MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931511746 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4618286

Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi Soyka 1946

2021· article· en· W6931511746 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueComics and Graphic Narratives
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeType localityTaxonomy (biology)Type (biology)Nomenclature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi Soyka, 1946 (Figs 1–13) Anagrus armatus var. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276. Type locality: Corvallis, Benton County, Oregon, USA. Lectotype female [USNM], designated by Chiappini et al. (1996: 578), on slide; examined (Chiappini et al. 1996: 578). Anagrus bakkendorfi Soyka 1946: 40. Type locality: Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands. Oldest available replacement name for A. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 (A. armatus var. nigriceps) nec A. nigriceps (Smits van Burgst 1914: 125–127) (Litus nigriceps). Holotype female [NHMW] on W. Soyka’s slide #340; examined (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Anagrus latipennis Soyka 1956: 24. Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 417 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 107 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Jettchenshof [as “Jettchens Hof”; a farm adjacent to the woods, ca. 1 km E of Pisede, ca. 53°46’N 12°46’E, 12 m, formerly in Landkreis Demmin], Malchin, Mecklenburgische Seenplatte, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany; examined (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. bakkendorfi by Chiappini 1989: 106–107. Anagrus avalae Soyka 1956: 24. Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 338 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 108 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Mt. Avala, Belgrade, Serbia; Chiappini & Triapitsyn, 1999: 120–124 (then oldest available replacement name for A. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 (A. armatus var. nigriceps) nec Anagrus nigriceps (Smits van Burgst 1914: 125–127) (Litus nigriceps); examined (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120). Syn. n. Anagrus arcuatus Soyka 1956: 24. Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 335 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 108 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Europe (possibly an unspecified locality in Burgenland, Austria because of an abbreviation “Bgld.” on the original label); examined (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124. Syn. n. Anagrus valkenburgensis Soyka 1956: 24. Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 494 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 107 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands; examined (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124. Syn. n. Anagrus diversicornis Soyka 1956: 24. Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 362 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 108 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands; examined (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. avalae by Chiappini 1989: 108. Syn. n. Anagrus incarnatus ssp. fuscus Boţoc 1963: 99, figs 5a–5d. Type locality (of the lost type (s), not specified): Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania; not examined. Synonymy with A. bakkendorfi by Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004: 29. Anagrus nigriceps: Burks 1979: 1023 (catalog). Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi: Chiappini 1989:106–107 (synonymy,redescription, type information); Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004: 29–30 (synonymy, distribution, comments); Triapitsyn 2015: 12 (key), 27 (coded redescription, distribution, hosts), 42 (checklist, synonyms); Triapitsyn et al. 2020b: 568 (distribution). Anagrus (Anagrus) avalae: Chiappini 1989: 108 (synonymy, redescription, type information); Triapitsyn 2001: 282–284 (taxonomic history, identification, distribution and hosts in Australia and New Zealand); Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004: 24–25 (distribution, host associations); Triapitsyn 2015: 12 (key), 27 (coded redescription, distribution, hosts), 41 (checklist, synonyms); Triapitsyn et al. 2019: 89 (molecular voucher), 94, 96 (genetic analysis); Triapitsyn et al. 2020a: 141 (host in Japan); Triapitsyn et al. 2020b: 568 (distribution). Anagrus oregonensis Triapitsyn in Chiappini et al. 1996: 578–579, then replacement name for A. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 (A. armatus var. nigriceps) nec Anagrus nigriceps (Smits van Burgst 1914: 125–127) (Litus nigriceps); synonymy with A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124. Syn. n. Anagrus avalae: Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124 (taxonomic history, synonymy, type information, distribution, redescription of both sexes, illustrations, diagnosis, host associations). Anagrus bakkendorfi: Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121 (type information including for A. latipennis), 124 (diagnosis, comments). Material examined. NEARCTIC. CANADA. BRITISH COLUMBIA: Oliver, Eggert vineyard (Fairview Cellars winery), collected 5.ii.1999, emerged in Summerland 1.iii.1999, T. Lowery, K. Todd, from leafhopper eggs on wild rose [1 ♀ (Fig. 3), 1 ³ (Fig. 4), UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 