxy populations needed to make a census of ISM conditions across a statistically significant number of galaxies. These focus on careful work in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies where individual star formation events can be discerned. What processes regulate the formation of the molecular ISM and its organization into massive structures? Surveying a broad range of galactic environments is also a key data set for addressing this question, but this must also be done using new tracers to access obscured physics. Specifically, we will need good access to the submillimetre so we can execute high quality polarization measurements for studying the magnetic field and fine structure lines ([CI], [OI], [CII]) to trace the material being channeled into star forming clouds. What processes disrupt the neutral ISM leading to the quenching of galaxies? We will make surveys of Galactic and extragalactic star forming regions across the wavebands to calibrate how stars inject momentum and energy into their host galaxy ISM. We will establish how this feedback depends on local star formation properties, including the including cluster mass function. How does local star formation relate to the different mode of star formation seen in z>2 Universe? Studies of lensed systems, notably with ALMA, allow for resolved studies of a different mode of star formation in galactic assembly. However, these studies rely on tracers that are difficult to observe without new access to the submillimetre and far infrared. Through local mapping of the tracers typically used in high redshift studies, we can resolve how these tracers are influenced by local conditions, providing a better calibration of the properties in distant systems. How does the galactic environment predict other aspects of the star formation process beyond the star formation rate? Multiwaveband surveys will also extend our studies beyond simply answering how the star formation rate changes, turning to questions of variations in the initial mass function, the initial cluster mass function, and binary property distributions. To address these central questions in the next decade requires that we maintain and expand our access to a broad suite of observational facilities. In particular, we must remain actively engaged with ALMA, which is still in its early stages of discovery. We must also continue strong investment in high-performance computing necessary to carry out the expensive, multi-physics simulations of star formation in a galactic context. We continue to require access to single-dish radio to submillimetre facilities such as CCAT-p, the JCMT, and the GBT, and the DRAO Synthesis Telescope to carry out wide area mapping of our own Galaxy. ALMA should not be regarded as a replacement for this class of observatory. Finally, participating in next generation radio interferometers, namely the SKA and ngVLA, are needed to carry out resolved surveys of star formation and the interstellar medium beyond the nearest galaxies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,506
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,007
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetGenetic diversity and population structure→Travaux en français237 207→