MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931425120 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6095931

Boreantrops pollex Kits & Marshall, 2015, sp. nov.

2015· article· en· W6931425120 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTibiaClawBrachycephalyHindlimbTarsus (eyelids)Occiput

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Boreantrops pollex sp. nov. (Figs. 89, 90, 91, 126) Diagnosis. Separable from other members of the emarginatus group by the following characters: Occiput black, prementum yellow. Anterior margin of anepisternum shiny below spiracle. Mid tibia without row of anterodorsal bristles. Hind tibia with one ventroapical bristle. Wing with white spot on vein R4+5 basal to r-m crossvein and at vein tips. Male postgonite without a projection on posterior margin. Description. Occiput black, frontal triangle and orbital plates reddish brown to dark brown, interfrontal plates orange to reddish brown, face, gena, and antenna orange. Maxillary palp and prementum yellow. Occiput and gena covered with microtomentum, frons mostly shiny with microtomentum on orbital plate in a line medial to inner vertical and around bases of orbital bristles, face with microtomentum below lunule and in dense crescent below antenna. Ocellar bristles just anterior to median ocellus. Subvibrissal and anterior genal bristle about 0.5X length of vibrissa. Thorax black, mostly covered with microtomentum. Proepisternum shiny, anepisternum mostly shiny with microtomentum covering dorsal quarter and posterior third, katepisternum with a shiny spot behind fore coxa, meron and metapleuron shiny with band of microtomentum between posterior spiracle and hind coxa. Halter white, brownish below knob. Legs black, trochanters and joints dark reddish brown, fore tarsus brown, mid and hind tarsi with 2 basal tarsomeres yellow, 3 distal tarsomeres brown. Mid tibia with 1 anteroventral, 6 subapical bristles. Hind tibia with 1 long thin anteroventral, 1 ventroapical bristle. Wing brown, veins dark brown. White spots on crossvein r-m, bm-cu, and dm-cu, veins R2+3 and M with spots at apex, vein R4+5 with 1 spot basal to crossvein r-m, 2 distal to crossvein r-m, and 1 at apex. Vein R2+3 slightly recurved (as in Fig. 20). Abdomen with tergites and sternites weakly sclerotized. Syntergite 1+2 with posterolateral corners and a thin band between them strongly sclerotized, tergites 3–4 with a thin posterior band moderately sclerotized. Male postabdomen: Sternite 5 with lateral margins strongly rounded, posterior margin broadly but shallowly notched, anterior apodeme slightly longer than external portion, without keel (Fig. 90). Epandrium extending medially above cerci but not fused in middle, anal opening keyhole shaped. Surstylus with anterior thumb-like projection, ventral portion narrow, posterior margin with peg-like setae ventrally (Fig. 91). Pregonite not fused with postgonite, fairly large. Postgonite very narrow, posterior margin straight, lobes not separated, posterior lobe longer. Basiphallus narrow, with long epiphallus, preepiphallus broad, triangular. Distiphallus with a long dorsal tube with spines near base, flanked by two spike-like sclerites, distal sclerite projecting dorsally (Fig. 89). Female postabdomen: Tergites 6–7 and sternites 6–7 much wider than long, tergite 6 with thin, irregular sclerotization along margins, tergite 7 sclerotized along anterior and lateral margins only, sternite 6 with some irregular sclerotization along anterior margin, sternite 7 sclerotized around margins, medial unsclerotized patch round. Tergite 8 broad, heavily sclerotized, lateral margins rounded, anterior margin with a narrow notch, shallowly emarginated posteriorly, posterior two-thirds covered with microtomentum. Epiproct with fairly long anterior arms, 1 pair of setae, microtomentum medially. Cerci long, narrow. Sclerites of sternite 8 with anterior half shiny and sculptured, posterior half slightly wider, covered with microtomentum. Hypoproct rounded, moderately sclerotized except small, central weakly sclerotized spot. Spermathecae sausage-shaped, about 5X longer than wide, with shallow apical invagination, sclerotized duct about two-thirds as long as bulb. Type material. Holotype ♂: ECUADOR: Napo: Baeza, 5 Mar 1979, S.A. Marshall, debu01039421 (QCAZ). Paratypes: same data as holotype (11 ♀, DEBU, QCAZ); Baeza, 7 km S, 2000 m, dung trap, 22 Feb 1979, H. & A. Howden (1 ♂, 3 ♀, USNM); as above but 23 Feb 1979 (4 ♀, USNM); as above but 25 Feb 1979 (12 ♂, 3 ♀, USNM); Cosanga, 3.5 km S, trail above pipeline, 2250 m, sweeping, 6 Nov 1999, S.A. Marshall (1 ♀, DEBU); Cosanga, 4.2 km S, pipeline trail, 2200 m, 7 Nov 1999, S.A. Marshall (1 ♂, 1 ♀, DEBU); El Chaco, 2000 m, Malaise trap, 15–23 Feb 1983, Masner & Sharkey (1 ♂, DEBU); SierrAzul Lodge, 14 km W Cosanga, 2200 m, forest, sweeping, 5 Nov 1999, S.A. Marshall (1 ♀, DEBU); SierrAzul Res., 14 km W Cosanga, 2200 m, 10 May 2002, S.A. Marshall (1 ♀, DEBU); as above but dung baits, 8–11 May 2002, M. Buck (1 ♂, 4 ♀, DEBU, QCAZ); as above but on dung, 9–10 May 2002 (1 ♀, DEBU); Zamora-Chinchipe: San Francisco, Reserva Biológica San Francisco, Atajo trail, 2000 m, yellow pans, 14–18 Feb 2009, M. Pollet & A. De Braekeleer (1 ♂, UTPL); as above but 18–25 Feb 2009 (2 ♂, DEBU, UTPL); San Francisco, Reserva Biológica San Francisco, Canal trail, 2000 m, blue pans, 18–25 Feb 2009, M. Pollet & A. De Braekeleer (1 ♀, UTPL); as above but yellow pans, 17–25 Feb 2009 (1 ♀, UTPL); as above but 25 Feb–3 Mar 2009 (5 ♂, 5 ♀, DEBU, UTPL); San Francisco, Reserva Biológica San Francisco, Río San Francisco trail, 2000 m, yellow pans, 18–25 Feb 2009, M. Pollet & A. De Braekeleer (1 ♀, UTPL); as above but 25 Feb–3 Mar 2009 (3 ♀, DEBU, UTPL). Distribution. Ecuador, on the eastern slope of the Andes (Fig. 126). Elevations from 2000–2250 m. Etymology. The species name refers to the thumb-like projection on the surstylus (Latin pollex, thumb). It is a noun in apposition. Comments. This species is very similar to B. punctipennis but is separable based on the male genitalia. The known ranges of the two species are widely separated, although most of Peru is poorly collected and they may approach more closely than is currently known. We obtained partial COI sequences from two specimens of each species (sequenced at the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario). The sequences of B. pollex (Genbank accession numbers JX 260384 and JX 260385, both from SierrAzul Lodge) differed by 0.16%, while those of B. punctipennis (Genbank accession numbers JX 260382 and JX 260383, from Apa Apa Reserve and 10 km NW Caranavi) differed by 0%. The minimum distance between the species was 2.46% (all distances based on Kimura 2-parameter measure).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSalivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsTravaux en français237 207