MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6940193674 · doi:10.71747/uow-r3gk326m.28613606

Exploring Parent-Child Shared Book Reading in the First Three Years of Life: Characteristics and Language Outcomes

2025· dissertation· en· W6940193674 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Online (University of Wollongong) · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueReading and Literacy Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)VocabularyLiteracyLanguage developmentCognitionCognitive developmentVocabulary developmentEarly childhood

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Shared Book Reading (SBR) is a widely established home literacy activity that benefits young children’s language and cognitive development (Hoyne & Egan, 2019). Much of the research in this area has focused on interactions between children aged over 2 years and their mothers. When younger ages are considered, reading frequency is often the primary measure of early exposure, overlooking nuances of these early interactions. Relatively little is known about fathers’ involvement in early SBR, or SBR practices outside of Western society. This thesis, comprising five studies, explored the frequency, characteristics, and impact of early SBR on young infants’ and toddlers’ language development within and across families of Western and Asian cultural backgrounds.The first three studies explored early SBR practices within a small cohort of Australian parents and infants. In Study 1, mother-infant dyads were observed reading an unfamiliar book in a laboratory when infants were aged 6 months (n = 17), 9 months (n = 14), or 12 months (n = 17). High frequency maternal behaviours observed from videos were the production of attention attracting behaviours, immediate talk, and verbal encouragement to maintain infant book engagement. Infant communication scores were associated with non-immediate talk (e.g., making connections between the book content and the real world) at 6 months, maternal questions at 9 months, and non-book related talk at 12 months.Study 2 examined the long-term impact of these early maternal SBR behaviours on infants’ language and cognitive development at 18 months. Engaging in non-immediate talk significantly predicted infants’ later communication and vocabulary scores. Nurturing/affectionate behaviours, rather than directives and organisational talk during SBR, also positively contributed to infants’ later vocabulary scores. These findings suggest that the complex language and emotionally-supportive environment of early SBR have lasting benefits for infants’ early language development.Study 3 examined maternal frequency reports of father-child SBR within the first year of life on infant language development at 24 months. Frequent exposure to fathers’ SBR during the early years (both measured in the first year and at 24 months) significantly contributed to infants’ vocabulary at 24 months. These preliminary findings suggest that fathers’ engagement in early SBR has a positive long-term impact on infants’ early vocabulary development and requires further investigation.Given that Study 3 examined fathers’ SBR frequency via maternal reports and did not capture the specific characteristics of these interactions, Study 4 utilised an online survey design to directly ask fathers about their early home literacy involvement with young children. Survey respondents were 151 fathers, predominantly residing in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, or United States, with a child aged 1 to 36 months. In these families, 95% of children experienced early SBR with one or more adult readers. Reading had begun in most families (77%) before the child was aged 12 months, with 49% of fathers reading with their young child at least five times a week. Fathers reported utilising all SBR behaviours identified from Study 1 to some extent. Beyond reading the written text, most frequently reported behaviours included pointing, immediate talk, nurturing/affectionate behaviours, and responding contingently to infants’ vocalisations. These insights offer a foundation for continued exploration of the unique contribution of these early paternal SBR behaviours on infants’ language and cognitive development.Lastly, Study 5 employed an online survey design to extend knowledge of early SBR practices to families in an Asian country, Singapore. In a sample of 74 parents (55% Chinese, 23% Indian, 14% Malay) with a child aged 5 to 46 months, SBR was a common practice, beginning in most families (74%) during the first year. Frequent SBR activities were positively linked to children’s vocabulary scores, and children tended to be engaged in SBR with multiple adults at home. Where a grandparent was reported as the primary caregiver (16% of families), the frequency of grandparent-child SBR was also positively related to children’s language abilities. These findings highlight the need to consider the contributions of parental and non-parental carers to SBR and the home literacy environment of young children in Asian families, and the impact this has on early language development.Together, this thesis reports on the early onset and frequent SBR practices within a sample of Western and Asian families, and offers insights into the characteristics of early SBR with young children. It underscores the value and impact of both mothers’ and fathers’ early and frequent SBR practices, along with a variety of interactions around a book that serves to promote language and literacy in the early years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,046

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,111
Tête enseignante GPT0,362
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch Online (University of Wollongong)→Même sujetReading and Literacy Development→Travaux en français237 207→