Le Fähnlein: Antiche bandiere di guerra dei cantoni svizzeri
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When we have the chance to see a flag display in Switzerland we can notice side to side modern style flags and flags modelled on other patterns, such as the so called “geflammt” (flaming flags) or in some cases the fähnlein, ancient flags used in war some centuries ago to distinguish the Swiss military contingents. To know why these latter came into use we have to go briefly through the history of the making of the Confederation. Officially the Swiss Confederation was born on the 1st August 1291. This is all of a myth, just rising the signing of a Pact of mutual help among three Cantons (the so-called Originary Ones) to the start point of indipendence. Actually this has been a long and not straight process, and many other Pacts of mutual help were signed since then. The territory of nowadays Switzerland was quite half and half in the lands of the Duchy (later Kingdom) of Burgundy and the Roman Sacred German Empire. The very core of the birth of the Confederation being under the power of the Emperor, we must point out that all the process has gone slowly and by steps. Many episodes of rebellion to the feudal lords, Imperial grants of privileges to towns, respect and disrespect by each Canton of the Pacts signed, wars against common foes fought together, wars between Cantons, new territory acquisitions into the Confederacy or conquests to enlarge the boundaries of some Cantons, are all aspects that occur in the way to the aknowledge of a real indipendence. This came only in 1648 with the Treaty stipulated in the so-called Peace of Westfalen. In all this lapse of time, the Confederates fought frequently to affirm their landlordship. Since early XIV century every Canton sent a contingent under its proper banner, thus creating a colourful but very fierce bunch of men and flags who faced enemies with as many a bunch of colourful flags. To avoid confusion and tactical errors on the field, armies began to feel the need to become more identifiable, thus adopting a specific mark of sign different from other armies; the Habsburgs’ armies wore a red cross, the Burgundians and later the Imperials wore a St.Andrew red cross. For the first time in the battle of Laupen in 1339, it is reported that the contingent sent by Berne (at that time not part of the Confederacy, but only allied to) wore on its clothing two white linen strips sewn to form a cross, just to be recognized as part of the Confederate Army. From that time this sign, that we can call “of membership”, widespread to all the Cantons eventually shifting on their flags, or as we can better say on their colours, not exactly matching all the fähnlein with the corresponding flag. The use of this crosslet and the colours of each Canton were finally stated by the Federal Assembly (Diet) in 1480, officially creating a kind of flag for military use different from that for other purposes. It went out of use in the late ‘500, facing the adoption of a unique distinctive common flag to identify the Confederation. Even if the fähnlein are a whitness of the “birth” of the Swiss cross, they have since long been stored in the closet of the historical souvenirs, from where nowadays they are often pulled out to make their show and embellish a flag display, side by side with modern ones or others in traditional pattern.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,048 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».