MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930905915 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15021176

Euura viduata PR.

2025· article· en· W6930905915 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésType (biology)Taxonomy (biology)InvaginationHomonym (biology)Identification keyHolotype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

291 Euura viduata (Zetterstedt, 1838) Figs 306, 522–523 Tenthredo viduata Zetterstedt, 1838: 351. Lectotype designated below. Nematus striatipes Hartig, 1840: 26. Lectotype designated below. Syn. nov. Nematus lepidotus Hartig, 1840: 26. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Konow (1905b). Nematus palliceps Hartig, 1840: 25. Lectotype designated below. Syn. nov. Nematus brachyotus Förster, 1854a: 295–297. Syntypes ♀♀ (ZSM), not located. Type locality: Germany, Aachen area. Synonymy by Konow (1905b). Nematus luctuosus Förster, 1854a: 342–344. Syntypes ♀♀ (ZSM), not located. Type locality: Germany, Aachen area. Synonymy by Konow (1895). Nematus notatus Förster, 1854a: 298–299. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1941b). Nematus vagus Zaddach, 1883 in Brischke 1883: 186–187. Syntypes ♀ ♂, probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type localities: Russia, Kaliningrad [Königsberg]; Poland, Gdansk [Danzig]; Finland; Silesia. Synonymy by Konow (1895). Secondary homonym of Tenthredo vaga Fabricius, 1781 [Euura vaga]. Amauronematus viduatus var. lugens Enslin, 1915: 379. Syntypes ♀♀, not located. Type locality: not stated. Synonymy by Muche (1975). Amauronematus viduatus var. laetus Enslin, 1915: 379. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Muche (1975). Amauronematus (Brachycoluma) spaethi Liston, 2005: 272–273. Syn. nov. Diagnosis Smooth mesepisternum, at least slightly pale pronotum, hypopygium, valvifer 2, and tergum 9, pale cerci, distinctly curved lancet with 20–24 annuli and basal two annuli with rudiments of serrulae enable identification of the females. The distinctive penis valve (somewhat rectangular paravalva, large broad valvispina, distinct invagination between valvispina and ventroapical lobe of paravalva) enables reliable identification of males. The penis valve of one male (DEI-GISHym31865, Fig. 524) differs only in lacking an invagination between the valvispina and the ventroapical lobe of the paravalva. Although this specimen might represent an additional species occurring in the Alps, associated females do not seem to be morphologically distinguishable from E. viduata, nor is there a clear genetic difference. Female 4.5–6.5 mm. Head black to extensively pale around eyes; labrum pale; clypeus black to pale; supraclypeal area black to pale; antenna black; thorax black to extensively pale laterally and slightly pale dorsally; pronotum slightly to extensively pale posteriorly; tegula black to pale; pterostigma centrally paler than externally; metafemur black to pale; metatibia pale or brown; hind tarsus black or brown; abdomen mostly black to extensively pale apically, but at least hypopygium, valvifer 2 and tergum 9 slightly pale; valvula 3 black to slightly pale basally; cerci pale; mesepisternum smooth; valvula 3 of medium length, in dorsal view gradually narrowing to an acute tip. Male 4–5 mm. Head black or slightly brown around eyes; labrum black to pale; clypeus black to pale; supraclypeal area black; antenna black; thorax black; pronotum black to extensively pale; tegula black to extensively pale; pterostigma brown, sometimes centrally paler than externally; metafemur black to extensively pale; metatibia pale or brown; hind tarsus black or brown; abdomen black; sternum 9 brown or pale; mesepisternum smooth; projection of tergum 8 medium-sized. Nematus palliceps has until now mostly been placed as a synonym of Euura clitellata (Serville, 1823), e.g., by Lacourt (1999), and Taeger et al. (2010). The lectotype of N. palliceps does not disagree with the extremely brief characterisation by Hartig (1840), and bears an original cabinet label by Hartig “ palliceps ”. Confusingly, this specimen also bears determination labels by O. Conde and A. Saarinen as respectively Nematus pallicercus Hartig, 1837 and Amauronematus pallicercus (Hartig, 1837). Nematus pallicercus was treated by Konow (1905b) as a synonym of Amauronematus fallax auct. nec Lepeletier, 1823 [i.e., as a species of the Euura histrio species group], and more recently sometimes as the name of a valid species of Amauronematus, e.g., by Taeger et al. (2010). Hartig (1837) stated that the two female syntypes of N. pallicercus have a body length equivalent to that of “the preceding species” [Nematus miniatus], which is given as 3.5 lines [approximately 7.9 mm]. This is significantly larger than the 6.2 mm body length of the lectotype of N. palliceps. Neither does the colour of the abdomen of pallicercus described by Hartig fit the palliceps lectotype [translated from German]: “the dorsum of the abdomen, which is reddish-edged on the sides, is blackish rusty-brown, only the first segment is deep black” [palliceps lectotype: terga 1–8 uniformly deep black, except for their pale ventral margins]. We conclude that no type specimen of N. pallicercus exists, and because it is not possible to identify it from the description as belonging to a currently recognised taxon, that it should be treated as a species incertae sedis. Type material examined Lectotype Tenthredo viduata, here designated SWEDEN – Norrbotten • ♀; Kengis Bruk; 67.192° N, 23.506° E; MZLU, MZLU2017260. Notes The slide preparation PR.721 VV was not located. Lectotype Nematus striatipes, here designated GERMANY • ♂; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, DEI-GISHym12545. Lectotype Nematus lepidotus, here designated GERMANY • ♂; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, DEI-GISHym12544. Lectotype Nematus palliceps, here designated GERMANY • ♀; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3054. Lectotype Nematus notatus, here designated GERMANY – Nordrhein-Westfalen • ♀; Aachen area; 50.77° N, 6.09° E; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3059. Lectotype Amauronematus viduatus var. laetus, here designated GERMANY – Nordrhein-Westfalen • ♀; Crefeld [Krefeld]; Ulbricht leg.; 51.34° N, 6.58° E; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym4105. Holotype Amauronematus (Brachycoluma) spaethi FRANCE – Corsica • ♀; SW Porto Vecchio, Tamaricciu Valley; 41.57° N, 9.24° E; 20 m a.s.l.; 7 Apr. 2004; J. Späth leg.; reared ex larva on Salix atrocinerea; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym4104. Host plants A wide spectrum of Salix spp. (Taeger et al. 1998; Macek et al. 2020). Genetics COI Based on 29 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 6.09% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.82%, is Euura erecta. Nuclear Based on 24 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 1% (0.93% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.32%, is Euura viduata group specimen DEI-GISHym31865. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Morocco, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,085
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,286

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0850,034

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetCellular Mechanics and InteractionsTravaux en français237 207