MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931555151 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6134180

Dirrhagofarsus ernae Otto, Muona

2014· article· en· W6931555151 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDorsumApex (geometry)RidgeScutellumHolotypeTapering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dirrhagofarsus ernae Otto, Muona, and McClarin, new species (Figures 1–5) Diagnosis. Within North American Dirhagini, characterized by lateral carinae on frons combined with simple elytral apex. Description. Adult. Holotype male. Length 5 mm; greatest width 1.5 mm. Color black with anterior pronotal margin red-brown. Form subcylindrical, moderately elongate and tapering towards apex (Fig. 1), dorsum clothed with vestiture of short, yellow decumbent hairs. Head subspherical with convex, smooth, shiny and punctate frons. Lateral frontal keels sharp, short, slightly bent and covered with micro-combs, giving a silvery appearance. Vertex with undulating, complete belt of micro-combs. Mandibles stout, bidentate and densely punctate. Antennae redbrown, evenly colored and longer than half the length of the body. Antennomere 3 about 1.4 times as long as 4, antennomeres 4–10 subtriangular and elongated. Antennomere 11 at least 2 ½ times longer than wide. Pronotum slightly transverse and subquadrangular. Anterior portion of pronotum slightly convex. Surface shiny, with moderately dense punctures; small and slightly spaced, sides parallel. Disc of pronotum with a slight depression on both sides. Anterior lateral pronotal carinae reach about ¼ the length of pronotum, while the posterior lateral pronotal carinae (Fig. 2) reach more than ¾ the length of pronotum. Notosternal antennal grooves shiny and smooth. Inner ridge of antennal grooves obliterated on apical half. Scutellum densely punctate, subtriangular and narrowly rounded at end. Elytra have strongly punctate striae and interspaces. Punctures are partly confused, especially basally. Interspaces are convex at the humeral region and largely flat elsewhere on elytra. Legs redbrown in color. Tibiae rounded in cross section. Lateral surfaces of meso- and meta-tibae with single spines. Claws simple. Tarsomere 4 excavate emarginate. Tarsomeres 1 to 3 simple, protarsomere 1 without sex-comb. Tarsomere 1 as long as the preceding four combined in meso- and meta-tarsi. Metatarsomere 2 twice as long as third and as long as fifth. Aedeagus similar to that of D. attenuatus (see Burakowski 1991), but secondary lateral lobes shorter, lateral lobes apically sharper and median lobe slightly shorter (Fig. 4). Aedeagus also similar to that of D. modestus (Fig. 5), but secondary lateral lobes reach nearly the apex of the aedeagus in D. modestus and the apical part of the organ is proportionately smaller and wider, the basal part elongated and narrow. The flagellum in D. ernae is slender and with small hooks evenly distributed towards the apex, whereas in D. modestus it is medially wide and the hooks are more numerous and absent from the apical region. We have examined 68 adult paratypes. Nine larvae and three pupae were also studied. Females are on average slightly larger than males. Their antennae are stouter, not quite reaching half the length of the body, antennomere 11 being about two times longer than wide (Fig. 3). The pronotum is mostly densely punctate to rugose, slightly dullish. The posterior lateral pronotal carina is shorter than in the males, reaching about 2/3 the length of the pronotum. The anterior lateral carina is slightly more acutely angled in the females than in the males. This pronotal dimorphism seems to be true for D. modestus and D. attenuatus as well. The length and height of median carina near the posterior end of the pronotum is variable, many specimens exhibiting a small, shallow to nearly indistinct median carina. Color intensity along the anterior margin of pronotum is slightly variable, but only a few males show a uniform black pronotum, typical of D. modestus. Holotype: Ohio, Hamilton Co., male, “OH: Hamilton Co., Cincinnati, Mount Airy Forest, May 17, 1998, Eric Eaton coll”. Paratypes: Alabama, Dale Co.: 1 example, “Ala. Dale Co., Ft. Rucker Mil. Res., sugar bait, 1–7 May 1999, R. Turnbow”; 1 example, “Ala. Dale Co., Ft. Rucker Mil. Res., 5–12 may 2009, R. Turnbow, manuka oil baited Lindgren funnel trap”. Missouri, DeKalb Co.: 1 example, “MO: DeKalb Co., 13.4 mi. Cameron, 25 May 2007, R. Turnbow”; Stone Co.: 1 example, “MO: Stone Co., Ashe Juniper Natural Area, 4.0 mi. N Hwy 86 on JJ, T22N R22W sec. 20, T.C. MacRae, 00-90b: emerged. 