International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): A workbook with important classification cases
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
STUDY PURPOSE: The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) provides a widely accepted system for determining level and severity of a human spinal cord injury (SCI). The ISNCSCI is widely used for clinical purposes (communication of level and severity, monitor changes over time, establish rehabilitation goals and therapy programs and to predict neurological recovery on a group level) and in research (characterization, outcome measures as well as inclusion/exclusion criteria and (sub-)grouping criteria). Its successful application demands accuracy in both the examination and classification, of which the latter is the focus of this work. ISNCSCI classification involves precise rules and nuances, and inherent challenges have been described. The heterogeneity of SCI adds further complexity. A comprehensive dataset of representative ISNCSCI cases with annotated classifications is not yet available within the field. Therefore, the purpose of this dataset is to provide such a workbook to illustrate important classification rules, definitions, and nuances for a wide range of spinal cord injuries. DATA COLLECTED: Twenty-six hypothetical ISNCSCI cases were created by the authors to illustrate important classification rules, definitions, and nuances. Each case contains all 134 examined scores (2 body sides times 28 dermatomes light touch scores; 2 times 28 pin prick scores, 2 times 10 myotomes motor scores as well as voluntary anal contraction and deep anal pressure sensation) as well as all 11 classifications components: right and left sensory levels, right and level motor levels, neurological level of injury, completeness, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, right/left sensory zone of partial preservation, right/left motor zone of partial preservation. Each case additionally contains detailed explanations of the process for classifying each variable. The cases are documented and classified according to the eighth edition of the ISNCSCI revised in 2019 (https://doi.org/10.46292/sci2702-1). The cases cover a wide range of topics such as: - New ISNCSCI concepts introduced with the 2019 revision like the -- Non-SCI taxonomy for documentation of non-SCI related conditions superimposed to the SCI that may influence the examination of motor/sensory scores and impact the classification components (e.g., amputations, peripheral nerve lesions, pain, tendon transfers) -- Broadened ZPP applicability not only for sensorimotor complete, but also for a subset of incomplete lesions - Inherent classification challenges -- Motor incompleteness due to sparing of motor function more than three segments below the motor level -- Use of non-key muscle functions in the determination of motor incompleteness -- Motor levels in the high cervical and thoracic regions, where the motor level follows the sensory level -- The correct classification of levels, completeness and zones of partial preservation for ASIA Impairment Scale E classifications DATA USAGE NOTES:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,037 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle