Cremnops vulgaris Cresson
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cremnops vulgaris (Cresson) [Plate 28, Figs A–I] Agathis vulgaris Cresson, 1865. Female. Agathis media Cresson, 1865. Male. Agathis exoratus Cresson, 1872. Female. Diagnosis. This species is easily distinguished by the acute projection off the anterior portion of the scape, narrow hind femur, and large number of hind tibial spines (12–25). Description. Holotype: female. Body length 8 mm (7–9 mm). Head (Figs C & F). Thirty-six (33–37) flagellomeres. Acute dorsoapical projection on scape present. Lateral carina of frons strong, ending immediately anteriad lateral ocellus. Interocellar space not elevated, level with lateral ocelli. Malar space 1.3x (1.3–1.5x) eye height. Apical tooth of mandible extending well past margin of basal lobe, often appearing as one long tooth. Mesosoma (Figs D, E & H). Subpronopes adjacent, separated by a partition wider than the longitudinal length of the dorsomedial portion of pronotum. Median mesonotal lobe depressed medially. Notaulus foveolate. Scutellar sulcus with 6 (1–6) longitudinal carinae. Hind margin of posterolateral scutal flange not prominent; rather: 90° to obtuse (to lobed). Mesoscutellar trough with longitudinal carinae laterally. Metanotal trough with weak longitudinal carinae laterally. Sternaulus with 7 (6–9) pits; about 1/ 2x (1/3–2/ 3x) length of mesopleuron. Discrimen foveolate. Medial propodeal areola with 3 (2–4) transverse carinae. Metapleuron rugose on ventral and posterior margins. Hind leg (Fig. I). Femur length about 3x width. Trochantellar carina absent. Distal tibia covered with 19 (12–23) spines. Claw missing on type specimen, inner tooth of inner and outer claws symmetrical, broad, angled quadrangular-shaped or narrow and angled (to curved), with 4–5 basal pectines. Fore wing (Fig. G). Hyaline with melanic tint (hyaline to dark yellow); veins melanic; stigma melanic. 2nd submarginal cell about as high as wide (2M equal to or slightly longer than 3RSa). Hyaline spot in anterior part of 1st submarginal cell and basal part of 2nd discal cell. Metasoma (Figs A & B). 1st median tergite length about 3x apical width, apical width about 2x basal width. Body Color Orange, except melanic as follows: base of mandibles, labrum, mouthparts, tegula, ventral mesosoma, fore and mid coxae, trochanters, and trochantellus, hind trochanter, trochantellus, parts of femur, tibia and tarsus (to black head and propodeum with melanic color on legs variable). Biology. Host— C. vulgaris has been reared from Loxostege sticticalis (Linnaeus) (Balduf 1962) and L. commixtalis (Walker) (Simmonds 1947). Associated Plants —alpine Astragalus, Astragalus alpines (Faboideae); Augchium pructanii, Echium pininana? Webb & Berth (Boraginaceae); Croton californicus Muell.Arg. (Euphorbiaceae); and alfalfa flowers Medicago sativa L. (Fabaceae) [from label data]. Adults Collected —April to September. Geographic Range —Connecticut west to Washington, Saskatchewan south through Mexico. See map in Appendix II. Comments. Cremnops vulgaris and C. crassifemur are the only two species, worldwide, known to possess an acute projection on the scape. The unusual morphology of this species (e.g. acute scape projection and numerous hind tibial spines) suggests it is sister to C. crassifemur. While analyses of limited COI data for C. crassifemur does not support this sister relationship, these shared character states suggest such a relationship may be the case. In the specimens examined, there was one specimen from the CNC collection that appeared to have some defect in the antennae with only 28 flagellomeres on one side and 21 on the other. Otherwise, all specimens examined fit the species description. Etymology. The word “ vulgaris ” means ordinary or common. While the morphological characteristics of this species clearly are not ordinary, there are many older specimens of this species in the museum collections examined for this revision, indicating that in the past this species was commonly collected. Material examined. HOLOTYPE: female, type no. 1740.1, (ANSP) (H3455 & H8277). Non-Types: 36 (CNC), 91 (ESSIG), 55 (CAS), 11 (FSCA), 64 (MCZ), 6 (NHM), 57 (INHS), 16 (UCDC), 18 (HIC), 46 (UAIC), 8 (CSCA). For holotype and additional images see Appendix VIII.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,053 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».