MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931352074 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6121973

Paranura reducta Smolis & Deharveng, 2015, sp. nov.

2015· article· en· W6931352074 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChaetaChaetotaxyThorax (insect anatomy)AbdomenMaxillaApex (geometry)Nose

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paranura reducta sp. nov. Figs 28–37, Tables 5–6 Etymology. The name of the species refers to the strong reduction of its labral chaetotaxy. Diagnosis. Body white. 3+3 eyes on head. Tubercles and reticulations not developed. Head with chaetae O, A and E. Head with three ocular chaetae. Thorax I with 2 chaetae De. Thorax II–III with 3 chaetae Di. Thorax II–III with 3 and 4 ordinary chaetae De respectively. Abdomen V with 2+2 chaetae Di. Abdomen V slightly longer than VI. Abdomen without clavate chaetae. Furca rudimentary with microchaetae. Male ventral organ present. Tibiotarsi with chaetae M. Description. Habitus typical for Paranura Axelson, 1902 genus. Buccal cone slightly elongated. Body length (without antennae) 0.8–1.7 mm (holotype: 1.05 mm). Colour of body when alive and in alcohol white. Tubercles not detected. Ordinary dorsal chaetae (Figs 28, 37) differentiated into short, thin, acuminate microchaetae, medium size, smooth, acuminate mesochaetae and long, nearly smooth (with denticles visible under large magnification, Fig. 37), relatively thick, acuminate macrochaetae Ml and Mc. No plurichaetosis on body. Head. Antennae distinctly shorter than head (Fig. 28). S-chaetae of ant. IV relatively short and thick, S1 and S2 slightly thinner and smaller than others (Fig. 28). Apical bulb distinct and trilobed (Fig. 30). Chaetotaxy of antennae as in Fig. 31 and Tab. 5. Buccal cone relatively long and rounded at apex (Figs 29, 33). Maxilla needlelike, mandible tridentate. Chaetotaxy of labium as in Fig. 32, labial papillae x absent. Labrum chaetotaxy 0/2,2 (Fig. 29). Group Vi with 6+6 chaetae (Fig. 32). Groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 3–4, 4 and 4 chaetae respectively. Dorsal chaetotaxy of head as in Tab. 5. and Fig. 28. Dorsal chaetotaxy of central area on head complete, with 3 chaetae Oc and chaetae A, B, C, D, E, F, G, O. Line of chaetae Di2–De2 crosses line Di1–De1 on head (cross-type, Deharveng 1983). 3+3 relatively large eyes, their diameter about three times as large as the diameter of chaeta Ocm socket (Fig. 28), pigmented in black. Thorax, abdomen, legs. Dorsal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 28 and in Tab. 6. Ventral chaetotaxy as in Tab. 6 and Figs 34, 35. S-chaetae long, nearly equal to nearby macrochaetae (Figs 28, 36). S-chaetae formula of body: 022/11111, s-microchaeta on Dl of th. II present. Furcal remnant with 4–6 mesochaetae and 6 minute microchaetae (without chaetopores and visible only under magnification 1000x, Fig. 34). Male with thick and forked chaetae in groups Ag (abd. V) and Ve (abd. VI) (“ventral male organ”). Claw without internal tooth. Chaeta M present on tibiotarsus, chaetae B4 and B5 short. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Tab. 6. Types. Holotype: male on slide, United States of America: Oregon, Blue River Ranger District of Willamette National Forest, neighborhood of H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, 7 km North–East of Blue River town, c. 500–650 m above sea level, “Mona Creek” site, valley of Mona Creek, coniferous forest of Tsuga heterophylla Zone, ex decayed log, 26.IX.2006, leg. A. Smolis. Holotype deposited in DIBEC. Paratypes: 5 females, 2 males and juvenile on slides, same data as holotype. Three paratypes (2 females and male) are housed in MNHN, the others in DIBEC. Other material. Female on slide (DIBEC), USA: Oregon, Blue River Ranger District of Willamette National Forest, neighborhood of H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, 6.5 km East of Blue River town, c. 