MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931781155 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7415305

Coprinopsis squamulosa K. G. G. Ganga, Manim. & K. P. D. Latha. 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6931781155 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPileusBasidiosporeStipe (mycology)BasidiocarpBasidium

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Coprinopsis squamulosa K. G. G. Ganga, Manim. & K. P. D. Latha., sp. nov. Fig 2. A–M MycoBank MB 845756 Etymology:—The specific epithet refers to the squamulose pileus surface of this species. Diagnosis:—Floccose pileus with dark brown squamules at center, ovoid to ovo-ellipsoid basidiospores with a wide and central germ-pore, 4–5 pseudoparaphyses surrounding each basidium, and finely encrusted pleurocystidia. Differs from closely related species, C. kubickae in having larger basidiocarps, paraboloid to cylindrical pileus with recurved and scattered squamules on and around center, smaller basidiospores, and distinctive nrITS and nrLSU sequences. Holotype:— INDIA. Kerala State: Kozhikode District, Calicut University Botanical Garden, 11°08’02.0” N 75°53’29.0” E, 12 June 2019, K. G. Greeshma Ganga G297 (CALI). GenBank accessions: OP549278 (nrITS), OP549708 (nrLSU). Description:— Basidiocarps small, fragile. Pileus 7–15 × 4–12 mm when young, finally 10–24 mm diam., initially paraboloid to cylindrical, expanding to plano-convex with age; surface with brown (6E6/OAC701) velar squamules all over when young, at maturity the squamules becoming dark brown (6F6/OAC698) at the center and whitish elsewhere, initially completely covered with appressed-squamules, at maturity with recurved squamules scattered on and around the center and floccose elsewhere, strongly deliquescent; margin initially straight, becoming upturned with age. Lamellae not observed due to deliquescence, initially white, becoming black at maturity. Stipe 20–55 × 2–3 mm, central, tapering towards the apex, hollow; surface white, smooth, slightly fibrillose towards the base; base slightly enlarged, often with a distinct basal disc. Odor and taste not distinctive. Basidiospores (n = 40) (7)8–9 × 5–7 × 5–6 µm, on an average 8.6 × 5.2 × 5.0 µm, Q 1 = 1.1–1.6, Q 1avg = 1.3, Q 2 = 1.3–1.8, Q 2avg = 1.4, lenticular, ovoid to ovo-ellipsoid with a rounded base and somewhat truncate apex in face view, amygdaliform to subamygdaliform in side view, dark brown, thick-walled, with a central germ-pore up to 2.5 µm wide. Basidia 12–25 × 9–10 µm, clavate, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, surrounded by 4–5 pseudoparaphyses, 4-spored; sterigmata up to 5 µm long. Pleurocystidia 78–95 × 20–38 µm, abundant, cylindrical to sublageniform with short finger-like projections at the apex, finely encrusted, hyaline, thick-walled. Lamella-edge heterogeneous. Cheilocystidia 46–65 × 22–27 µm, ellipsoid to cylindrical often with finger-like projections at the apex, hyaline, thinwalled. Pileipellis a cutis composed of elongate, parallelly arranged hyphae with loosely bound, narrow and inflated velar elements; hyphae 3–12 µm wide, hyaline, thick-walled; narrow velar elements 4–14 µm wide, cylindrical to subcylindrical or coralloid, regularly branched, diverticulate, hyaline, thin-walled; inflated velar elements 5–10 µm wide, frequently coralloid, pale brown to brown, thick-walled (up to 3 µm thick). Stipitipellis a cutis finely overlaid with velar elements; hyphae 10–32 µm wide, hyaline, thin-walled; velar elements similar to those on the pileipellis, 2–6 µm wide, hyaline, slightly thick-walled. Clamp connections observed only in velar elements. Habitat:—Scattered or in small groups, on decaying bamboo litter. Geographical distribution range:—Known only from the type locality in Kerala State, India. Comments:—The characters such as smaller basidiocarps, cylindrical to sublageniform pleurocystidia, and a cutis-type pileipellis with coralloid, brown velar elements lead C. sqaumulosa to the section Coprinopsis. Coprinopsis kubickae shows some similarity to C. sqaumulosa in having floccose velar remnants on pileus, a stipe with a white basal disc, and a habitat on decaying monocot plant remnants. However, C. kubickae differs from C. sqaumulosa in having smaller basidiocarps, subglobose to ovoid pileus with flocculose velar remnants, larger basidiospores (7–11.5 × 6–10.5 µm) with a central to eccentric and narrow germ-pore (1.3–1.6 µm), 5–8 pseudoparaphyses surrounding each basidium, a hymenium with larger pleuro- (55–200 × 12–28 µm) and cheilocystidia (35–120 × 11–28 µm), and thinwalled velar elements on the pileipellis. Coprinopsis friesii (Quélet 1872: 129) P. Karst (1881: 27), common in Europe and also reported from Canada, South America, and North Africa (Uljé 2005), resembles C. sqaumulosa in having similar color of basidiocarps, thickwalled and pale yellow velar elements on pileipellis, almost similar-sized basidiospores (6–9.5(11) × 5.5–7(8.5) µm), pleuro- and cheilocystidia with finger-like projections at the apex, and occurrence on decaying monocot plant remnants. However, C. friesii has basidiocarps with a smaller (up to 15 mm), conical pileus, each basidium surrounded by 5–7 pseudoparaphyses, and red brown basidiospores with a narrow (1.5 µm) germ-pore. Coprinopsis pseudofriesii (Pilát & Svrček 1967: 140) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001: 230), widespread in Europe (Uljé 2005) shows close similarity with C. sqaumulosa in having similar size and color of the basidiocarps, basidiospores with a central germpore, and pleuro- and cheilocystidia with finger-like projections. Coprinopsis pseudofriesii, however, is distinguished from C. sqaumulosa in having basidiocarps with a conical pileus, each basidium surrounded by 4–7 pseudoparaphyses, red brown basidiospores with a rounded apex and narrow germ-pore (1.3–1.6 µm), a pileipellis with narrow velar elements, and growth on a different substratum. Comparison of the nrITS and nrLSU sequences generated from C. sqaumulosa with those sequences available in the GenBank database revealed that it has distinct sequences. A BLASTn search with the nrITS (675 bp) sequence of C. sqaumulosa showed an unidentified Coprinopsis species BLBS 104 (MK843958) as the closest hit with 97.35% sequence similarity. Coprinopsis urticicola (HQ847101: 99.12%) was resulted as the closest hit in a BLASTn search with nrLSU sequence (920 bp). Coprinopsis urticicola differs from C. sqaumulosa in having a pileus with woolly-hairy velar scales, subglobose to ellipsoid basidiospores with a narrow (1–1.5 µm) germ-pore, and thin-walled, encrusted velar elements on the pileipellis. The phylogram inferred from the nrITS-based ML analysis (Fig. 3) showed that these two new species, C. minuta and C. squamulosa were nested within a monophyletic group representing the sect. Coprinopsis. Within this clade, three collections of C. urticicola (MH748639, HQ847015, MW915588), one unidentified species, ‘Basidiomycota species PCT.10’ and two collections of C. minuta together formed a distinct group with full (100%) bootstrap support. Inside this group, C. minuta was shown to be a distinct lineage sister to ‘Basidiomycota species PCT.10’ with maximum bootstrap support (100% BS). The other species, C. squamulosa was found clustered with an unnamed species from Brazil, Coprinospis species BLBS104 with strong bootstrap support (96% BS).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFractal and DNA sequence analysisTravaux en français237 207