MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931238465 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6233301

Boreodromia bicolor Loew

2008· article· en· W6931238465 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueen (butterfly)Thorax (insect anatomy)GenusType speciesSingle specimenWhite (mutation)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Boreodromia bicolor (Loew) (Figs. 1–3, 8) Synamphotera bicolor Loew, 1863: 18. Sciodromia bicolor: Coquillett, 1900: 423 (Alaskan record). Synamphotera bicolor: Melander, 1902: 231 (redescription). Boreodromia bicolor: Coquillett, 1903: 247 (new genus). Boreomyia bicolor: Aldrich, 1905: 316 (catalogue record, genus name error). Type material examined. LECTOTYPE (here designated), male labelled: “524”; “Loew.”; “ Type / 13088 [red label with upper white border] [only thorax and abdomen remaining]” (MCZ). My lectotype label “LEC- TOTYPE/ of Synamphotera / bicolor Loew / des. B.J. Sinclair 1992 [red label]” has been attached to this specimen. PARALECTOTYPE: Same data as lectotype [only thorax and abdomen remaining] (1 &, MCZ). My paralectotype label has additionally been attached to this specimen. Additional material examined (440 specimens). CANADA. British Columbia: Abbotsford, 27.vi.1952, W.R.M. Mason (CNC); Bear Lk, Crooked R. Prov. Pk, 16.viii.1978, PHA (USNM); Culculz Lk., 2,20,25. vii.1948, H.R. Foxlee (CNC); Cassiar Hwy, 353 mi, Moose Meadows Resort, 2.viii.1996, PHA (USNM); Hagensborg, 12.vii.1992, A. Borkent (CNC); Hope, 15 mi E, 12.vii.1973, H.J. Teskey (CNC); Lk. Errock, nr Deroche, 2.vi.1953, W.R.M. Mason (CNC); Lund, 7 km SE, 16.viii.1988, A. Borkent (CNC); Mission City, 5–22.vi., 2.vii.1953, W.R.M. Mason (CNC); Mt. Allard, 23 mi N Terrace, 11.viii.1960, CHM (CNC); Mt. Thornhill, nr Terrace, 30.vii., 8.viii.1960, BH, CHM (CNC); Prince Rupert, 18.vii.1960, W.R. Richards (CNC); Queen Charlotte Is., Moresby Is., Sand spit, 0–50 m, vi.1978, N.L.H. Krauss (USNM); Queen Charlotte Is., Graham Is., Rennell Sound, 16.vii.1988, S.A. Marshall (CNC); Kelkirk Mtns, Downie Ck, 14.viii.1905, J.Ch. Bradley (CUIC); Terrace, 17–18.vii., 2–11.viii.1960, W.R. Richards (CNC); Terrace, airport area, 3–4.viii.1960, BH, CHM (CNC); Terrace, 32 mi E, 11.vi., 5,13. vii.1960, J.G. Chillcott, BH (CNC); Terrace, 35 mi W, Exchamsiks R, 9.vii.1960, J.G. Chillcott (CNC); Vancouver Is., Courtney, 0–50 m, 1.vii.1978, N.L.H. Krauss (USNM); Vancouver Is., Deep Bay, 16.vi.1955, R. Coyles (CNC); Vancouver, Pt. Grey, 8.viii.1972, 10.vii.1988, J.R. Vockeroth (CNC); New Westminster, 8.viii.1917 (USNM). USA. Alaska: Cold Bay, 163°W, tundra, 26.vii., 13–18.viii.1952, W.R. Mason (CNC); Hyder, 5.viii.1996, PHA (USNM); Popof Is., 8,10. vii.1899, Harriman Expedition ’99, T. Kincaid (USNM); Valdez, 3 mi W, 24.viii.1948, R.I. Sailer (USNM); Valdez Glacier Cpgd, 2.viii.1978, PHA (USNM). California: Arcata, 8.vii.1954, M.T. James (CUIC); Humboldt Co., Mad R. Beach, 14.viii.1948, W.W. Wirth (USNM); Marin Co., Inverness, 4.viii.1968, D.D. Munroe (CNC); Mendocino Co., Mendocino, 9.viii.1963, PHA (USNM); San Francisco City, Lk. Merced, 30.vii.1966, 11.vii.1967, PHA (USNM). Oregon: Boyer, 26.v.1935 (AMNH); Curry Co., Cape Blanco, 29.vi.1972, G. Steyskal (USNM); Lane Co., Siuslaw NF, 3 mi S Yachats, Gwynn Ck trail & Rock Ck, 15.vii.1989, B.J. Sinclair (CNC); Marsh Field, vi.1927, J.M. Aldrich (USNM); Mt. Hood, Hood Rapids, 29.vii.1921, ALM (USNM); Mt. Hood, Nooksack R, 11.viii.1925, ALM (USNM); Smith R., 8.vii.1930, J.M. Aldrich (USNM). Washington: Ana Cortes, 21.vii.1960, F.C. Harmston (USNM); Brinnon, Forest Res., 27.vii.1917, ALM (USNM); Burton, 19.viii.1910 (USNM); Canyon Ck, 26.vii.1925, ALM (USNM); Everett, Lk. Stephane, 3.viii.1917, ALM (USNM); Ilwaco, vii., 27.viii.1917, 12, 28.vii.1925, ALM (CUIC, USNM), 18, 29.vi., 7.vii.1918, A. Spuler (WSU); Lilliwaup, 18.viii.1921, ALM (USNM); Lummi Is., 18.vi.1944, R.D. Shenefelt (WSU); Mt. Constitution, 28,31. vii.1909 (USNM); Mt. Rainier, Tahoma Fork, 25.vii.1922, ALM (USNM); Mt. Vernon, 3.vii.1924, ALM (USNM); Nahcotta, 24,30.viii.1954, 8.vii.1955 (WSU); Ocean Pk, 9– 10, 17.viii.1950, 28.vi., 13.vii.1954, 16.vii.1957, M.T. James (WSU); Pacific Co., Ft Canby SP, nr. Ilwaco, 16.vii.1977, W.J. Turner (USNM); Piedmont, Lk. Crescent, 24.vii.1917, ALM (USNM); Pt. Gamble, 16.viii.1910 (USNM); Quilcene, 24.vii.1917, ALM (USNM); Sequin Bay, 3.xi.1934, ALM (USNM); Sultan, 1.viii.1917, ALM (USNM); Tokeland, 18.vii.1917, ALM (USNM); Tulalip, 3.viii.1917, ALM (USNM); Vashon, 18.viii.1910 (USNM). Recognition. This genus and species is readily distinguished from other North American empidoids by its shiny abdomen, bicoloured antenna, truncate cell cua and simple or unbranched R4+5. Description. Male (Fig. 1). Dichoptic, eyes with very short and sparse ommatrichia, lower facets becoming larger; ocellar bristles pale and slender. Antennae inserted in middle of head; scape and pedicel yellow, stylus brown; postpedicel long and tapered, bearing long pubescence; stylus three-articled, basal article small, square-shaped; second article one-third length of postpedicel; apical article (segment 10) peg-like and longer than basal article. Gena very narrow, not divided. Proboscis pale, yellowish, length approximately subequal to height of head; labrum long and stout, with 5 apparent apical epipharyngeal blades; labium long; labellum not held in horizontal position, bearing 9–10 pseudotracheae; lacinia free, equal in length to palpus; hypopharynx long, slender, equal in length to labrum. Palpus long and pointed, half-length of proboscis, bearing pale setae. Prosternum fused to proepisternum. Pleura light brown, paler on precoxal bridge, with sparse pruinescence; scutum dark brown, mostly covered by pruinescence except outside of dc row at mid-length; postpronotal lobe pale. All thoracic setae pale; acrostichals uniserial, extending to prescutellar depression; approximately 10 dc; only setulae on postpronotal lobe; 1 short presut spal; 2 npl, lower slender and short; 2 short psut spal; 1 pal; 4 sctl. Laterotergite bare; antepronotum with several pale setulae. Wing (length 3.9–4.2 mm) clear with microtrichia; stigma faint, elongate; single short basal costal seta. Costa circumambient; R4+5 simple; Sc evanescent; cell dm produced apically; cell cua (= anal cell) truncate; CuP+CuA (= A1+CuA2) faint, long nearly reaching wing margin. Calypters with fringe of pale setae. Haltere very pale. Legs, including coxae, yellow, apical two tarsomeres dark. Empodium bristleform; pulvilli pad-like. Fore femur with long, white pile beneath; mid femur with posteroventral row of long setae. Fore tibia with anterior apical comb; hind tibia with posterior apical comb. Fifth tarsomere lacking dorsoapical extension. Abdomen dark brown, shiny. T8 well developed, narrowed mid-dorsally. Terminalia (Fig. 2): epandrium enclosing and fused to hypandrium ventrally. Hypandrium reduced, narrow, with pointed apex; bearing pair of phallic guides, extending half-length of abdomen. Phallus filamentous, extended length of abdomen, emerging at apex of hypandrium; base of phallus with double articulated ejaculatory apodeme, moved by set of stout adductor muscles; phallus supported by long forked phallic guide. Cercus not subdivided, held erect. Surstylus large, ear-like, positioned at posterodorsal margin of epandrium. Female. Similar to male except as follows: all femora with long, white pile beneath; fore and mid tibiae with stout dark erect setae beneath. Segment 10 and cerci retracted within T8 (Fig. 3). Spermatheca very elongate, lightly sclerotized tube, longer than abdomen; surface covered by erect pubescence. Genital fork strongly sclerotized, U-shaped and darkly pigmented. Distribution. Boreodromia bicolor was originally described from Sitka, Alaska, from material collected by Sahlberg (Loew 1863). This species is rather localized and occurs along the Pacific coast of North America (Fig. 8), from Alaska to California (Melander 1928), including the Queen Charlotte Islands (or Haida Gwaii). This type of distribution is known as a Pacific coastal-centred element (see Kavanaugh 1988). Bionomics. Boreodromia bicolor has been collected along streams and riparian regions, coastal rainforests and tundra (some Alaskan records). The immature stages of this genus are unknown. Remarks. Boreodromia is a monotypic genus that has been very difficult to place into the existing major lineages of the Empidoidea. Until the revision by Sinclair (1995), this genus had been assigned to the Clinocerinae, presumably due to the narrow wings and truncate or slightly rounded anal cell. Sinclair (1995) transferred Boreodromia to the Trichopezinae, now assigned to the family Brachystomatidae (Sinclair & Cumming 2006). There are striking similarities between the male terminalia of Boreodromia and the Nearctic species of Apalocnemis Philippi described by Melander (1946). Both taxa share the following apomorphies: hypandrium and epandrium fused; elongate, thread-like phallus; erect, unmodified male cerci; ear-like surstyli; and elongate, tube-shaped spermatheca (a narrow tubular spermatheca, lacking terminal sclerotized receptacle, is partially visible in available specimens of Nearctic Apalocnemis species; however, verification in additional specimens is required). The male terminalia of these taxa are also similar to two undescribed species collected during the winter months in California. The latter two species are similar to the genus Gloma Meigen on the basis of their similarly modified postpedicel. The male and female terminalia of B. bicolor are here described and illustrated for the first time. A coloured habitus drawing of this species is found in Melander (1928, fig. 20). This genus can be identified using the key to genera of North American Empididae by Steyskal & Knutson (1981).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,151 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorTravaux en français237 207