Walkability for Women and the 15- minute City Framework: The STEP UP Project
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Advanced urban and transport planning activities are shifting towards sustainable urban mobility solutions and walkability (Buhrmann, Wefering and Rupprecht, 2019), namely referring to how friendly the urban environment is for walking in terms of proximity service availability (i.e., <em>15-min city</em>), street connectivity, comfort of public spaces, and road safety. Although traditional approaches tend to focus on the spatial dimension, individual characteristics of city users are found to have a significant impact on the perceived level of walkability. In particular, the measures currently in place do not sufficiently consider population groups in vulnerable situations (i.e., <em>SDG 11.2-Sustainable Transport for All</em>) (United Nations, 2016), including women. The research project ‘STEP UP - Walkability for Women in Milan' (awarded by Fondazione Cariplo under the call “INEQUALITIES RESEARCH” - Grant No. 2022-1643, focuses on the needs and expectations of women while walking. As highlighted by Golan et al. (2019), women experience the city differently than men, in part because they are more concerned with security issues related to aggression and harassment. These constraints take the form of precautionary or avoidance behaviors due to fear of violence, perception of risk, and sense of vulnerability, as a major inhibitor of mobility for women in public spaces especially at nighttime. STEP UP aims to assess the level of walkability for women focusing on the case study of Milan, Italy. First, a thematic literature review will be conducted on the most relevant scientific contributions and policy guidelines about this topic. The results of the literature review will be exploited to select a series of relevant geolocated datasets, which will be retrieved, sorted, and filtered from open data repositories and geoportals. Data regarding the perceived level of safety of women while walking will be collected through ‘Wher' - a route planner application operated by Walk21 Foundation. All these gender-disaggregated data sets will be analyzed through GIS-Geographic Information Systems to design a multi-layer map of Milan focused on several walkability criteria, which will be then validated through survey questionnaires and focus groups. The results of the project will help to identify challenging areas or neighborhoods in the city of Milan, which can serve as samples of analysis to develop a set of policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the level of walkability for women in cities. <strong>References</strong> Buhrmann, S., Wefering, F., Rupprecht, S. (2019). Guidelines for Developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan – 2nd edition. Rupprecht Consult-Forschung und Beratung GmbH. Available at: https://www.eltis.org/mobility-plans/sump-guidelines Golan, Y., Wilkinson, N., Henderson, J.M., and Weverka, A. (2019). Gendered walkability: Building a daytime walkability index for women. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1472 United Nations (2016). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Secretariat. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».