MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931075349 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4570957

Lycopodina hystrix Ekins & Erpenbeck & Goudie & Hooper 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6931075349 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParatypeHolotypeSuckerRetractSingle specimenTable (database)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lycopodina hystrix sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 0D895565-2580-4D22-9916-22BA8FD4BECE Lycopodina sp. 1, Ekins, Erpenbeck & Hooper, 2020: Table 14. Material Examined: Holotype: SAMA S2599, Yatala Canyon, Commonwealth Marine Reserve, Great Australian Bight, South Australia, VSM 02, 34 o 47’ 57” S 131 o 45’ 20” E, 1393 m, Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV), Coll. CSIRO on RV Rem Etive, Cruise RE2017 _ CO1, Sample VSM02 _014_105, 17 March 2017. Paratype: SAMA S2600 same collection data as SAMA S2599, Sample VSM02 _014_106, 17 March 2017. Paratype: SAMA S3559 same collection data as SAMA S2599, Sample VSM02 _014_105.1, 17 March 2017. Distribution: Endemic to the Great Australian Bight, South Australia, bathyal depth. Etymology: L. hystrix, porcupine, named for its spiky appearance. Description. Growth form: Erect, clavate-shaped body, with a very hispid array of filaments arising at all angles from the body, supported by a short stem and disc-shaped basal attachment (Fig. 7 A). The holotype, SAMA S2599, measures 18 mm in total length, with the sponge body 6 mm diameter, 9 mm long, and 3.4 mm in depth. The filaments extend for at least 4.5 mm from the body. Paratype SAMA S3559 is attached to a piece of Madrepora oculata Linnaeus, 1758, and has a total length of 7 mm, with the remains of the body only 2 mm in length, and the filaments extend 2 mm away from the body. Paratype SAMA S2600 has a total length of 10 mm, body 2 mm wide, 6 mm long and external filaments of almost 3 mm. Colour: On-deck the body, stem, basal disc and base of the filaments were white, with the tips of the filaments appearing to have red and orange colouring, mostly due to detritus. After preservation in ethanol the sponges were cream in colour. Ectosomal skeleton: A thin membranous ectosome covers all of the sponge, with anisochelae found only in the ectosome of the main body. Endosomal skeleton: The skeleton consists of several bundles of longitudinal styles forming the central axis. These extend from the base of the stem to the top of the sponge body (Fig. 7 N–O). At right angles to the core bundles are very long filaments several times longer than the width of the body. These consist of styles not only at right angles to the body but also buttressed by styles at an acute angle to the filaments (Fig. 7 O). The basal attachment has echinating styles extending through the ectosome (Figure 7 P). Megascleres: Megascleres consist of five categories of styles-tylostyles. Mycalostyles 1 of the body, filaments and stem have long tapering points and gradually tapering bases, with the thickest part of the spicule approximately one third towards the basal end. Oxeote styles 2 are nearly anisoxeote, with the basal end rapidly tapering to nearly a point. Styles echinating the base of the stem and basal disc range from small tylostyles 3, small styles 4, large, thin styles 5, and in one specimen only strongyles (see Table 3). Microscleres: The microscleres consist of a single size class of palmate anisochelae and forceps. The anisochelae has a single upper large frontal alae nearly completely detached from the two lateral alae which are completely fused to the shaft, and two smaller lower alae nearly completely fused. The lower alae also has three blunt teeth with a central dominant tooth, and the other small alae directly behind it has four blunt teeth, arranged in pairs of unequal sizes. Chelae are 10.5–16 µm long. Forceps ribbon-shaped with tight central curvature expanding out to wider curvature approximately one third along the basal end, dimensions 30–51 x 3–11 µm (see Table 3). Rare sigmancistras 9–13 x 0.1–1.3 µm (see Table 3). Molecular data: We were unable to obtain sufficient material for DNA analysis. Remarks: Amongst the fifteen current species of Lycopodina that have forceps (see Ekins, Erpenbeck & Hoop- er 2020), this new species is closest to L. occidentalis (Lambe, 1893) from the Pacific coast of Canada in skeletal structure with multiple axial bundles, having different morphologies of styles localised to different regions of the sponge, and the size of anisochelae and forceps. However, L. hystrix sp. nov. has a very different clavate morphology than the stipitate L. occidentalis, and different megasclere geometries. With the exclusion of the forceps this species otherwise resembles the descriptions of L. callithrix (Hentschel, 1914) from Antarctica as redescribed by Goodwin et al. (2017), although this new species has a distinct ectosomal skeleton, differentiated spicule localisation, and lacks the very long 2–4 mm styles/subtylostyles that characterise L. callithrix. The new species also differs from L. helios Ekins, Erpenbeck & Hooper, 2020 by possession of forceps, being at least twice its size, having an elongated shaped body, and most obviously by the concentrated radial spikes, which in L. hystrix sp. nov. are easily the size of the body, whilst those of L. helios, only just emerge slightly from the ectosome of the body.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,074

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→Travaux en français237 207→