Assessing Variabilities of Extreme Precipitation and Snow Depth Using Climate and Stochastic Models
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Floods are natural disasters with a significant impact on regions worldwide. They cause extensive damage to infrastructure, disrupt transportation and communication networks, and lead to the displacement of populations. Moreover, floods have long-term consequences on ecosystems, agriculture, and economies. In recent years, Canada has experienced several devastating flood events, highlighting the nation’s vulnerability to such disasters. Climate change, with its associated extreme weather patterns, has exacerbated the frequency and intensity of these events. Specifically, heavy rainfall and rapid snowmelt have triggered extensive flooding in multiple provinces. As global temperatures rise and weather patterns change, the world must remain vigilant and adapt approaches to address the evolving threat of floods. To address this issue, we present an extensive investigation of climate models’ performance in reproducing annual maxima of daily precipitation (AMP) globally and daily snow depth (SD) in Canadian catchments. We analyze projections for extreme precipitation, emphasizing the importance of adopting non-stationary models. Additionally, we introduce a stochastic model replicating SD time series with the same observed statistical properties to overcome limited observed SD data. These studies employ advanced and novel statistical methods, including bivariate analyses, L-moment metrics, Monte Carlo analysis, and autoregressive models. To accurately assess climate models, we use numerous unique observational datasets, along with the latest generation of climate models, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), to reflect recent advances in climate change impacts. First, the results show that 70% of CMIP6 models exhibit a percentage difference of ±10% in annual maxima mean and variation. However, CMIP6 simulations generally overestimate daily SD by at least 10%, with some regions challenging to simulate due to their complex atmospheric and land interactions, such as the Arctic and tropical regions. Second, extreme precipitation projections indicate that the return period of 100-year historical events will decrease by approximately 50% and 70% in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively. Under the highest emission scenario, the projected 100-year levels are expected to increase by 7.5% to 21% over historical levels. Using stationary models to estimate the 100-year return level for AMP projections with trends leads to an average underestimation of 3.4%. Third, the developed stochastic model can reproduce daily distributions, temporal clustering and correlation, daily probability of zero, and annual seasonal patterns. This model can provide a reliable synthetic time series of SD, minimizing the scarcity of observed data for SD. This thesis provides engineers with essential information about climate change impacts, climate model performance, statistical behaviour of various models, and necessary datasets related to AMP and SD, which contribute to severe floods. Therefore, the findings are essential for hydrological, hydrodynamical, ecological, and water resources applications, helping society adapt to extreme climate conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».