MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930956494 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3815603

Pungentus marietani Altherr 1950

2013· article· en· W6930956494 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueMaterial Selection and Properties
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConoidDorsumChord (peer-to-peer)HookTaperingMerge (version control)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pungentus marietani Altherr, 1950 Figs 1 I-K, 5 P. alpinus Vinciguerra & Giannetto, 1984: 49, figs 1-3. Diagnosis This species is distinguishable by the length of its body (1.15-1.66 mm), the lip region being offset by a constriction and 11-15 μm wide, an odontostyle being 22-28 μm long and 1.9-2.3 times lip region width or 1.5-2.1% of total body length, neck length of 320-337 μm, a pharyngeal expansion 130-176 μm long or 39-43% of total neck length, a didelphic-amphidelphic female genital system, a uterus being tripartite and 56-68 µm long or 1.4-1.6 times the body diameter, V = 42-52, and the female tail being rounded conoid (19-26 μm, c = 52-74, c’ = 0.7-1.0). Material examined Five females from one location, in various states of preservation. Morphometrics See Table 1. Description Female Moderately slender to slender nematodes of medium size, 1.15-1.56 mm long. Habitus after fixation ventrally curved, especially in the posterior body region, C- or G-shaped. Body cylindrical, tapering towards the anterior end. Cuticle three-layered, especially perceptible at the tail, 1.5-2.5 μm thick in anterior region, 2.0-2.5 μm at mid-body and 4.0-5.0 μm on dorsal side of tail; outer layer with very fine transverse striation, intermediate layer thicker than the outer and inner layers. Lateral chord 5.5-7.0 µm wide or occupying 12-19% of mid-body diameter, very granular, but lacking any differentiation. Lateral pores comparatively coarse, in two rows at the margins of lateral chord; ventral pores well perceptible along entire body (Fig. 1K), apparently connecting with sub-epidermal gland bodies. Lip region offset by constriction, 2.4-2.5 times as wide as high and ca. one-third (28-35%) of body diameter at neck base. Lips moderately angular and separate; labial and cephalic papillae distinct, but not especially protruding above cephalic contour. Amphid fovea cup-shaped, opening at level of cephalic constriction, occupying 6.5 μm or about one-half (52%) of lip region diameter. Cheilostome almost cylindrical, its walls distinctly thick and sclerotized at the anterior half; perioral refractive dots or platelets very prominent. Odontostyle 10.0-12.5 times as long as wide, 1.8-2.3 times longer than lip region diameter or 1.5-2.1% of total body length; aperture 3.0-5.0 μm long or 14-19% of its length. Odontophore rodlike, almost equal (0.9-1.1 times) to odontostyle. Guiding ring double, located at 15-16 μm or 1.2-1.5 times the lip region diameter from anterior end. Pharynx enlarging gradually; basal expansion 5.7-7.1 times as long as wide and 2.9-3.7 times the corresponding body diameter long, occupying about twofifths (39-43%) of total neck length. Pharyngeal gland nuclei located as follows: DO = 52, DN = 56- 61, S 1 N 1 = 77, S 1 N 2 = 79, S 2 N = 87-90. Nerve ring at 120-128 μm from anterior end or 38% of total neck length. Cardia rounded conoid, 7-9 x 10-14 μm. Genital system didelphic-amphidelphic, with both branches well and equally developed, the anterior 169-182, the posterior 144-210 μm long. Ovaries 43- 162 μm long; oocytes first in two or more rows, then in one row. Oviduct 82-118 μm long, or 2.2-2.9 times the body diameter, consisting of a slender portion with prismatic cells and a moderately developed pars dilatata. Oviduct-uterus junction marked by a distinct sphincter. Uterus 56-68 µm long or 1.4-1.6 times the body diameter, apparently tripartite, i.e., consisting of a proximal section with thick walls and distinct lumen, an intermediate narrowing, and a spheroid pars dilatata uteri. Vagina extending inwards 18-22 μm or about one-half (44-59%) of body diameter; pars proximalis almost as long as wide, 13-18 x 12-16 μm, with convergent walls and enveloped by weak circular musculature; pars refringens not very distinct in the females examined, but two pieces might be present; pars distalis 5.5-7.0 μm long. Vulva a pre-equatorial, short transverse slit, which is preceded by a depression of body surface. Prerectum 2.9- 4.2, rectum 0.9-1.1 anal body diameters long. Tail short and rounded conoid, somewhat more straight ventrally. Caudal pores two pairs, subdorsal, at the anterior half of tail. Male Unknown. Distribution This species was collected from one location in the southern Iberian Peninsula: the province of Granada, Sierra Nevada National Park, near road to Veleta summit (37°7’ N - 3°32’ W), in association with Mediterranean brushwood Retama sphaerocarpa (Linnaeus, 1753) Boissier 1840 as dominant species. Remarks The specimens from the Iberian population of this species are nearly identical to those of the types as described by Altherr (1950a) as well as to the type material of P. alpinus Vinciguerra & Giannetto, 1984, the latter regarded as a junior synonym by Ahmad et al. (2000). Some morphological features, for instance the nature of the cuticle and the female genital system, are more accurately described here. Pungentus marietani is certainly another widely distributed species in Europe, where it has been reported from Germany (Ahmad et al. 2000), Italy (Vinciguerra & Giannetto 1984, as P. alpinus), Poland (Brzeski 1963; Wasilewska 1967; Winiszewska-Slipinska 1987a, b, but see comments below), Switzerland (Altherr 1950a) and the Netherlands (Bongers 1988, as P. alpinus). Besides, Vinciguerra (2006) mentioned its occurrence in Serbia, Slovakia, Macedonia and Canada. The true identity of the specimens studied by Winiszewska-Slipinska (1987a) remains uncertain, because of their larger general size: body 1.5-1.9 mm long (n=27) and odontostyle 28-31 µm; this material probably belongs to another species.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMaterial Selection and PropertiesTravaux en français237 207