16–23.v.2001, ex. 1–3" diameter dead branch Acer saccharum L., coll. 17.ix.2000 ”. New Hampshire, Hillsborough Co.: 26 examples (14 adults, 9 larvae and 3 pupae), “NH: Hillsborough Co., Nashua, 10 Jan, 2007, Jim McClarin, Reared from larvae in white rotten aspen”. Ohio, Hamilton Co.: 6 examples, “OH: Hamilton Co., Cincinnati, Mount Airy Forest, May 17, 1998, Eric Eaton Coll.”; 1 example, “OH: Hamilton Co., Cincinnati, Price Hill, June 24, 1998, Eric Eaton coll.”; Preble Co.: 2 examples, “OH: Preble Co., Camden, 6 June 2001, M. Ulyschen”; Butler Co.: 1 ex., “OH: Butler Co., Oxford, 6 July 2001, M. Ulyschen”. Pennsylvania, Westmoreland Co.: 2 examples, “ USA, PA, Westmoreland Co., 10 KM S. Ligonier, Powdermill Nat. Res., 29 VI 1996; dead trees and fungus at night; D.A. Pollock”. Virginia, Montgomery Co.: 3 examples, “VA: Montgomery Co., ca 3 km SE Ellett, off Rt. 641, Slaughterpen Hollow, DenCrk, 10 June 2001, J.C. Ludwig UV”; Floyd Co.: 1 example, “VA: Floyd Co., Buffalo Mtn., 3500 feet, 3500–3900', 20 June 2001, S.M. Roble UV”; Bath Co.: 1 example, “VA: Bath Co., Warm Springs Mtn., Jct. Ridgecut Rd & Rd to Trappers Lodge, 14 June 1999, old growth nr. clear cut, J.C. Ludwig UV”; 1 example, “VA: City of Richmond, 9404 Derbyshire Road, Apr–Aug 1995, W.H. Mitchell”. Wisconsin, Dane Co.: 1 example, “NG 14113, United States of America, Wisconsin, Dane County, Madison, Eagle Heights, (300 m), 43º 05' N 89º 26' W, 12.VII.2003, Gompel N. Leg.”; La Crosse Co.: 1 example., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 8, N44º 3.589' W91º 4.430', root sever, Lindgren trap, 29 June 2004, Robert Murphy”; 1 ex., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 3B, N44º 4.082' W91º 4.575', root sever, flight intercept trap, 26 July–9 August 2004, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 8, N44º 3.589' W91º 4.430', root sever, flight intercept trap, 26 July–9 August 2004, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 2, N44º 3.411' W91º 3.430', pkt control, flight intercept trap—inside, 23 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 2 examples., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 1, N44º 3.778' W91º 4.332', pkt control, flight intercept trap—inside, 7 July 2005, Robert Murphy”; 2 examples., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 5, N44º 3.963' W91º 4.521', root sever, flight intercept trap—outside, 7 July 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 2, N44.06296º W91.07220º, pkt control, flight intercept trap—inside, 21 July 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: La Crosse Co., West Salem, Site 5, N44.06605º W91.07220º, root sever, flight intercept trap—outside, 21 July 2005, Robert Murphy”; Milwaukee Co.: 1 example., “NG 14074, United States of America, Wisconsin, Milwaukee County, South Milwaukee, Grant Park, Seven Bridges, 42º 55' N 87º 50' W, Woods, 2.VII.2003, Gompel N. Leg.”; Sauk Co.: 1 example., “WI: Sauk Co., Gatshall property, N43º 4.765' W89º 34.576', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—inside, 16 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Sauk Co., Bakken's Pond, Site 2, N43º 10.830' W90º 9.205', pkt. control, flight intercept trap—out, 16 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; Walworth Co.: 1 example., “WI: Walworth Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 49.551' W88º 36.583', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—inside, 15 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 2 examples., “WI: Walworth Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 49.610' W88º 36.471', root sever, flight intercept trap—outside, 28 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Walworth Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 49.551' W88º 36.583', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—inside, 28 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; Waukesha Co.: 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 51.574' W88º 29.781', pkt control, Lindgren Trap, 9 June 2004, Robert Murphy’; 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 54.616' W88º 27.891', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—inside, 15 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 2 examples., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 54.574' W88º 29.781', pkt control, flight intercept trap—out, 15 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 51.574' W88º 29.781', pkt control, flight intercept trap—inside, 15 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 54.840' W88º 28.088', root sever, flight intercept trap—out, 15 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 49.551' W88º 36.583', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—outside, 28 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 4 examples., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 54.616' W88º 27.891', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—inside, 29 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 54.840' W88º 28.088', root sever, flight intercept trap—inside, 29 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; 1 example., “WI: Waukesha Co., Kettle Moraine St. Forest, N42º 54.840' W88º 28.088', root sever, flight intercept trap—outside, 29 June 2005, Robert Murphy”; Waupaca Co.: 1 example., “WI: Waupaca Co., J. Baker property, Site 3, N44º 18.805' W89º 6.238', asystematic control, flight intercept trap—inside, 22 June 2005, Robert Murphy”. The holotype male and one female paratype are deposited at the US National Museum in Washington DC. Further paratypes are deposited in the American Museum of Natural History, the UW Entomology Museum (UW- Madison), the Insect Research Collection (South Dakota State University), the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, the Royal Ontario Museum in Quebec, the Finnish Museum of Natural History, Bohart Museum of Entomology (UC-Davis), Florida Stat

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,055

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEvolution and Paleontology StudiesTravaux en français237 207