MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931601587 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5293007

Quedius (Raphirus) liangtangi Tephens 2015, nov.sp.

2015· article· en· W6931601587 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeParatypeDorsumApex (geometry)Head (geology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Quedius (Raphirus) liangtangi nov.sp. (Figs 1-8) T y p e l o c a l i t y. China: Yunnan, Gongshan County, Qiqi, 1900 m. T y p e m a t e r i a l. Holotype () and allotype (): China: " China: Yunnan Prov. Gongshan County Qiqi alt. 1,900 m 2-VII-2010 Liang Tang leg." (SNUC). Paratype (): same data as holotype (ASC). D e s c r i p t i o n. Head piceous-black, becoming narrowly paler anteriorly, pronotum piceous to piceou-black, with all margins, lateral ones more widely, paler, scutellum pale testaceous, elytra pale testaceous, abdomen pale testaceous. Palpi pale testaceous, antennae with first three segments pale testaceous, following segments becoming gradually darker, with outer segments more or less piceous. Head rounded, distinctly wider than long (ratio 1.36), eyes very large and convex, tempora considerably shorter than length of eyes seen from above (ratio 0.20); two additional setiferous punctures between anterior frontal punctures; posterior frontal puncture almost touching posteriomedial margin of eye, one puncture between it and posterior margin of head; temporal puncture almost touching posterior margin of eye; surface of head with quite fine and dense microsculpture of transverse waves. Antenna long, segment 3 longer than segment 2 (ratio 1.22), following segments longer than wide, gradually becoming shorter, last segment shorter than two preceding segments combined. Pronotum wider than long (ratio 1.20), widest at about posterior third, narrowed anteriad, with lateral margins continuously arcuate with broadly rounded base, transversely convex; dorsal rows each with three punctures, sublateral rows each with one puncture close to anterior margin of pronotum; surface of pronotum with extremely fine (markedly finer and denser than that on head) microsculpture of rudimentary transverse waves, waves becoming more regular and more pronounced near posterior margin of pronotum. Scutellum with a few fine punctures, surface with extremely fine microsculpture of rudimentary transverse waves. Elytra relatively short, at suture somewhat shorter (ratio 0.83), at sides as long as pronotum at midline; punctuation coarse and dense, transverse interspaces between punctures distinctly smaller that diameters of punctures, without microsculpture; pubescence pale testaceous. Wings markedly reduced, non-functional. Abdomen with tergite 7 (fifth visible) without whitish apical seam of palisade setae; tergite 2 (in front of first fully visible tergite) impunctate; punctuation of tergites somewhat finer than that on elytra, more or less evenly covering each tergite, in general becoming finer and sparser toward apex of abdomen; surface between puntures with excessively fine microsculpture of rudimentary striae. M a l e. First four segments of front tarsus markedly dilated, subbilobed, each densely covered with tenent setae ventrally; segment 2 markedly wider than apex of tibia (ratio 1.43); segment 4 narrower than preceding two segments. Sternite 7 slightly sinuate medioapically, with three long black setae at each side of sinuation, small narrow area before sinuation impunctate (Fig. 1; sternite 8 with two long black setae on each side, apical margin with rather wide and deep, obtusely triangular medioapical emargination, large triangular area before emargination flattened and smooth (Fig. 2). Genital segment with tergite 10 triangular, markedly narrowed toward arcuate apex, setose as in Fig. 3; sternite 9 with short and wide, rounded basal portion, apical portion with arcuate apex, with differentiated apical and subapical seta on each side, setose as in Fig. 4. Aedoeagus (Figs 5-7) large, elongate, of characteristic shape, median lobe wide, parallelsided in middle portion, anteriorly suddenly narrowed into differentiated attenuate apical portion, on face adjacent to paramere with characteristic carina (Fig. 6); paramere quite long, shaped as in Figs 5, 7, with narrowly arcuate apex slightly exceeding apex of median lobe; four apical setae at apex of paramere, with medial pair conspicuously stronger and longer than lateral pair; two fine setae at each lateral margin below apex and numerous fine setae on each side around and below end of sensory peg setae; sensory peg setae on underside numerous, situated along each lateral margin of apical portion of paramere (Fig. 7). F e m a l e. First four segments of front tarsus similar to those of male, but considerably less dilated, segment 2 slightly narrower that apex of tibia (ratio 0.83). Tergite 10 of genital segment of characteristic shape, setose as in Fig. 8. Length 12.0- 12.5 mm. E t y m o l o g y. The specific epithet is patronymic, the species has been named for Liang Tang, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, who collected all specimens of the original series and whoes exciting company I enjoyed during his study stay in Ottawa. G e o g r a p h i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n Quedius liangtangi is present known only from the type locality in Gongshan county in northwesternmost Yunnan, west of Salween river. B i o n o m i c s.Nothingisknown about the collecting circumstances of the specimens of the original series. R e c o g n i t i o n a n d c o m m e n t s Quedius liangtangi is a very distinctive species both in external characters (size, coloration, chaetotaxy of the head and pronotum, kind of punctuation of scutellum, elytra and abdomen) as well as in the shape of the aedoeagus and tergite 10 of female genital segment. The assignment of this species to the subgenus Raphirus is tentative, there is a possibility that it actually represents a different genus/subgenus level taxon. All three specimens of the original series are more or less teneral, therefore the coloration of mature specimens would be somewhat darker than as described.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,071
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusTravaux en français237 207