Trogon chrysochloros PELZELN 1856
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
TROGON CHRYSOCHLOROS PELZELN, 1856 Proposed English name: Southern black-throated trogon. Trogon chrysochloros Pelzeln J., 1856, Sitz. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, XX, Heft 2, pp. 496–498, 505–506, Ypanema (= Ipanema), São Paulo, Brazil. – Pothinus atricollis Cabanis & Heine, 1862 –1863, Mus. Hein., part IV, pp. 180–181. – Trogon chrysochloros Pelzeln J, 1868, Zur Orn. Bras., pp. 226–331 (reiteration of species description with additional specimens from Nas Lagos, São Paulo). – Trogon atricollis chrysochloros Berlepsch & Ihering, 1885, Zeitschr. ges. Ornithol., 2, p. 160, Taquara (Rio Grande do Sul). – Trogon atricollis (Race A) Grant, 1892, Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., 17, pp. 455–458, Nova Friburgo (Rio de Janeiro), Ipanema (São Paulo) and Rio Grande do Sul. – Trogon atricollis Ihering, 1898, Rev. Mus. Paul. III, p. 294, São Sebastão and Iquape (São Paulo). – Trogon splendidus Bertoni 1901. Av. Nuev. Paraguay, 1901, p. 35, Alto Paraná, Paraguay. – Trogon atricollis chrysochloros Hellmayr, 1906, Novit. Zool., 13, p. 380. – Trogon atricollis Ihering & Ihering, 1907, Part. Catal. Fauna Brasil., I, Aves, p. 158, from Rio Grande do Sul to Central America, including specimens from Espirito Santo (Rio Doce). – Trogonurus curucui curucui Ridgway, 1911, Bull. Un. St. Nat. Mus. 50 (5), p. 764. – Trogon rufus Snethlage, 1914, Part. Bol. Mus. Goeldi. 8, p. 208. – Trogonurus curucui curucui Cory, 1919, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser., 13, p. 325. – Trogon curucui curucui Sztolcman, 1926, Annal. Zool. Mus. Polon. Hist. Natur., 5, p. 133, Vermelho and Terezina (Paraná). – Trogonurus rufus chrysochloros Stone, 1928, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 80, p. 158. – Trogon curucui curucui Pinto, 1932, Rev. Mus. Paul. 17, p. 50, Valparaiso (western São Paulo). – Trogon curucui curucui Pinto, 1935, Rev. Mus. Paul. 19, p. 144, Rio Jucurucú (S Bahia). – Trogon curucui chrysochloros Pinto, 1935. Rev. Mus. Paul. 19, p. 144, São Paulo. – Trogonurus rufus rufus Pinto, 1938, Rev. Mus. Paul. 22, p. 289. – Trogon curucui chrysochloros Griscom & Greenway, 1941, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 88, pp. 180–181. – Trogon rufus chrysochloros Todd, 1943, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 56, p. 11. – Trogon rufus chrysochloros Peters, 1945, Check-list of Birds of the World, Vol 5, p. 157, Southern Brazil from Bahia to São Paulo and east to Mato Grosso; Paraguay and Misiones (Argentina). – Trogonurus rufus rufus Camargo, 1946, Papéis Avulsos do Dept. de Zool. 7 (5), pp. 147, 157, Boracéia (S. Paulo). – Trogon rufus chrysochloros Zimmer, 1948, American Museum Novitates (1380), pp. 26–31. – Trogon rufus chrysochloros Pinto, 1950, Papeíes Avilsos de Zoologia, 9(9), pp. 89–136. – Trogon rufus chrysochloros Pinto 1978. Novo Catal. das Aves do Brasil, 1a Parte, p. 218, Paraguay, Misiones (Argentina) and Brazil from S Bahia to Rio Grande do Sul, including Minas Gerais. Diagnosis: Both sexes are markedly larger with a relatively smaller and more highly serrated bill than all other taxa. The blue, blue-grey, grey or white eye-ring is diagnostic against T. sulphureus, T. r. amazonicus and T. cupreicauda. Males: The undertail and wing panel barring are diagnostic against all other taxa due to their distinctly high density and narrow white bars, whilst the undertail barring also has a higher percentage area black. Compared to T. r. rufus and T. r. amazonicus, the undertail black bars are also slightly broader overall. The uppertail hue is generally higher than in T. r. rufus but lower than in amazonicus. Compared to T. r. sulphureus, the uppertail is less coppery, whilst the black bar widths on the wing panel and, to a lesser extent, undertail are narrower. Possession of a breast band also distinguishes T. chrysochloros from T. r. sulphureus and T. r. amazonicus. Against T. tenelllus, the undertail barring has narrower black bars, whilst the wing panel barring has broader black bars and a higher percentage area black. Compared to T. cupreicauda, the uppertail is generally less coppery, undertail and wing panel black bars generally narrower and wing panel percentage area black greater. In mountainous and southern regions the chest is also usually less bright than other taxa and generally bluer than T. tenellus, T. cupreicauda and T. r. amazonicus. Females: Wing coverts more densely barred than all other taxa. However, this is only generally the case against T. r. rufus, from which they differ further by generally possessing narrower black bars on the wing panel, denser undertail barring, a