520–550 m above sea level, “Cougar 1” site, old-growth forest of Tsuga heterophylla Zone, ex decayed log, 27.IX.2006, leg. A. Smolis; numerous specimens on slides and in alcohol, 18 km North of McKenzie Bridge town, c. 1450 m above sea level, “Wild cat” site, old-growth forest of Abies amabilis Zone, ex decayed logs, 4.X.2006, 9.VI. 2009, leg. A. Smolis. Remarks. The new species is most similar to Paranura mjohjangensis Deharveng & Weiner, 1984 (from North Korea) and P. oregonensis sp. nov., resembling them in having the complete chaetotaxy of central area of head and the same number of eyes, ocular chaetae and chaetae Di on abdomen V. Among these species, Paranura reducta sp. nov. is most diagnostically recognized by labral chaetotaxy, with only 4 chaetae (0/2,2; in mjohjangensis, 4/5,4; in P. oregonensis sp. nov. 4/2, 4). Other characters, in combination, that allow to distinguish P. re d uc t a sp. nov. from these species are: the number of labial lateral chaetae (in P. reducta sp. nov. and P. oregonensis sp. nov. 3 chaetae, in mjohjangensis 4 Fig. 59), number of ordinary chaetae De on abdomen IV (in P. reducta sp. nov. and mjohjangensis 2 chaetae, in P. oregonensis sp. nov. 1 chaeta), microchaetae on furcal remnant (in P. reducta sp. nov. and P. oregonensis sp. nov. present, in mjohjangensis absent). Considering the last character should be mentioned that microchaetae in P. reduct a sp. nov. are very minute and can be overlooked (Figs 34, 35). a) Cephalic chaetotaxy––dorsal side. b) Chaetotaxy of antennae. Terga Legs Di De Dl L Scx2 Cx Tr Fe TT th. I 1 2 1 – 0 3 6 13 19 th. II 3 3+s 3+s+ms 3 2 7 6 12 19 th. III 3 4+s 3+ s 3 2 8 6 11 18 Sterna abd. I 2 3+ s 2 3 VT: 4 abd. II 2 3+ s 2 3 Ve: 5; Vel present abd. III 2 3+ s 2 4 Ve: 4–5; Fu: 4–6 me, 6 mi abd. IV 2 2+ s 3 7 –10 Vel: 4; Vec: 2; Vei: 2; Vl: 4 abd. V 2 5–6+s Ag: 3; chaetae L‘ and Vl present abd. VI 7 Ve: 12–14; An: 2 mi Several characters: the presence of 3+3 eyes, the complete chaetotaxy of central head area, labral chaetotaxy 0/ 2,2, tubercle De of th. III with 5 chaetae and tubercle Di of abdomen with 2+2 chaetae, and rather unusual habitat of the new species (dead coniferous logs) are suggestive of close relationships with P. sitchensis Fjellberg, 1985 (described from Alaska and known also from Vancouver Island, Fjellberg 1985). However, both species are readily distinguished by the following features: the clavate chaetae on two last abdominal segments (absent in P. re du c t a sp. nov., present in sitchensis), colour of the body (white in P. reducta sp. nov., bluish-gray in sitchensis), the length of tibiotarsal chaetae B4 and B5 (short in P. reducta sp. nov., long in sitchensis) and number of lateral labial chaetae (three in P. reducta sp. nov., four in sitchensis). Considering the differences between both species it should be mentioned that there are only two described species of Paranura with clavate chaetae on abdominal segments V and VI, the mentioned P. sitchensis and P. clavisetis (Axelson, 1902) described from Finland (Europe) and later considered by different authors as a junior synonym of P. sexpunctata. Biology. The species is resident in lower and upper montane (from 500 to 1400 m) conifer forests of both Tsuga heterophylla (Fig. 38) and Abies amabilis Zones (Franklin & Dyreness, 1988). It can be treated as a truly saproxylic species (according to Speight’s definition, Speight 1989) as it was found only in coarse woody debris of coniferous tree species: Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziessi, western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla and noble fir Abies amabilis. Despite intensive field investigations it was not collected from dead wood of deciduous trees and litter/soil samples.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,107
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,121 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→Travaux en français237 207→