Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lasionycta leucocycla species-group The L. leucocycla species-group is comprised of 33 species in North America. Males are defined by a cylindrical to slightly laterally compressed uncus tapered to a hook-like apex. Th ose of other species-groups are dorsoventrally flattened and laterally expanded with blunt tips. Females have ovipositor lobes covered by short peg-like cornuti whereas those of other species-groups are covered with hairs. Th e genitalia of most species are closely similar and are of limited use for identification of individual species. They are described in the following paragraphs, with significant features of each species subgroup and species noted subsequently as appropriate. Males have a simple strap-like valve. Th e costal lobes are variable, small to moderately large. The cucullus is weak to moderate size (0.7–1.4× valve width) separated by a nearly absent to mildly constricted neck. Th e corona of 15–40 curved setae is arranged in a single row, a single row with irregular apical double row, a complete double row, or as an irregular patch up to 4 rows wide. Th e triangular or finger-like digitus is oriented 30–45° ventrad to the valve. The aedeagus is tubular without projections. The vesica is 1.5–2.0× as long as the aedeagus, the basal portion is coiled 360° (dorsad, then anterior, ventrad, and rightward) and its distal portion is gently twisted 180° to project rightward and/or ventrad. Th e 0–6 subbasal cornuti are located on the basal coil and are elongate, comprised of a central spike arising from a smooth cone-shaped base. In the female, the ductus bursae is cylindrical, slightly expanded anteriorly. The corpus bursae is 1.1–1.6 x as long as the corpus bursae. The corpus bursae is ovoid and focally constricted distal to the appendix origin, about 50 % in most species, but weakly in the L. staudingeri and L. impingens sub-groups. The appendix bursae arises from the dorsal posterior margin of the corpus bursae and extends dorsad and posterior. Its base is slightly expanded and the distal third tapers bluntly following a 90° posterior and slight leftward bend. Th e bursa appears unisaccate in the sub-groups with weak constrictions. The male antennae are variable in width, ranging from weakly biserrate to broadly bipectinate (1.4–5.4× as wide as the shaft). The L. leucocycla species-group contains the majority of species in the genus and is significantly larger than the “ L. leucocycla complex” of Lafontaine et al. (1986). They restricted the complex to L. leucocycla and present members of the L. staudingeri subgroup based on ellipsoid eyes and pale hindwings, both characters are likely adaptations to diurnal flight. We divide the species-group into seven sub-groups of similar-appearing species to aid identification, recognizing that this arrangement might not be entirely phylogenetically accurate. In fact, CO1 distance analysis divides the species-group into four major divisions – L. subfuscula (Grote), L. caesia sp. n. from the L. phoca sub-group, and two larger assemblages (Fig. 248). One of the large DNA groups contains the L. leucocycla and L. perplexa sub-groups plus L. staudingeri and L. subfumosa from the L. staudingeri sub-group. Th e other large assemblage contains the other L. staudingeri sub-group species (L. lagganata (Barnes & Benjamin), L. quadrilunata (Grote), L. dolosa (Barnes & Benjamin)), the L. promulsa and L. impingens sub-groups, and the remaining members of the L. phoca sub-group. DNA sequences are not available for several species (see Fig. 248).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».