Reporting of suicidal ideation/attempt during adolescence and young adulthood: A data linkage analysis of medical records and self-report questionnaires
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Surveys on adolescent suicidal ideation and attempts predominantly utilize self-report questionnaires (Hallford et al., 2023; Plöderl et al., 2011). Increasingly, these surveys are being complemented with linked medical records (Anderson et al., 2015; Nock et al., 2022; Schriver et al., 2020) of suicidal ideation/attempt. Despite this, concordance and discordance between self-report data and medically obtained information remains largely unexplored, with virtually all studies focusing on the agreement between self-reports, parental reports, and clinician assessments (Jones et al., 2019; Klaus et al., 2009; Lungu et al., 2019; Terrill et al., 2021; Vera-Varela et al., 2022). The notable exception is the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), where Mars et al. (2016) uniquely combined self-reported questionnaires on self-harm with hospital records, encompassing admissions for self-harm, outpatient visits, and emergency visits. This study found that non-completion of the self-harm questionnaire was associated with higher hospital admissions for self-harm. Additionally, it highlighted that around 20% of medically documented self-harm incidents were not reported by participants in their self-assessments. However, this study was limited by its inability to examine individual and familial characteristics associated with discordance between self-report and medical records or to detect differences between questionnaire responders and non-responders, due to low rates of self-harm recorded in medical records. Additionally, the study's generalizability is limited by its reliance on linked hospital self-harm admissions data for only 24% of a subsample who consented to data linkage. This study also only examined self-harm and did not include indices of ideation. Similar to ALSPAC, the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (QLSCD; Orri et al., 2021) a population-based study tracking 2,120 individuals from birth (late 1990s) to adulthood, collected multiple waves of self-reported data on suicidal ideation and attempts. This study was enriched by linking medical records on suicidal ideation and attempts for over 98% of the participants, along with data on key individual and familial characteristics to more accurately identify factors associated with self-reported and medically identified suicidal ideation/attempt. Using data from the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development, which includes self-reported past-year suicidal ideation/attempts at ages 17, 20, and 23, along with corresponding medical records for suicidal ideation/attempts, our objectives are to: 1. Explore concordance and discordance in reporting of suicidal ideation/attempts as identified through self-reports and medical records across ages 17, 20 and 23 years. 2. Examine the association of individual factors (e.g., emotional/behavioral problems) and familial factors (e.g., family functioning) during childhood (6 to 12 years) with reporting concordance and discordance of suicidal ideation/ attempts, as identified through self-reports and medical records.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,033 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle