Aphelinoidea (Lathromeroides) neomexicana
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aphelinoidea (Lathromeroides) neomexicana (Girault, 1915) (Figs 51–59) Lathromeroides neomexicanus Girault, 1915: 5. Type locality: Las Vegas, San Miguel County, New Mexico, USA.Holotype ♀ [USNM],examined(duringavisitthere). Aphelinoidea (Krygeriola) dolichoptera Nowicki, 1934: 4–5. Type locality: Parco Gussone (as “Park of the Royal Agricultural College”), Portici, Metropolian City of Naples, Campania, Italy. Holotype ♂ [DEZA],notexamined. N. syn. Aphelinoidea (Krygeriola) dolichoptera Nowicki: Nowicki 1936: 141 (illustrations of the wings of the male holotype). Lathromeroides dolichoptera (Nowicki): Nowicki 1940: 657–659 (illustrations, description of female, distribution, diagnosis); Novicky 1946: 44–46 (mentioned). Aphelinoidea dolichoptera Nowicki: Doutt & Viggiani 1968: 529 (list); Fursov 2007: 966–967 (key, distribution, illustrations); Wang et al. 2009: 315 (key); Viggiani 2011: 104–108 (list, taxonomic history, diagnosis, distribution, discussion). Aphelinoidea neomexicanus (Girault): Doutt & Viggiani 1968: 530 (list). Aphelinoidea gwaliorensis Yousuf & Shafee, 1985: 303–304. Type locality: Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.Holotype ♀ [ZDAMU],notexamined. N. syn. Aphelinoidea gwaliorensis Yousuf & Shafee: Lin 1994: 84–85 (redescription, illustrations, records from Fujian, China); Wang et al. 2009: 315 (key); Khan & Anis 2016: 90–92 (taxonomic history, diagnosis, distrubution, key), 95 (illustrations). Aphelinoidea (Lathromeroides) neomexicana (Girault): Trjapitzin 1995: 301 (host), 303–304 (key, distribution); Walker et al. 2005: 9 (list); Pinto 2006: 88 (list). Aphelinoidea (Lathromeroides) dolichoptera Nowicki: Trjapitzin 1995: 304 (key, distribution); Hu & Lin 2005: 150 (key), 151–152 (redescription, distribution, illustrations) [as A. dolichoptera (Novicky)]. Diagnosis: Female (specimens from the Nearctic). Body length 600–1185 µm (dry-mounted specimens). Face brown, vertex yellow, gena brownish (Fig. 51); mesonotum pale or bright yellow except propodeum a little darker (often orange- brown), or mesoscutum sometimes mostly orange; gaster either uniformly dark brown or sometimes with several pale or orange transverse stripes. Antenna (Fig. 52) with clava 2.2–3.1× as long as wide, its apical segment 1.2–1.8× length of basal segment. Fore wing (Fig. 55) 2.3–2.4× as long as wide, with disc setose beyond venation; marginal vein thickened. Hind wing (Fig. 56) with 3 or 4 rows of discal setae. Gaster elongate; ovipositor occupying usually about 0.9× of its entire length (arising from base of second gastral tergum, Fig. 53) but sometimes its entire length or, occasionally, slightly projecting forward underneath mesosoma up to about middle of scutellum (Fig. 54), 3.0–3.9× length of metatibia, exserted a little beyond gastral apex; hypopygium extending to apex of gaster (Fig. 51). Male (specimens from the Holarctic). Body length 560–850 µm (dry-mounted specimens). Antenna as in Fig. 57 and genitalia as in Fig. 58. Clava 2.4–2.9× as long as wide; fore wing (Fig. 59) 2.3–2.4× as long as wide. Also see the descriptions of the male of A. dolichoptera (Nowicki 1934, 1936) and the consequent description of the female (Nowicki 1940), as well as the important corrections to its diagnosis by Viggiani (2011). Material examined (all in UCRC): Kyrgyzstan: 1♂, Naryn, ArpaValley, 40°47'40"N 74°41'37"E, 2810 m, 18.vii.2000, C.H. Dietrich; 1♂, Osh, Ikizyak River, 39°42'51"N 73°46'30"E, 3100 m, 9.vii.2000, C.H. Dietrich. Canada: 2♀, Alberta, 16 km S of Magrath, McIntyre Ranch, 19–21. vi.1990, 26.viii–9.vi.1990,D. Griffiths; 2♀ 1♂, WritingonStone Provintial Park, 24–30.viii.1990 (1♀ 1♂), 30.viii–10.ix.1990 (1♀),M. Klassen; 1♀, Yukon,Herschel Island, 24.viii.1971, W.R. M. Mason. Costa Rica: 1♀, Guanacaste,SantaRosaNationalPark, Hacienda, 29.xi–20.xii.1986. USA: Arizona: 1♀, CoconinoCounty,13mi.SofJakobLake,2682m, 