Additional file 1 of Translational profiling identifies sex-specific metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming of cortical microglia/macrophages in APPPS1-21 mice with an antibiotic-perturbed-microbiome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Additional file 1: SI. Figure 1. Confirmation of APP/PS1 and FLAG-EGFP-Rpl10a transgenes in APPPS1-21-CD11br mice. A. Genomic DNA from APPPS1-21-CD11br mice was used for PCR amplification using primer set specific for APP, PS1 transgenes. APPPS1-21 mice serve as positive control. B. Schematic to show the binding sites of various primer sets to confirm the presence of FLAG-EGFP-Rpl10a transgene and the amplicon sizes. 1% Agarose gel to show the amplified products. SI. Figure 2. Characterization of CD11b+ cells from CD11br TRAP mice. Representative immunofluorescent images showing co-staining of CD11b with GFP and Iba I from brain sections of WT-CD11br and APPPS1-21-CD11br transgenic mice (A), microglia specific P2ry12 (magenta) and Tmem119 (red) markers colocalized with CD11b+ (green) macrophage/microglia cells from brain sections of 7-wks-old WT-CD11br and APPPS1-21-CD11br male mice (B), microglia specific P2ry12 (red) colocalized with CD11b+ (green) and 3D6 (magenta) stained for amyloid plaques in APPPS1-21-CD11br mice (C). (D) GFP (green) immunostaining colocalized with microglia marker P2ry12 (magenta) in brain sections of WT-CD11br, APPPS1-21-CD11br mice and APPPS1-21 that doesn’t show the expression of GFP was used as a control. The top panel of 2B-D shows low magnification and the selected microglia cells indicated in the box are shown at higher in the bottom panel. SI. Figure 3. Microglia specific transcripts from pull-down of cortical lysates of CD11br mice 7-week mice. Cortical lysates were used for immunoprecipitation of CD11b+ microglia/macrophage ribosomes from WT and APPPS1-21-CD11br male and female mice treated with vehicle or ABX and then for mRNA purification. Primer sets for Tmem119 (A) and P2ry12 (B) were used for RT-PCR analysis to confirm the pull-down of RNA from CD11b+ cells were abundant in microglia. Cortical lysates from APPPS1-21 and non-Tg mice were used as controls to indicate the specificity of pull-down. To account for the pulldown of CD11b expressing macrophages, following the synthesis of cDNA, primers specific for Hexb, a bonafide microglia marker and CD163, a selective marker of perivascular macrophages were used for RT-PCR and the amplicons were resolved on 1% Agarose gel (C, a). The ΔCt (Ct [Gene]-Ct [Gapdh]) values from qPCR analysis using the same primer sets to indicate the pulldown of CD11b+ cells were enriched for microglia (C, b). SI. Figure 4. A. Number of protein quantifications for each group comparison identified by LFQ. B. Venn diagram representing the number of proteins found in all replicates of each group of male mice (RM, TMV, TMA) and female mice (RF, TFV, TFA). SI. Figure 5. Gene Ontology and functional enrichment analysis of DEPs in vehicle-treated male AD (APPPS1-21-CD11br) mice using ClueGo and CluePedia plugins of Cytoscape. GO Terms (Biological Process, Cellular component, Molecular function, Immune pathway) associated with the identified proteins. The most significant parent or child term per functional group (kappa score ≥ 0.4) is shown in the functional grouped network as a group title (a). Peptides associated with the same term are represented by a node. Node color represents the class that they belong. Mixed coloring means that the specific node belongs to multiple classes. Upregulated proteins are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. Edges show the association of the peptide with the terms. The thickness of the edge reflects the association significance. (b) Pie chart to indicate specific GO terms (% terms per group). SI. Figure 6. Gene Ontology and functional enrichment analysis of DEPs in ABX-treated male AD (APPPS1-21-CD11br) mice using ClueGo and CluePedia plugins of Cytoscape. GO Terms (Biological Process, Cellular component, Molecular function, Immune pathway) associated with the identified proteins. The most significant parent or child term per functional group (kappa score ≥ 0.4) is shown in the functional grouped network as a group title (a). Peptides associated with the same term are represented by a node. Node color represents the class that they belong. Mixed coloring means that the specific node belongs to multiple classes. Upregulated proteins are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. Edges show the association of the peptide with the terms. The thickness of the edge reflects the association significance. (b) Pie chart to indicate specific GO terms (% terms per group). SI. Figure 7. Gene Ontology and Functional enrichment analysis of DEPs in vehicle-treated female AD (APPPS1-21-CD11br) mice using ClueGo and CluePedia plugins of Cytoscape. GO Terms (Biological Process, Cellular component, Molecular function, Immune pathway) associated with the identified proteins. The most significant parent or child term per functional group (kappa score ≥ 0.4) is shown in the functional grouped network as a group title (a). Peptides associated with the same term are represented by a node. Node color represents the class that they belong. Mixed coloring means that the specific node belongs to multiple classes. Upregulated proteins are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. Edges show the association of the peptide with the terms. The thickness of the edge reflects the association significance. (b) Pie chart to indicate specific GO terms (% terms per group). SI. Figure 8. Gene Ontology and Functional enrichment analysis of DEPs in ABX-treated female AD (APPPS1-21-CD11br) mice using ClueGo and CluePedia plugins of Cytoscape. GO Terms (Biological Process, Cellular component, Molecular function, Immune pathway) associated with the identified proteins. The most significant parent or child term per functional group (kappa score ≥ 0.4) is shown in the functional grouped network as a group title (a). Peptides associated with the same term are represented by a node. Node color represents the class that they belong. Mixed coloring means that the specific node belongs to multiple classes. Upregulated proteins are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. Edges show the association of the peptide with the terms. The thickness of the edge reflects the association significance. (b) Pie chart to indicate specific GO terms (% terms per group). SI. Figure 9. Isolation and purification of microglia cells from 7-week-old WT-CD11br, vehicle or ABX-treated APPPS1-21-CD11br male and female mice (n=3). Following mechanical dissociation of cortical tissue from freshly perfused mouse brains and Percoll density centrifugation, mononuclear cells enriched for CD11b+ microglia were isolated via fluorescent activated cell sorting (a). (b) Representative flow cytometry gating strategy and co-staining of cells with CD11b-Alexa647 and CD45-Alexa488 antibodies for isolation of microglia CD11bhi-CD45lo. SI. Figure 10. Cecal analysis of APPPS1-21-CD11br transgenic mice treated with vehicle or ABX. A. (a) Representative images vehicle-treated male (M) and female (F) (top panel) and ABX-treated male (M) and female (F) (bottom panel). (b). One-way ANOVA analysis, Sidaks multiple comparison (adjusted p-val <0.0001) shows ABX-treatment resulted in significant increase in cecal weight compared to vehicle treated APPPS1-CD11br in both male and females. Heatmap to represent distinct cecal short-chain fatty acids (B), bile-acids (C) and Tryptophan (D) metabolites identified from metabolomic analysis of cecal content collected from WT-CD11br, vehicle or ABX-treated APPPS1-21-CD11br male and female mice. The metabolites with increased levels in ABX-treated mice are shown in bold. Supplemental Table 1. The list of top 10 upregulated and downregulated DEPs between vehicle-treated APPPS1-21-CD11br and WT-CD11br male and female mice. Supplemental Table 2. The list of top 10 upregulated and downregulated DEPs between ABX and vehicle-treated APPPS1-21-CD11br male and female mice. Supplemental Table 3. List of Primers used for RT-PCR and qPCR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,849 | 0,157 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».