1999). Summerland, PARC Entomological Orchard, collected 1.vii.1999, emerged in 28.vii.1999, T. Lowery, K. Todd, from leafhopper eggs on dogwood [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 1999). USA. CALIFORNIA: Alameda County, Albany, Gill Tract, 37°53’09’’N 122°17’58’’W, 10 m, S.H. Wilson, collected 28.viii.2013, emerged 30.viii.2013 from unknown host eggs on an unknown tree [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2014). Mendocino County, Fetzer, 13244 Old River Road, 38°59’22’’N 123°06’15’’W, 153 m, S.H. Wilson, collected 30.viii.2013, emerged 8.ix.2013 from unknown host eggs on alder, Alnus sp. [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2014). Sonoma County, Simi Chalk Hill, 38°38’05’’N 122°45’51’’W, 55 m, S.H. Wilson, from unknown host eggs on alder: collected 7.v.2012, emerged 8.v.2012 [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2013); collected 3.xi.2013, emerged 9.xi.2013 [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2015). PALAEARCTIC. RUSSIA. MOSKOVSKAYA OBLAST’, Pushkinskiy rayon, Pushkino, Mamontovka, E.Ya. Shuvakhina, Malaise trap in garden: 10–20.vii.2000 [1 ♀, UCRC (Fig. 5)]; 20–31.vii.2000 [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2000 and 2002, respectively). PRIMORSKIY KRAY, Ussuriyskiy rayon, Gornotayozhnoye, 43.66°N 132.25°E, 200 m, 21–31.vii.2000, M. V. Michailovskaya, Malaise trap [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2002). SPAIN. NAVARRA, Irati Forest, Iratibizkar, E. Baquero: 1120 m (Malaise trap in Fagus sylvatica forest): 26.vii.2000 [1 ♀, MZNA], 10.viii.2000 [1 ♀, MZNA], 23.viii.2000 [11 ♀, MZNA; 5 ♀, UCRC (Fig. 1)], 7.ix.2000 [1 ³, UCRC (Fig. 2)] (identified as A. bakkendorfi by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2004 except for 6 females in MZNA, collected 23.viii.2000, identified by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2004 as A. avalae); 42.970669°N 1.114398°W, 1154 m, 4.ix.2020, E. Baquero, yellow pan traps [3 ♀, MZNA (2, including molecular voucher PR20-511, UCRC _ ENT 00541253), UCRC (1, molecular voucher PR20-512, UCRC _ ENT 00541252)] (identified as A. bakkendorfi by E. Baquero and S. V. Triapitsyn in 2020). UNITED KINGDOM. ENGLAND: Kent County, Sevenoaks, viii.2014, A. Polaszek, yellow pan traps in garden [1 ♀, UCRC, molecular voucher PR15-026, UCRC ENT 311795] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2015). Surrey County, Woking, 25.vi.1885, F. Enock [1 ♀, MMUE] (on F. Enock’s slide #1332, labeled with his manuscript name “ Anagrus molsoni ”) (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2014). Updated diagnosis. FEMALE. Body color variable, from yellow or light brown except a darker anterior part of mesoscutum, to brown or dark brown except for pale frenum (Figs 1, 3, 5). Antennal funicle with multiporous plate sensilla on F3 (0 or 1) (absent from examined specimens with longer ovipositors that key to A. bakkendorfi in Triapitsyn 2015, Figs 7, 8), F4 (1), F5 (0 (Fig. 8) or 1 (Fig. 7)), F6 (1 or 2). Fore wing (Fig. 9) with 2 rows of setae behind and just beyond apex of venation. Ovipositor (Figs 6, 10–13) of variable length and extent of projection beyond gastral apex, 1.9–3.3× as long as protibia. Otherwise as redescribed by Chiappini & Triapitsyn (1999) for A. avalae and by Triapitsyn (2015) for both A. avalae and A. bakkendorfi. MALE. As described and illustrated for A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn (1999). Body often notably darker (Figs 2, 4) than for some lighter colored females (Figs 1, 3). Distribution. PALAEARCTIC (? Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iran, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom), AUSTRALASIAN (Australia, New Zealand), NEARCTIC (Canada, USA) (Triapitsyn 2015; Triapitsyn et al. 2020b [also as A. avalae]), and possibly NEOTROPICAL (Chile), according to an unconfirmed record of Anagrus armatus nigriceps Girault by Guilleminot & Apablaza (1986), although this record far more likely results from a misidentification. Almost certainly unintentionally introduced from Europe to Australia and New Zealand (Triapitsyn 2001 [as A. avalae]). It is unclear if its occurrence in the Nearctic region is due to its apparent natural Holarctic distribution or an accidental introduction from Europe; we would guess the latter scenario is more likely because in western North America this species is almost exclusively collected in agricultural and garden environments, which have not been well sampled in the eastern Nearctic region. Hosts. Various Cicadellidae (Hemiptera) listed for A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn (1999), Triapitsyn (2001), Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy (2004), and Triapitsyn et al. (2020a). Remarks. As expected, based on the morphological predictive assessment (Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999; Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004), specimens PR20-511 and PR20-512 identified as A. bakkendorfi, in which the ovipositor is 3.0× and 3.3× the length of the protibia, respectively, were found to be genetically very similar to the specimen PR15-026 identified as A. avalae, in which the ovipositor is 2.1× the length of the protibia. Sequences of the nuclear ribosomal ITS2 gene from sp

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,939
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0780,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetComics and Graphic NarrativesTravaux en français237 207