MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6944783458 · doi:10.22067/econg.2024.87223.1105

Important and influential factors in mineralization and grade changes of Manto-copper deposits with a special look to Nasim, Mes e Sorkh and Zarmehr mines

2024· article· en· W6944783458 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChalcociteMineralization (soil science)MalachiteCopperSedimentary rockMineral resource classificationPolymetallic replacement depositVolcanoBornite

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Manto-type copper mines occur in the Bardaskan-Doruneh copper belt. On the basis of structural sedimentary division of Iran, this belt is located in the northeastern part of the Central Iran. At the southern border of this belt, the Yazd structural block and in the north of it is the Sabzevar subzone. The important regional structures of the region are Doruneh and Taknar faults. The majority of the units in this belt are Tertiary volcanic rocks that is associated with some sedimentary units, also some intrusive units are sometimes visible in the form of dyke and stock structures. The main host-rock of mineralization is conglomerate, which is different in grain size, clasts and cement. The most common sulphide mineral is chalcocite and the most important copper carbonates are malachite and azurite. The intense alteration is not observed in the region, and the chloritic alteration is partial, and the alteration of Fe-Oxide, zeolite, calcite, and silica is just observed locally. Mineral solution is reduced and poor in iron and silica. Introduction Manto type copper deposits in the Bardaskan-Doruneh copper belt, with a length of approximately 60 km in a northeast-southwest direction, host more than ten active copper mines such as Zangalu, Zarmehr, Dahane-Siah, Mehr-Ajin, Mes-e-Sorh, Cheshme Hadi, Nasim, Sepidsarw, Cheshme Marzieh and a number of mineral areas, which according to the characteristics of these types of deposits (location, genetic pattern, geometry, host rock, minerals, etc.) and their similarities with Manto type copper deposits in Chile, Canada and the northern Michigan area, it is called as Manto-copper deposits in Iran. Materials and Methods This research includes two parts of field and laboratory investigations. Field studies were carried out in a region with about 60 km in length. Field operations include surveying and searching the area, sampling and distinguishing rock units and mineralization indicators, as well as important geological features of the area. The number of 20 thin sections for lithological investigations, as well as 20 polished thin sections and 10 blocks of drill cores (examination and study of 20,000 meters of drill core related to Nasim, Zarmehr, Mes-e- Sorkh, Cheshme Hadi and Kimia mines) and surface outcrops for a map of mineralization in the area was prepared and studied. Field surveys were conducted for mineralization controllers and host rock changes in the mining pits of Nasim, Zarmehr, Mes-e-Sorkh and Cheshme Hadi mines. Also, due to the importance of tectonic structures, a structural map of the mines was prepared. Discussion and Results The rock units from old to young include: Basalt, Andesite-Basalt, Andesite, Conglomerate with more volcanic fragments, Limestone, Siltstone, Marl and evaporite sediments including gypsum Marl. The general extension of this lithological sequence is northeast-southwest. Mineralization has occurred within the conglomerate unit. There are different types of conglomerate based on the size of the clasts, the lithology of the clasts, and the cement. The type of conglomerate has a great effect on mineralization and grade changes. Conglomerate is a suitable host for mineralization due to the porosity of the rock. The dip and strike of the ore body follows the dip and strike of the lithological units of the region and the deposit is of the stratibound type. Mineralization zone has a variable thickness between 2 and 6 meters (in some places, the thickness increases due to the action of faults). The dip of the ore body varies in different parts and is between 15 and 80 degrees towards the south and southeast. The mineralization texture is mostly disseminated and veined and is mainly as chalcocite mineral. In some places, due to effect of tectonic forces and the formation of fault structures, the order and sequence of units has been dislocated and messed up. Fault structures: The first group of fault structures with the northeast-east to southwest-west direction are the most important fault structures. These fault structures form the boundary between the Andesite unit and the sedimentary units and in the surface of mineralization outcrop can be seen along its length and it is one of the old structures in the region because it has been cut and dislocated many times by other fault structures. The second group is the north-south oriented structures and caused displacements in the mineralized host unit. This fault system, which itself consists of several parallel fault structures, has caused the creation of secondary spaces and the intensification of mineralization, and as a result, the grade has increased in some parts of the region by joining these parallel faults together and with deepening of the basin the intensity of mineralization has increased. The third group of fault structures with the northwest-southeast direction are right lateral strike-slip and minor left lateral strike-slip faults. These structures are one of the most important fault structures in the region, which displaced the rock units of the region, especially the host of mineralization.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,050

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,106
Tête enseignante GPT0,447
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→Travaux en français237 207→