Pollinating insects of some economically important plants of Kolhapur region, India
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<strong>ABSTRACT</strong> The area of pollinator dependant crops is increasing disproportionately and crop pollinators are under threat of pesticides and other chemicals used in agriculture farming. Therefore, there is need to make the survey of pollinating insects from Kolhapur region of India since this area is agriculturally very sound which contain very rich biodiversity. A total of 30 species of pollinating insect belonging to the five orders <em>viz.</em> Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera have been reported. Maximum pollinating visits have been made by <em>Apis dorsata</em> and least by <em>Chrysotoxum sp. </em>on crop plants in the region. The order of dominant pollinator was Hymenptera> Lepidoptera> Diptera>Coleoptera>Thysanoptera. <strong>Keywords-</strong> Pollinating insects, Economic plants, Kolhapur, India. <strong>REFERENCES</strong> Aizen, M. A. and L. D. Harder. 2009. The global stock of domesticated honey bee is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. <em>Current Biol</em>.; 19(11), 915-918. Allen –Wardell, G.; Bernhardt, P.; Bitner, <em>et al</em>. 1998. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. <em>Conservation Biology</em>; 12 (11), 8-17. Ananthkrishnan, T. N. 1982. Thrips and pollination biology. <em>Current Science</em>; 51(4), 168-172. Ananthkrishnan, T. N. and Gopinathan. 1986. Insect pollinator-plant interactions, In: Dynamics of insect-plant interaction (Ed.) T. N. Ananthakrishnan, ERI, Loyola college, Madras. pp- 85-101. Annand, P. N. 1926. Thysanoptera and the Pollination of Flowers. <em>The American Naturalist;</em> 60(667), 177-182 Antram, C. B. 2002. Butterflies of India. A mittal publication New Delhi. Armstrong, J. A. 1979. Biotic pollination mechanism in the Australian flora-A review. <em>N. Z. J. Bot.</em>, 17, 467-508. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. <em>Bot. Rev</em>.; 60, 81-109. Desai A.S., Khamkar A.G and T.V. Sathe. 2015. Ecology and Ethology of Crane fly Tipula paludosa Meigen (Tipulidae: Diptera) from Kolhapur region, India. Biolife. 3(1):21-25 Duara, P. 2014. Effectiveness and importance of butterflies as pollinator to the flowers of <em>Lxora coccinea</em>. <em>Int. Nat. J. Res. Studies Biosci</em>., 2(11), 71-74. Duara, P. and J. Kalita. 2014. Butterfly as pollinating insects of flowering plants. <em>Global</em> <em>Journal of Science Frontier Reseach:C Biological Science</em>, 4(1), 1-4. Faegri, K. and L. Vander Piji. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon press, Oxford, 3<sup>rd</sup> ed. Gallai, N.; Salles, J. M. and B. E. Vaissiere. 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. <em>Ecological Economics</em>, 68(3), 810-821. Ghosh, A. K. and D. Jana. 2013. Butterfly-philic plants in agro-forestry of West Bengal. <em>Geobios</em>; 40, 220-222. Hogendoorn, K., Cross, C. L. Sedgley, M. and M. A. Keller. 2006. Increased tomato yield through pollination by native Australian <em>Amegilla chlorocynea</em> (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). <em>J. Econ. Ent.</em>; 99(3), 828-833. Jothimani, K.; Ramchandran, V. S. and A. Rajendran. 2014. Role of butterflies as pollinator in Marathamalai Hills of South western Ghats. <em>Academic Journal of Entomology</em>, 7(1), 7-16. Kirk, W. D.J. 1988. Thrips and pollination biology, In: Dynamics of insect plant- interaction (Ed.) T. N. Ananthakrishnan and A. Raman. pp. 129-136. Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B. E., J. H. Cane et al. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. <em>Proc. Royal. Soc</em>. (B), 274(1608), 303-313. Kunte, K. 2000. Butterflies of peninsular India. Universities press (Hydrabad) and Indian Academy of Sciences (Bengaluru). Morse, R. A. and N. W. Calderone. 2000. The value of honey bee as pollinator of US crops in 2000, Report- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Omkar V. Yadav and S. R. Yankanchi. 2014. Preliminary study of herpetofaunal diversity in Radhanagari wildlife sanctuary (WLS), Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India. Biolife. 2(4):1154-1159 Patil, S. R., Patil, S. S., & Sathe, T. V. (2014). Preliminary Analysis of Diversity Status with Reference to Pisces from major wetlands of Aajara tahsil of Kolhapur district, Maharashtra, India. Biolife. <em>3</em>(1),12-15. Pawara R. H, Patel N.G, Pawara J.V, Gavit, P.J and Ishi S.S. 2014. Beetles of Jalgaon district of Maharashtra, India. Biolife. 2(3):970-973 Sathe, T. V. 2001. Agrochemicals and pest management. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, pp. 1-217. Sathe, T. V. 2006. Fundamentals of bee keeping. Daya Publ. House, New Delhi, pp 1-120. Sathe, T. V. and K. P. Shinde. 2006. Diversity of butterflies from Western Ghats (Kolhapur district). <em>J. Nat. Con</em>., 18(1), 181-184. Sathe, T. V., Anna Gophane and Nilam Shendage. 2015. Colour attractivity and occurrence of some cell sap sucking pests on crop plants<em>. Biolife</em>, 3(2), 540-546. Sharmah, D. Amrita, Khound, S. Rahman and P. Rajkumari. 2015. Significance of honey bee as a pollinator in improving horticultural crop productivity in N.E. region of India: A review. <em>Asian Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences</em>, 4(1), 62-67. Slaa, E. J., L. A.S. Chaves, K. S. Malagodi-Braga and F. E. Hofstede. 2006. Stingless bees in applied pollination: practice and perspectives. <em>Apidologie,</em> 37(2), 293-315. Sunita Devi, Rachana Gulati, Kanika Tehri and Asha. 2014. Diversity and abundance of insect pollinators on <em>Allium sepa</em> L. <em>Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies</em>, 2(6), 34-38. Sushil, S. N., Stanley, J., N. K. Hedau and J. C. Bhatt. 2013. Enhancing seed production of trees Brassica vegitables by honey bee pollination in North-Western Himalayas of India. <em>Universal Journal of Agricultural Research</em>, 1(3), 49-53. Thien, L. B. 1980. Pattern of pollination in the primitive angiosperms. <em>Biotropica</em>, 12(1), 1-13. Winston, M. L. and C. D. Scott. 1984. The value of bee pollination to Canadian agriculture. <em>Canadian Beekeeping</em>, 11, 134. Wynter-Blyth, M. A. 1957. Butterflies of Indian region. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».