26.vi.1993,J.D. Pinto; 1♀, LaPaz County, 34°17'15"N 114°04'54"W,185m, 21.iii.2003,D. Yanega; California: 1♀, ImperialCounty, 4mi.WofHwy86onHwy78, 17.iii.1992,J.D. Pinto; 1♀ 2♂, InyoCounty, Shoshone, 21.v.1991, J.D. Pinto; Riverside County: 1♀, Menifee Valley, 33°39'N 117°13'W, 508 m, 19.vii–1.viii.1995, J.D. Pinto; 2♀, SanJacintoMountains, TamarackValley,2780m, 13–17.viii.2001,J.D. Pinto, G.R. Platner; San Bernardino County: 1♀ 2♂, Clark Mountains, 35°31'18"N 115°38'34"W, 1390 m, 23.v.2001 (1♀ 1♂), 35°31'45"N 115°38'15"W,1490m, 21.v.2001 (1♂),J.D. Pinto; 1♀, 14mi.Nof29 Palms, 12.iv.1984, J.T. Huber; 5♀ 1♂, JackandMarilynSweeneyGraniteMountainsDesertResearch Center, GraniteCove, 34°48'N 115°39'W, 14–17.v.1994,J.D. Pinto, G.R. Platner; 1♀, SanBernardino Mountains,Road2N931mi.NofHighway38,2350m, 24.vi.1997,J.D. Pinto; 1♀, SanGorgonio Wilderness, Fish Creek Trail, 20.vi.1984, J.T. Huber; Michigan: 1♀ 2♂, ClintonCounty,BathCharter Township(nearRoseLake), 42°47'55.5"N 84°22'50.8"W,259m(canopytrapinblacklocusttrees, Robinia pseudoacacia), 15.ix.2015 (1♂), 6.x.2015 (1♀ 1♂),T. Petrice; Missouri: 3♀, WayneCounty, Williamsville, 10–20.ix.1987, 21.x–11.xi.1987, 20.ix–20.x.1988, J.T. Becker; Oregon: 1♂, Harney County, Fifteen Cent Lake (NE end), 10.vii.1999,J.D. Pinto; 1♀, Malheur County, 4.5 mi. W of Jordan Valley, 11.vii.1999, J.D. Pinto; Texas: 2♀ 1♂, BrazosCounty, CollegeStation,LickCreek Park, 30.vii.1987, J.B. Woolley(1♀), 26.viii.1987, J.B. Woolley,G.Zolnerowich(1♀ 1♂); 4♀ 3♂, BrewsterCounty,BigBendNationalPark, 29°34'02"N 103°16'04"W, 17–21.iii.1992, J.B. Woolley,R. Wharton; 1♀ 1♂, BurnetCounty,InksLakeStatePark, 22.iii.1986, J.B. Woolley,G. Zolnerowich; 3♀ 2 ♂, HidalgoCounty,BentsenRioGrandeValleyStatePark, 19.vi.1986, J.B. Woolley; 2♀ 4♂, Jim WellsCounty,WofBenBolt,LaCopitaResearchStation, 20.v.1987, J.B. Woolley(1♀), 23.iii.1990, G.Zolnerowich(2♂), 24.iii.1990,G.Zolnerowich(1♀ 2♂); 2♀ 5♂, PresidioCounty,BigBendRanch State Park: 29°26'18"N 103°54'24"W, 19.v.1990,G. Zolnerowich (1♀), 2.8 mi. E of La Sauceda, 27–28.iv.1991, G. Zolnerowich (3♂), 29°30'45"N 103°51'56"W, 7–9.viii.1991, J.B. Woolley, G. Zolnerowich (1♀ 2♂); 1♀ 1♂, Robertson County, 8mi.E of Hearne,M. Hallmark, 3–27.x.1990 (1♀), 10–17.xi.1990 (1♂); Utah: 3♀, GarfieldCounty,7.2mi.SofTicaboo,CaneSpringsDesert, 20.v.1995,J.D. Pinto; 24♀ 10♂, WayneCounty:6mi.WofCaineville, 29.vi.1993,J.D.Pinto(1♀); SE of Hanksville, 38°20.26'N 110°41.26'W, 9–10.v.2000, J.D.Pinto (7♀ 4♂), 13–14.x.2002, J.D. Pinto(8♀), 25–26.vii.2004,J.D.&D.G.Pinto(8♀ 6♂). Distribution: Austria (Novicky 1946 [as A. dolichoptera]), China (Fijian (Lin 1994 [as A. gwaliorensis] and Xinjiang [Hu & Lin 2005 [as A. dolichoptera]), Croatia, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Ukraine (Nowicki 1934, 1936, 1940; Trjapitzin 1995; Fursov 2007; Viggiani 2011 [as A. dolichoptera]), India (Yousuf & Shafee 1985; Khan & Anis 2016 [as A. gwaliorensis]), and USA (Girault 1915; Trjapitzin 1995), as well as Canada, Costa Rica, and Kyrgyzstan (new records). Hosts: Unknown. This species was reared in New Mexico, USA, from eggs of a leafhopper (jassid) (Girault 1915). Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) sariq Triapitsyn & Rakitov, 2013 Aphelinoidea sp.: Rakitov & Appel 2012: 10–12, 16, 18 (host association, natural history information, illustrations). Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) sariq Triapitsyn & Rakitov in Rakitov & Triapitsyn, 2013: 539 (key), 540–543. Type locality:Ecocenter “Dzheyran”, 39.5789°N 64.7230°E, 224 m, Kagan Distr., BukharaProv., Uzbekistan.Holotype ♀ [UCRC],examined(Rakitov&Triapitsyn2013). Diagnosis: Member of the plutella species group of the nominate subgenus of Aphelinoidea. Body mostly yellow. Also see Rakitov and Triapitsyn (2013). Distribution: Uzbekistan. Host: Scenergates viridis (Vilbaste) (Cicadellidae) (Rakitov & Appel 2012 [as Aphelinoidea sp.]; Rakitov & Triapitsyn 2013).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».