MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6948628436 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10571326

Microsphecodes peckorum Graham & Packer 2024

2024· article· en· W6948628436 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBotanical Research and Applications
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPedicelHolotypeScutellumScapeParatype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Microsphecodes peckorum Graham & Packer Figs. 2–10, 13, 25, 33–35, 37 & 39 Diagnosis: The combination of mesosoma varied in colour with extensive pale markings but the mesoscutum largely dark brown (Figs. 3–6), clypeus <4X as wide as long (Figs. 2 & 10), mesoscutum entirely lacking microsculpture except across anterior margin (Figs. 5 & 8) and T1 entirely and T2 partly orange brown to entirely yellow brown (Figs. 6 & 9) separates this species from all others except M. kathleenae. The two differ in a range of minor characteristics, but most readily in the relatively smaller ratio of IAD to AOD (Fig. 2 also compare figures 36 and 37) and the degree of setation, which differs most notably on the metasoma (compare figures 39 and 40). Description: Holotype female: Dimensions: Approximate body length 4.44 mm; forewing length 3.76 mm; head broader than long, width 1.34 mm, length 1.18 mm; intertegular distance 0.86 mm. Colouration: Black-brown except as follows: Mandibles yellow, apical 1/3 red-brown; labrum light brown apically; torulus and extreme base of scape yellow; pedicel orange, flagellum brown; pronotal lobe and tegula yellow; scutellum and metanotum orange-yellow; wing veins dark brown; wing membrane translucent. Legs orange-yellow except metacoxa dark brown, and metafemur brown except yellow at base and apex. T1 orange-yellow; T2 disc brown, the rest orange-yellow; T3–T4 brown with irregular apicolateral orange-yellow patch; T1–T4 apical impressed areas translucent yellow-brown; T5 brown, apical impressed area opaque brown; pygidial plate dark red-brown; S1 brown basally, orange-yellow apically, margins dark brown; S2–S4 yellow, apical impressed areas translucent yellow-brown; S5–S6 brown. Pubescence: pale yellowish, relatively sparse fine simple sub-erect to erect except when stated otherwise; hairs of face dense, somewhat plumose, on clypeus mostly longer than on rest of face; sparser and longer on vertexal area than on face, but shorter than longest hairs of clypeus; anterior surface of flagellum hairs dense and short with underlying placodea. Pronotal collar with sparse yellow hair dorsally, lateral surface with short hairs, pronotal lobe hairs plumose; side of mesosoma with dense somewhat plumose short white subappressed hairs with sparse long white hairs intermixed; metatibia hairs simple, longest apicoventrally, shorter than or equal to the apical width of tibia; dorsal surface of metatibia with fine pale bristles bearing few short branches on dorsal side of rachis. T1–T2 glabrous except for scattered hairs especially laterally and basally; T3–T5 hairs denser, of medium length on disc, longer laterally, short and white basally. S1 hairs long, sparse along midline, absent elsewhere; S2–S6 with scattered long hairs, S3–S5 with a transverse row of simple, posteriorly oriented hairs apically. Surface Sculpture: Integument shiny lacking microsculpture unless stated otherwise. Face densely punctate i<0.5d except sparser towards apex of supraclypeal area and towards ocelli mostly i~1d; impunctate around ocelli; vertexal area behind ocelli minutely roughened; genal area punctures small i~1d; hypostomal area very weakly imbricate, obscurely and sparsely punctate. Mesoscutum imbricate along anterior margin between notauli, punctures distinct, irregularly spaced mostly i=0.25–3d around margins, sparser on disc; mesoscutellum disc sparsely punctate, punctures smaller and denser i<d around margins; metanotum punctures obscure, irregularly spaced. Metapostnotum dorsal surface margined by strong carina; areolate, median pair of areolae on either side of a complete median carina take up most of the dorsal surface with smaller elongate areolae laterally. Preepisternum weakly rugose, more distinct anteriorly and below hypoepimeral area; both areas finely punctate i~1d except sparser dorsally on hypoepimeral area; mesepisternum punctures small and somewhat ovoid, i<d; metepisternum with coarse longitudinal striae; areolae on posterior surface of propodeum variable in size, irregular in shape. Tegula impunctate, weakly imbricate anteriorly. T1–T2 punctures very sparse and weak, T3–T5 punctures small, hair-bearing. Sterna weakly imbricate, punctures scattered and mostly hair-bearing. Structure: Mandible shorter than compound eye (0.7: 0.76 mm). Clypeus more than 3.5X broader than long (0.86 mm: 0.24 mm). Supraclypeal area convex, somewhat protuberant in profile. Frontal line carinate from below lower tangent of antennal socket to 1 MOD below median ocellus (MOD = 0.14 mm). Inner margin of compound eye convergent below: UOD:LOD 0.88 mm: 0.82 mm; ASD 0.1 mm, IAD 0.18 mm; supraclypeal area almost as wide as long, width 0.28 mm, length 0.3 mm; IOD:OOD 0.2 mm: 0.3 mm; vertex strongly convex in frontal view, upper tangent of compound eyes 0.5 MOD below lower tangent of median ocellus; genal area narrower than compound eye in profile (0.28 mm: 0.38 mm). F1 and F2 of similar length. Mesoscutum shorter than ITW (0.78 mm: 0.86 mm). Stigma large, 0.66 mm long, 0.24 mm broad, L:W <3:1; marginal cell 1.14 mm long, 0.35mm wide, free portion less than 3X as long as that subtending submarginal cells (0.92 mm: 0.32 mm); 1m-cu meets second submarginal cell slightly beyond middle, stigmal perpendicular just beyond 2r-m; hind wing with five hamuli. Pygidial plate apically rounded, surface concave. Variation: The two known specimens vary in details of colouration as indicated by comparing figures 5 & 6 with 8 & 9. Material Studied. Holotype female: VENEZUELA, Merida, Tabay LaMucuy, 1900 m, 18.VI–2.VIII. 1989, [8.62 -71.057] S.&J. Peck, M[alaise] T[rap] streamside meadow. Paratype female: VENEZUELA, Aragua, Parque Nac [ional]. H[enri]. Pittier, Rancho Grande, env[irons] [10 -67.6], 1100 m, 9.IV.1994, L. Masner, s[creen].s[weep]. Both specimens will be returned to the CNC pending completion of ongoing studies. Etymology: We are happy to name this new species after the collectors of the holotype, well-known Canadian entomologists Stewart Peck and Jarmilla Kukalova-Peck. Comments: This species is known from two localities separated by less than 450km (Fig. 13). The paratype was caught with a sweep net with an additional 1/ 4inch mesh to screen out large pieces of debris (Masner, personal communication).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,556
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0410,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetBotanical Research and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207