MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6945507114 · doi:10.25549/usctheses-c89-57840

An examination of child protective service involvement among offspring born to young mothers in foster care

2018· dissertation· en· W6945507114 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Southern California Digital Library · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueChild Abuse and Trauma
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFoster careOffspringQuarter (Canadian coin)PopulationFoster parentsSocial workPaternal careYoung adult

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Nationally, the rate of teen births has dropped significantly over the past quarter century and currently stands at a historic low. However, females in foster care, and those who recently exited from care, have increased birth rates during their teen years in comparison to peers. Research in California found that among females in foster care at age 17, 11.4% had given birth at least once before age 18 and 28.1% by age 20. Due to federal laws that have extended foster care services to non-minor dependents, there may be a growing population of pregnant and parenting youth under the supervision of child protective services (CPS) in the years to come. Yet, the number of pregnant and parenting youth in care were not systematically documented by the child protection system nationally prior to 2016 and little is known about the outcomes of the offspring. ? Although interviews with young parents in foster care indicate they are motivated to prevent two-generation CPS involvement for their children, the risk may be increased because of the lack of financial, emotional, social, and parenting support. A study in Illinois found that 39% of offspring born to parents in care were investigated by age 5. This paper is organized as a three-study dissertation focused on young mothers in foster care and the two-generation risk of CPS involvement for their children. ? Study 1: Literature Review (Prepared for the Journal of Child and Adolescent Social Work) All studies related to pregnant and parenting mothers in foster care and their offspring published between 2011 and 2017 were identified by two reviewers using four search methods. Studies were included if findings were published by research entities, government agencies, or in a peer-reviewed journal. These studies provide a strong case for the need for leadership in child welfare to take on sexual and reproductive health interventions. Findings suggest that efforts that successfully delay pregnancies among girls in care would be associated with improved outcomes for both mothers and children. Studies focusing on parents in care detailed the need for comprehensive supportive services for parents that are tailored to address their unique parenting experiences and highlighted the resilience of these parents. Key solutions and next steps were described. ? Study 2: Linked, Administrative Data (Prepared for the Journal of Adolescent Health) Using probabilistically linked birth and CPS records from California, this population-based study examined all mothers who (1) gave birth before age 21 between 2009 and 2012 and (2) were in foster care on or after the estimated date of conception. Using a second data linkage, offspring born to identified mothers were followed for the first 3 years of life to assess CPS involvement. Between 2009 and 2012, 2,067 offspring born to mothers in foster care were identified. The data linkages revealed that 52.6% of all offspring experienced a CPS report by age 3 (n=1,102). Trends over time documented that offspring CPS involvement decreased while the proportion of mothers remaining in care at older ages increased. A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify 3 distinct classes of mother-child dyads named (1) Non-minor mothers with long, stable placements, (2) Minor mothers with short placements, and (3) Mothers with long, unstable placements and mental health conditions. A second LCA included an offspring CPS report by age 3 as a distal outcome to examine the association between class membership and the risk of two-generation involvement. Class 1 was the lowest risk for a CPS report

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0120,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,195
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Southern California Digital Library→Même sujetChild Abuse and Trauma→Travaux en français237 207→