Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paragrallomyia albibasis (Enderlein, 1922) (Figs. 6–9) Grallomya albibasis Enderlein 1922: 216 (genus spelled Grallomyia). Taeniaptera albibasis (Enderlein), Hennig 1934: 83, Steyskal, 1968: 16, Ferro & Carvalho 2014: 60. Paragrallomyia albibasis (Enderlein), Jackson et al. 2015: 14. Taeniaptera parens Cresson 1926: 273, Cresson, 1930: 352, Steyskal 1968: 18. New synonym Paragrallomyia parens (Cresson), Jackson et al. 2015: 14. Description: Body length 6 mm; wing 4 mm. Head and abdomen black, thorax black. Palpus dark brown except for white outer face. Clypeus brown with sparse pale microsetulae. First flagellomere dark brown. Fronto-orbital plate dark brown. Row of katepisternal setae brownish. Fore tibia dark brown. Fore tarsus mostly white, tarsomere one brown on basal half only. Hind femur mostly brown, white on basal quarter and with a small angled preapical white ring. Tergites black. Oviscape black. Head: First flagellomere covered by pale microsetulae. Frontal vitta with a darkened spot anterior to ocellar plate. Frontal vitta flat, not swollen anterior to ocellar plate. Epicephala converging, not immediately merging posterior to ocellar plate (Fig. 6). Epicephalon somewhat swollen above frontal vitta level. Thorax: Mesonotum with lines of thin brownish microsetulae. Anterior half of postpronotal lobe bare. Femora covered with sparse black microsetulae. Mid and hind tibia almost cylindrical, sulcus on outer face weak. Female cervical sclerite with a whitish oval swelling, male cervical sclerite smooth. Cell r 4+5 open at the tip of the wing. Abdomen: Pleural membrane greyish with a white vertical stripe on P3. Female abdomen: Single spermathecal duct apically swollen. Single spermatheca cylindrical, with sparse small rounded finger-like processes (Fig. 7). Paired spermathecal duct uniformly thick. Paired spermathecal duct stems tapered on apical third, followed by a disc-shaped swelling and a broader apical half. Paired spermathecae oval and with an apical nipple-like swelling, invaginated apically. Male abdomen: Copulatory fork with small inner basal lobes, less than half as long as the arms. Ejaculatory apodeme smaller than epandrium and with a very small blade, length subequal to sperm pump. Phallapodeme short, not extending to anterior limit of hypandrium. Distiphallus long, longer than epandrium; phallic bulb subequal in length and width. Distal distiphallus short and thin, 1/4 of length and almost half of width of basal distiphallus (Fig. 9). Type material: Syntype of Grallomya albibasis: GUATEMALA. Tumbador. VII and VIII.1912 (1 ♀, ZMHB examined); Holotype of Taeniaptera parens (1 ♂, ANSP, 6310, not examined). Material examined: BELIZE. Cayo Dist., San Ignacio, Maya Mt. Lodge, 17º 9’ N 89º4’W, dung trap, 7– 8.I.1991, S. A. Marshall (3 ♀ DEBU00151700, DEBU00151709; DEBU00151715); COLOMBIA. Chocó, Ensenada de Utria Natl. Pk., Cocalito, 0–100 m, canopy trap, 4–19.VII.2000, J. Pérez (3 ♀, DEBU00138518, DEBU00138519, DEBU00138522, IAVH); Chocó, Ensenada de Utria Natl. Pk., Cocalito, 0–100 m, Malaise trap, 4–19.VII.2000, J. Pérez (3 ♀, DEBU00138433, DEBU00138491, DEBU00138492, IAVH); Chocó, PNN Utriá, Cocalito, 6º01’ N 77º20’ W, 20 m, Malaise, 19–27.VII.2000, M. 334, J. Pérez (1 ♀, IAVH); Chocó, PNN Utriá, Cocalito, 6º01’ N 77º20’ W, 20 m, Malaise, 16.VIII–7.IX.2000, M. 814, J. Pérez (1 ♀, IAVH); Chocó, PNN Utriá, Cocalito, 6º01’ N 77º20’ W, 20 m, Malaise, 16.VIII–7.IX.2000, M. 819, J. Pérez (1 ♀, IAVH); Putumayo, PNN La Paya Cabaña Viviano, bosque ripario, 0º7’ S 74º56’ W, 320 m, 19.IX–1.X.2001, Malaise, R. Cobete, M. 2440 (1 ♀, IAVH); Putumayo, PNN La Paya Cabaña Viviano, 0º7’ S 74º56’ W, 320 m, 30.XI–15.XII.2001, Malaise, E. Lazano, M. 2794 (1 ♀, IAVH); Valle Del Cauca, PNN Farallones de Cali Anchicaya, 3º26’ N 76º48’ W, 730 m, Malaise, 30.I–13.II.2000, M. 1111, S. Sarria (1 ♀, IAVH); Valle Del Cauca, PNN Farallones de Cali Anchicaya, 3º26’ N 76º48’ W, 730 m, Malaise, 25.X–8.XI.2000, M. 1111, S. Sarria (1 ♀, IAVH); COSTA RICA. Alajuela, Biol. Res. San Ramón, 900 m, II. III.2000, P. Hanson (2 ♀, DEBU00138164, DEBU00138166, MNCR); Alajuela, Volcan Tenorio, N slope nr. Bijagua Biol. Sta., 700 m, rain forest, 19. VI.2000, rain forest, S. A. Marshall (1 ♀, DEBU00138366, MNCR); Alajuela, Volcan Tenorio, N slope nr. Bijagua Biol. Sta., 700 m, rain forest, 16–20. VI.2000, S. A. Marshall (2 ♂, DEBU00118469, DEBU00118493); Alajuela, Volcan Tenorio N slope trail to laguna, 800–900 m, rain forest, 16–20. VI.2000, S. A. Marshall (3♀, DEBU00118539, DEBU00118540, DEBU00118547, MNCR); Alajuela, San Ramon Biol. Res., 900 m, V.2000, P. Hanson (3 ♀, DEBU00206264, DEBU00206269, DEBU00206280); Puntarenas, Corcovado Natl. Pk., San Pedrillo, 5-50 m, 8º 37’15” N 83º44’06 E, 13.VIII.2001, S. A. Marshall (1 ♀, DEBU00168167); Puntarenas, Corcovado Natl. Pk., San Pedrillo, 5-50 m, 8º 37’15” N 83º44’06 E, on foliage, 13.VIII.2001, M. Buck (1 ♀, DEBU00168187); MEXICO. Vera Cruz, 33 km NE Catemaco, Los Tuxitas Biol. Sta., ridge rainforest, FIT, 160 m, 1.VII–1.VIII.1983, S. & J. Peck (2 ♀, 1 ♂, DEBU). Distribution: Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico. Comments: P. albibasis is recognized by the somewhat elevated black epicephalon that contrasts with the brownish and deep frontal vitta. The convergence of the epicephalon plates (not immediately merging) posterior to the ocellar plate and the single spermatheca with sparse small rounded finger-like processes (Fig. 7) are also characteristic for the species. Our material from Brazil was limited but we have seen no verifiable specimens of this species from this country, and we suspect that records of P. albibasis from Brazil noted by Hennig (1934), and repeated by Steyskal (1968) and Ferro & Carvalho (2014) are misidentifications. Cresson (1926) described Taeniaptera parens as a new species, even though he recognized that it was probably a junior synonym of Grallomya albibasis, because he couldn’t verify the number of dorsocentral setae in G. albibasis. Since the type specimen of G. albibasis has two dorsocentral setae as in described for T. parens, and no other characters suggest that these species are different, T. parens is treated as a junior synonym of P. albibasis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».