MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6945529480 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25935163

A Tale Of Two Uncles

2024· other· en· W6945529480 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Oxford · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWifeBrotherCrewQueen (butterfly)George (robot)Front (military)StairsWorld War IINavy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I would like to add information about my two uncles who both had very different experiences in the Second World War.Firstly my Uncle John Edward Jenkins who was my Mother's brother and was born on the 26 April 1922.When the war started in 1939 my uncle, who was then 17 had just left school. He immediately enlisted in the RAF, and was subsequently selected to go to Canada to train as a pilot. Many years later my younger niece, Sarah, was doing a project into the WW2 and wrote to John asking about his experiences. The attached letter is his reply in he describes some of what happened to him. He flew Lancasters and was also in the Pathfinder Squadron.In the letter he describes ditching in the North Sea and there is more detail about this in the eulogy which was given at his funeral. I quoteOn one such mission (bombing raid over Germany in Lancaster) his plane was hit, members of his crew suffered injury and his co-pilot died in his arms. He kept his aircraft in the air most of the way home across the North Sea but was finally forced to ditch. He and his survivors lay in their inflatable raft in freezing conditions for 22 hours before being picked up. For this and other exploits John was awarded the DFC.The photo shows John's crew at one time standing in front of 'his' bomber M for Mother. Note the awards that they all held.The photo of John with his wife Vida shows him wearing his medals. John taught in BFES schools for a number of years in both Singapore and Cyprus and I guess the photo was taken at a mess night at one of the stations.My second uncle, Walter Alfred Pearce (Uncle Wally to my sister and me) was born on the 17th February in the East End of London. He was one of the largest family in the East End at that time and was proud of being a true cockney born within the sounds of the Bow Bells. I believe there were 11 or 12 children in the family. He left school and became a compositor. In 1937 he joined The Territorial Army and we have a photo of him at the 131st Infantry Brigade Camp in Falmer in 1937. In 1939 he was a L/Cpl in the Territorials who were ordered to Southampton en route to Le Havre. He was captured when retreating to Dunkirk and eventually found himself in Thon POW camp in Poland. Family history tells that he did escape at one time, was captured and interrogated but we don't know anything about this episode. He and his fellow POWs left the camp with German guards and suffered a dreadful time crossing from Poland into Belgium eventually. A march which took About 4 months. The story he has written down for us is so moving. At one stage they saw Lancasters dropping bombs near Danzig to help the Russian Army. He later found out that one of his brothers was in the bombers. After the war Uncle Wally was interviewed by the Imperial War Museum who recorded his story. It appears from materials he has left behind him that at least two colleagues had approached him for his memories. Among these are a few draft chapters where someone has collected some of his memories of the war. I will add one or two stories from these at the end of this story. Unfortunately we do not know the name of the author. My Uncle Wally and Auntie Dot married after the war. She, too, had had many experiences in the war but my cousin says she talked very little about them. He has managed to find out that she was a gun layer in the ATS and saw service in the South of England and on mainland Europe. At the end of the war she was in Brussels, Cologne and possibly Berlin sorting through captured documents.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of OxfordTravaux en français237 207