MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931461656 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4672749

Okanopteryx Archibald & Cannings & Erickson & Bybee & Mathewes 2021, new genus

2021· article· en· W6931461656 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueOptimization and Search Problems
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenusQuadrangleSensuType species

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Okanopteryx Archibald & Cannings, new genus Figs. 44–60. Diagnosis. Wings separated from other genera of Dysagrioninae by a combination of pterostigma 2.5 times longer than wide [separated from Okanagrion: 3–3.5, rarely 4 times; Stenodiafanus: almost 4; Phenacolestes: 4.5–5; Furagrion: 3; Primorilestes: 3.5; Dysagrion: 3–7.5; Dysagrionites species: unknown]; with oblique brace vein [separated from Okanagrion, Phenacolestes, Primorilestes; not separated from Dysagrion, Furagrion, Stenodiafanus: present; unknown in Electrophenacolestes, Dysagrionites as wing region not preserved]; costal space 2 cells wide distal to pterostigma [distinct from Dysagrion, Furagrion, Phenacolestes: all 1; Okanagrion: 3–5; shared by Primorilestes, Stenodiafanus: both 2; Electrophenacolestes, Dysagrionites species: not known by preservation]; subnodus with normal obliquity [separated from Dysagrion: reversed obliquity; all others: normal obliquity, slight to notable]; no accessory antenodal crossveins [distinct from Phenacolestes, Electrophenacolestes, some Dysagrion species: with; not separated from others: also without]; IR2 origin rather evenly between RP1-2, RP3-4, connected to RP1- 2, RP3-4 at similar level [Dysagrion: between RP1-2, RP3-4, closer to RP3-4, connected with RP1-2 distinctly more distally than to RP3-4; other genera as in Okanopteryx, except some Okanagrion species: IR2 origin close to or on RP1-2]; MA linear to mid-wing, somewhat to strongly zigzagged to margin [separated from Okanagrion: MA linear or only slightly zigzagged from quadrangle to margin; Primorilestes: MA not zigzagged; Dysagrion: MA linear from quadrangle to zigzagged roughly mid-wing or further, linear again near, to margin; Furagrion: similar to Dysagrion (but deeply curved distally); Phenacolestes: very slightly zigzagged or not in mid-portion; not separated from Stenodiafanus, Dysagrionites species (known portions, none known to margin): also linear to midwing, somewhat to strongly zigzagged to margin]; MA, MP close at margin (difficult to be sure of exact identity of MA near margin by strong zigzag) [distinct from Okanagrion, Furagrion, Primorilestes, Electrophenacolestes: MA, MP widely separated; not distinct from Dysagrion: 1–2 cells apart at margin; not distinct from Stenodiafanus: also identity of MA near margin unsure by strong zigzag, but close, probably separated by two cells; Dysagrionites species: also difficult, perhaps one cell]; CuA increasingly zigzagged from to about mid-wing to strongly near margin [distinct from Electrophenacolestes, Primorilestes, Okanagrion: linear or very slightly zigzagged; Furagrion: slightly zigzagged distal to level of origin of RP2; Phenacolestes: slightly zigzagged in parts; not distinct from Stenodiafanus: zigzagged to various degrees distal to about mid-wing; from Dysagrion: increasingly zigzagged distal to level of nodus; or from Dysagrionites species as known, but distal portions not preserved]; further from Okanagrion by wing apical region with less dense crossvenation; distinct from all other Dysagrionidae genera except Okanopteryx by RA, RP1, IR1, RP2 distinctly converge, almost meeting at apex; postnodal, postsubnodal crossveins mostly aligned at least in proximal half [distinct from Phenacolestes, Primorilestes madseni, Dysagrion: all not; not separated from Stenodiafanus, Primorilestes violetae, Electrophenacolestes, Furagrion]; further from Primorilestes by no intercalary vein in CuA–A space. Separated from Valerea (tentative Dysagrioninae) by no linear supplementary sector between RP1, IR1 [Valerea: with such sector]; costal space 2 cells wide distal to pterostigma [Valerea: maximum 5]; origins of IR1, RP2 further from nodus; origin of IR2 between RP1-2, RP3-4 [IR2 origin not preserved, only preserved to level of nodus, where it is closer to RP3-4]. Most easily separated from fossil genera regarded here as possible Dysagrionidae as follows: from Thanetophilosina by no linear sectors between RP1, IR1, between IR1, RP2 [Thanetophilosina: with], by pterostigma 2.5 times longer than wide [about 6]; from Chickaloon specimen (Garrouste & Nel 2019) by CuA becoming zigzagged mid-wing to margin [linear in all preserved portion to near margin]; from NHMUK I.9866/I.9718 by origin of RP3-4 [distinctly closer to subnodus: subnodus to anterio-distal corner of quadrangle about 4.5 times distance to origin of RP3-4]; from cf. Dysagrionidae genus A, species A (“ Megapodagrionidae ” genus A, species A of Petrulevičius et al. 2008) by colouration [preserved portion infuscate except apex distal to pterostigma], MA, CuA zigzagged in distal portion to margin [linear]. Okanopteryx males also separated from those of other Dysagrioninae genera by colouration, mostly hyaline with broad, dark fascia across mid-wing from level of nodus to just apical to mid-distance between nodus, pterostigma (see discussion, below). Type and included species. Type species: Okanopteryx macabeensis; other included species: Okanopteryx jeppesenorum, and Okanopteryx fraseri. Description. Wing. RA terminates on margin at or posterior to apex. MP, RP3-4, IR2 rather straight (at most very gently curved in part except at very base); IR1 almost straight, slightly zigzagged to origin; pterostigma stout for Dysagrionidae (length 2.5 times width), subtending 2.5 cells (but pterostigma not known in O. fraseri). Etymology. The genus name is a toponym formed from Okan- from “Okanagan Highlands” and the Greek πτέρυξ, pteryx, meaning wing. Gender feminine. Range and age. Okanagan Highlands localities of McAbee, BC, Canada and the Klondike Mountain Formation, at Republic, Washington, USA; second half of the Ypresian. Discussion. We describe 22 specimens of three species of Okanopteryx: six of O. jeppesenorum, five of O. fraseri, four of O. macabeensis, and seven unassigned to species. Colouration is consistent throughout all 22 specimens (in a few poorly preserved). We know that paratype 1 of O. macabeensis is a male. As in O. hobani, although we expect that the chances that there are only males in this collection seem small, this could be true. We, therefore, conservatively treat this wing patterning as male, with female colouration unknown.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,610
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetOptimization and Search ProblemsTravaux en français237 207