MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6944898510 · doi:10.22162/2075-7794-2017-30-2-2-13

Topographic Descriptions of the Lower Volga Region as a Milestone in the History of Scientific Studies of the Territory: the 1770s - early 1800s

2018· article· en· W6944898510 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMilestoneVolga regionGovernorWork (physics)DozenQuarter (Canadian coin)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The article studies the history of creation and contents of topographic descriptions of the Lower Volga Region written in the 1770s - early 1800s. Topographic descriptions are a special form of scientific works aiming to comprehensively analyze the geography, natural surroundings, history and economy of a single governorate or province. In the last quarter of the 18th century, several dozen topographic descriptions of various Russian provinces and governorates were written. In the course of our research, four similar works dedicated to the Lower Volga region were discovered, namely: Introduction to Astrakhan Topography by the first correspondent of the Russian Academy of Sciences P. I. Rychkov; Description of Saratov Vicegerency by Saratov Governor I. I. Polivanov; Historical and Topographical Description of Saratov Province written under the editorship of Saratov Governor P. U. Belyakov; and The Economic Description of Astrakhan and Caucasian Governorates by Astrakhan official I. V. Rovinsky. Creation of a topographic description required purposeful large-scale work in terms of empirical data collection. In this connection, P. I. Rychkov failed to complete work on his topographical description and, thus, limited himself to publishing an Introduction to Astrakhan Topography. I. I. Polivanov who worked on the description of Saratov Vicegerency in the early 1780s was probably able to collect more materials but, however, only a short version of his work was published, while other collected materials were not preserved. Saratov Governor P. U. Belyakov and Astrakhan official I. V. Rovinsky were able to complete their works on topographic descriptions. As distinguished from earlier works about the Lower Volga Region, their compositions were largely based on local sources of information - documents, annals, historical legends of local inhabitants. Provincial officials who had to write detailed works devoted to their territories had to use such sources for the first time, since they had limited opportunities to work with scientific literature in Astrakhan and Saratov. The use of a wide range of sources, high level of erudition of the authors allowed them to create unique encyclopedic scientific works depicting the Lower Volga Region. The authors not only collected huge empirical data but offered some original critical interpretation. For the first time ever and on a high professional level, the topographic descriptions analyzed lots of issues related to the history, current state and prospects for the development of the region. Not all topographic descriptions were published. One of the most interesting composition containing topographical and historical descriptions created under the editorship of Saratov Governor P. U. Belyakov was sent to Moscow and St. Petersburg. In Saratov, the manuscript of this work was not preserved and remained unknown to local researchers until the 1920s. In view of the mentioned difficulties, the topographic descriptions had no serious impact on the development of scientific thought in the Lower Volga Region. Unfortunately, the data collected in topographic descriptions, recommendations for the development of the region made by the authors on the basis of their analysis were not applied in practice by the state bodies of the region.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Science ouverte
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,171
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,008
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0060,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,393
Tête enseignante GPT0,535
Écart entre enseignants0,142 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Même sujetRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsTravaux en français237 207