yellower and lighter head, yellower and less saturated mantle, and yellower and duller chest. The uppertail is also more saturated compared to northern individuals of T. r. rufus. Compared to T. r. sulphureus, they have narrower black bars, often a yellower and brighter head, yellower but less saturated mantle, and generally more saturated and lighter chest, which is also slightly more often yellower. Against T. r. amazonicus, they have a greater percentage area black and narrower black bars on the wing panel, less saturated and more frequently yellower-brown and lighter head, more frequently less saturated and yellower mantle, and duller chest. Compared to T. r. tenellus, the undertail and wing panel barring have a greater percentage area black and broader black bars, the head is usually less saturated, and chest usually yellower and less saturated. Against T. r. cupreicauda, they lack the extensive brown undertail wash, possess a greater percentage area black on the undertail barring, and usually has a brighter, more yellow head, yellower mantle, and yellower, often more saturated and slightly brighter chest. Song: More notes per phrase, faster pace, shorter note durations and pause following introductory note, as well as higher note frequencies and wider introductory note bandwidth than T. rufus subspecies. The greater number of notes per phrase, faster pace and shorter durations are also diagnostic against T. tenellus. Compared to T. cupreicauda, the pace is faster, the pause duration shorter and frequencies usually higher. Habitat and distribution: Primary and secondary Atlantic Forest from Bahia state (south of the Rio São Francisco) to Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil, Misiones province (and likely also north-eastern Corrientes), Argentina, and eastern Paraguay. Up to an elevation of 1600 m. Type material: Syntypes: NMW 40731 (adult male) and NMW 54701 (subadult female), collected by Natterer at Ypanema (now Fazenda Ipanema), Iperó, São Paulo, Brazil. Description: Both sexes distinctly larger than all other taxa, with highly serrated bill. Although the bill is also generally narrower than all other taxa, besides males of T. r. amazonicus, it appears smaller relative to the larger body. Males: The uppertail is mostly shiny olive-green but varies between plain green to slightly coppery-green. Head and mantle coppery-green. Rump usually plain-green. Upperchest distinctly less brilliant than in other taxa. However, the hue of the iridescent plumage decreases overall with increasing elevation (Supporting Information, Fig. S2), varying from more coppery heads and mantles and goldengreen rumps and chests at lower elevations (c. <550 m above sea level) to plainer-green heads and mantles and blue-green rumps and chests in mountainous regions (c.> 550 m above sea levels). This is somewhat also linked to latitude, with northern birds having the warmest coloration and those from mountainous areas in the south, the bluest. Belly yellow. Breast band usually present, often inconspicuous and difficult to detect, sometimes consisting of only a few white flecks, but uncommonly completely absent. Undertail and wing panels with exceptionally dense barring and narrow white bars, relatively narrow black bars and high percentage areas black. Moderately wide terminal tailband. Females: Head is usually poorly saturated, lighter and yellower Dark Brown to Dark Yellowish Brown. Mantle usually poorly saturated, yellowish Dark Olive Brown. Chest usually moderately saturated, lighter to darker Olive Brown to Dark Olive Brown. Belly yellow. Uppertail typically saturated Dark Reddish Brown, occasionally with yellower or redder hues. The brown wash on the undertail is mostly absent and less often restricted to the base of the rectrices or edging the black patch at the base of the rectrices (not visible in natural position). Undertail and wing-panel barring densities high with narrow black and light brown bars. Percentage area black moderate on undertail and generally high on wing panel. Bareparts: In males, eye-rings typically blue with minorities blue-grey or white. Tarsi, usually bluegrey, less often grey or sometimes pink to purplishgrey or olive. In females, eye-rings typically blue-grey, sometimes blue and rarely grey. Tarsi blue-grey, pink to purplish-grey or grey, less often olive. Song: Distinctive song with a high number of notes per phrase, fast pace, moderate introductory note and relatively short loudsong note durations, short pause after the introductory note, high introductory note frequencies, low loudsong note frequencies, moderately wide introductory note bandwidth and wide loudsong note bandwidths.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».