Magnetotelluric Investigations of the Tintina Fault Zone for Geothermal Exploration at Watson Lake, Yukon
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Geothermal energy is being investigated as a renewable source of electricity and heat production for communities in northern Canada. The successful development of a geothermal energy project requires three key components: (1) there must be a source of sufficient heat at near-surface depths. Typically, geothermal projects require temperatures of at least 150°C for efficient electricity production while lower temperature resources can be directly used for heating, (2) the rock must contain pore fluids that can be used to transport the heat to the surface through pores, fractures, and boreholes, (3) the host rock must have sufficient permeability such that fluids can move easily through the subsurface in pores and fractures. The community of Watson Lake, Yukon may be a potential site for a geothermal energy project. Studies have show that the area surrounding Watson Lake has high values of surface heat flow and temperatures that may exceed 200°C at depths of 6 km below the surface (Majorowicz and Grasby, 2014). The nearby Tintina Fault zone, a dextral strike-slip fault system, may represent a zone of elevated porosity through which pore fluids could flow and allow heat to be extracted for the production of electricity and heat. However, the exact location of the Tintina Fault zone is poorly constrained due to coverage by glacial deposits. Geophysical methods such as the magnetotelluric method must be utilized to better constrain the location of the Tintina Fault and to identify potential geothermal reservoirs within the fault zone. The magnetotelluric (MT) method measures naturally occurring variations of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields. Analysis of the time variations of these fields can be used to determine the subsurface resistivity structure of the Earth. The MT method is able to locate subsurface areas of low electrical resistivity that may be due to trapped pore fluids in the crust and upper mantle. This makes it one of the preferred geophysical methods for geothermal exploration. During July and August of 2021, 36 broadband MT stations were deployed near the community of Watson Lake. These MT stations recorded time series data that produce apparent resistivity, phase, and tipper data in the frequency range of 0.001 – 100 Hz when transformed to the frequency domain. The data were filtered to remove noise from the signals. These data were then utilized in a 3D MT inversion to create a model of the spatial variation of electrical resistivity in three dimensions. This was done using the ModEM algorithm developed by Kelbert et al., (2014), which was run on the Cedar computing cluster provided by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada. The resulting electrical resistivity model displays four key features of interest for geothermal development at Watson Lake. Two conducting bodies were resolved by the inversion, with electrical resistivity values in the ranges of 1 – 10 Ωm and 10 – 30 Ωm respectively. These features were named C1 and C2. Conductor C1 is located between Highway 37 and the Liard River and is approximately 15 km wide. The top of the conductor is situated at 500 m below sea level, and it extends to a depth of 3 km below sea level. Conductor C2 is located North of the Alaska Highway and East of Watson Lake, with a width of 3 km. The top of C2 is situated at 500 m below sea level and it extends to a depth of 10 km below sea level. Two resistive features were resolved with resistivity in the range of 300 – 1000 Ωm and named R1 and R2. It was determined that the low resistivity of C1 and C2 were most likely the result of either saline pore fluids or interconnected graphite films present within the block of rock located within the Tintina Fault zone. Analysis of the phase tensor data indicates that the Tintina Fault has a geologic strike of between N30°W and N45°W and is likely located further west than previously thought (Yukon Geological Survey, 2022). Future studies are necessary to better characterize the geothermal potential of Watson Lake. These should include expanding the grid of MT stations to better constrain the features detected by the MT study and drilling test wells to sample pore fluids as well as measure the thermal gradient of the area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».