In vitro optimization of antioxidants for total parenteral nutrition for newborns
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Newborns with gastrointestinal anomalies or premature birth often require lifesaving nutritional support in the form of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). However, TPN administration is associated with several complications in newborns. Several studies have suggested that it could be due to oxidant generation in the TPN admixture due to various factors, including light exposure. Therefore, these studies aimed to assess the peroxidation of the commercially available TPN for newborns by increasing levels of antioxidants and decreasing levels of prooxidants and optimizing the environmental conditions, leading to the development of a new admixture to be tested in a cell culture model. Standard TPN, similar to that in use in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Janeway Children Hospital, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada (control diet) and the antioxidant-fortified all-in-one (AIO)-TPN (test diet), were prepared immediately before experiments commenced by optimizing each selected antioxidant. Both TPNs were light-exposed (LE) and light-protected (LP) for 24 hours. Standard and optimized AIO-TPN, both LE and LP, were treated to THP-1 human monocytes for further assessment of peroxidation, antioxidant status, and endoplasmic reticular (ER) stress. Peroxide levels in the AIO-TPN were gradually increased with increasing light intensity (at 0 Lux=1.020 (±0.07) vs. at 3000 Lux=1.588 (±0.088) mM H₂O₂ equivalents; p < 0.05). L-ascorbic acid at 60 mg/kg/day (2.27 mM), DL-α-tocopherol acetate at 8.8 mg/kg/day (124.1 μM), selenium at 4 μg/kg/day (0.24 μM), glutathione at 4 mg/kg/day (40 μM), copper at 40 μg/kg/day (4.2 M), and zinc at 300 μg/kg/day (30.6 μM) in TPN significantly decreased peroxide levels (p < 0.05). The peroxide levels of optimized LE AIO-TPN were significantly decreased compared to standard LE AIO-TPN (1.165 (±0.042) vs. 1.439 (±0.074) mM H₂O₂ equivalents, p < 0.05). L-ascorbic acid and DL-α-tocopherol acetate at 20 μM fortified SMOFlipid® treated to the THP-1 cells significantly decreased lipid peroxidation compared to the control (1.16 (±0.04) vs. 1.56 (±0.15) μM thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), respectively; p < 0.001). Optimized AIO-TPN treated THP-1 cells generated less reactive oxygen species (ROS) than standard TPN. TBARS levels in LE-standard AIO-TPN (3.484 (±0.247) μM), for 24 hours treated THP-1 cells were significantly higher than LP 24 hour-AIO-TPN treated cells (1.257 (±0.153) μM); p < 0.05. The optimized LP AIO-TPN for 24 hours treated THP-1 cells had the highest cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) activity (36.97 (±9.63) %), followed by LE-optimized AIO-TPN for 24 hours (33.93 (±9.1) %), whereas the CAA of standard AIO-TPN was 13.37 (±5.069) %; p < 0.05. Though LP-optimized AIO-TPN for 24 hours treated THP-1 cells exhibited a higher ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) activity (49.5 (±7.73) Trolox equivalents (TE) μg/mL), the FRAP activity of LE-optimized AIO-TPN treated cells was low (23.63 (±2.67) TE μg/mL). Even though the oxidized form of glutathione (GSSG) at 40 μM concentrations for TPN decreased the peroxide levels, the reduced form of glutathione (GSH)/GSSG ratio was low, indicating low redox potential in THP-1 cells. ER stress protein, GRP78 expression was high in THP-1 cells treated with LE AIO-TPN compared to LE standard TPN. However, it did not significantly differ. These studies concluded that peroxide levels were significantly increased when TPN was exposed to light. Optimizing TPN using antioxidants demonstrated lowering lipid peroxidation, better antioxidant capacity, and improving ER stress. Overall, these studies give novel insight into a promising strategy to develop a new TPN formula for newborns, particularly preterm babies, to decrease in vitro oxidants and eventually minimize the complications associated with oxidative stress in neonates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».