Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Eparces quadriceps (Cresson, 1867) Figs 3–5 Ichneumon quadriceps Cresson, 1867: 312. Holotype: ♀ [ANSP]: examined by DDP “[White label] Can. // [White label] quadriceps / ♀ Cres // [Red label] TYPE No. / 1304– ”. Original type series. In the original description, Cresson (1867: 312) mentioned two specimens —a male and a female—from Canada and Connecticut (USA). However, there was no indication of which of the two specimens was collected in either location, nor was one designated as the name-bearing type. Cresson (1916: 51) later compiled the type list of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP) and designated the lectotype as a female from “ Canada. In good condition ”. However, during a visit to the ANSP collection by DDP, the lectotype, which had been labeled and recorded in the literature as a female, was, in fact, a male specimen (Fig. 4). At this stage, it remains unclear whether Cresson misgendered one of the two specimens or if there was mismanagement during the segregation of the types. This issue has been extensively discussed by Dal Pos et al. (2022) for other species described by Cresson and housed at ANSP (e.g., Asthenolabus canadensis (Cresson, 1877)). Despite this discrepancy, Cresson’s (1916: 51) lectotype designation remains valid (following ICZN 1999: Article 74.5), and thus, we can conclude that the lectotype is a male from Canada. A final determination cannot be made for the sex of the specimen from Connecticut, at this stage, and a more thorough study of the ANSP collection may provide further insights. Diagnosis. Eparces quadriceps is differentiated from congeners by the following combination of characters: primarily brownish-red to light brownish-red with head and T5–7 dark brown to black (head light brownish-red in E. australis); female head shorter than in E. australis; and posterior transverse carina of propodeum always well developed. Description. Female (Fig. 3). Body length 7.4–8.5 mm; fore wing length 3.6–4.0 mm. Color. Primarily brownish-red to light brownish-red except: head black except mandibles dark red medially; antenna with scape, pedicel and flagellomeres 1–3/4 yellowish-brown to light brown, flagellomeres 4–5 brown, flagellomeres 7–10 yellowish-white to yellow, remainder dark brown; middle and hind legs with femora (except basal 0.1/0.3) and tibiae (except basal 0.2 of middle tibia) dark reddish-brown to black; middle and hind tarsomere 5 dark reddish-brown; T5–7 dark reddish-brown to black. Head. Clypeus smooth to weakly granulate with a few scattered, coarse punctures. Supraclypeal area granulate and sparsely, shallowly punctate. Gena granulate and sparsely, shallowly punctate. Supra-antennal area granulate with dorsal 0.3/0.5 transversely rugulose, dorsal 0.5/0.7 with a few scattered, shallow punctures. Vertex granulate with scattered, nearly indistinct punctures. Antenna with 20–21 flagellomeres. Mesosoma. Pronotum weakly granulate, punctation varying from absent to a few shallow, indistinct punctures. Mesonotum and scutellum smooth to weakly granulate with scattered, indistinct punctures. Mesopleuron smooth to weakly granulate, punctation varying from nearly absent to moderately punctate. Speculum smooth to granulate, impunctate to sparsely punctate. Ventral division of metapleuron granulate, impunctate or with a few scattered, shallow punctures. Propodeum granulate, impunctate. Propodeal carinae usually subobsolete (occasionally obsolete or well developed), except posterior transverse carina always well developed. Metasoma. Granulate, impunctate. Male (Fig. 4). Body length: 8.2–9.3 mm; fore wing length: 3.9–4.6 mm. As in female except: flagellum brownish-red becoming dark brown apically; middle leg with less extensive brown area; hind leg often with tarsus dark brown; head shorter; punctation denser on supraclypeal area, mesonotum, mesopleuron and ventral division of metapleuron; supra-antennal area more coarsely rugulose. Antennae with 23–24 flagellomeres. Material examined. Non-types: CANADA • ♂; Ontario; Algonquin Province Park; [45.8371 -78.3791]; 13.viii.1974; B. & C. Dasch; EMUSENT00006086 • ♂; Québec; 3 mi W Québec; [46.8095 -71.2990]; 04.viii.1981; B. & C. Dasch; EMUSENT00005602 • ♂; Québec; St. Esprit; [45.8997 -73.6660]; 21.viii.1956; H. & M. Townes; EMUSENT00004863 • ♂; Toronto; Swansea; [43.6416 -79.447]; 30.vii.1938; H. S. Parish; EMUSENT00004694. USA • ♂; Connecticut; New London Co.; North Stonington; [41.4410 -71.8815], 21.vii.1946; M. Townes; EMUSENT00004527 • ♂; Connecticut; Windham Co.; Canterbury [41.6984 -71.9079]; 25.vii.1937; M. Chapman; EMUSENT00004162 • ♀; Maryland; Prince George’s Co.; Bowie; [39.0068 -76.7791]; 09.x.1943; H. & M. Townes; EMUSENT00005137 • ♂; Maine; Penobscot Co.; 4.5 mi W Bangor; [44.8021 -68.7711]; 12.viii.1986; B. & C. Dasch; EMUSENT00005707 • ♂; Rhode Island; Washington Co.; Westerly; [41.3776 - 71.8273]; 23.vii.1936; M. Chapman; EMUSENT00004545 • ♀; Rhode Island; Washington Co.; Westerly; [41.3776 -71.8273]; 20.viii.1951; H. & M. Townes; EMUSENT00004548 • ♂; Michigan; Huron Mountains; 27.vii.1959; Henry Townes; EMUSENT00004879 • ♂; Michigan; Cheboygan Co.; Mackinaw City; [45.7781 -84.7281]; 04.viii.1980; B. & C. Dasch; EMUSENT00006214 • ♂; Michigan; Washtenaw Co.; Ann Arbor; [42.2760 -83.7381]; 21–23.vii.1971; Peter Rush; EMUSENT00004592 • ♂; New York; Hancock; [41.9555 -75.2810]; 03.viii.1935; H. K. Townes; EMUSENT00005251 • ♂; New York; Tompkins Co.; Ithaca; [42.4440 -76.5018]; 02.viii.1952; Dasch; EMUSENT00005586 • ♀; New York; Tompkins Co.; Ithaca; [42.4440 -76.5018]; 31.v.1950; EMUSENT00005800 • 2♂♂; New York; Tompkins Co.; McLean Bogs; [42.5487 -76.2660]; vii.1951; Dasch; EMUSENT00005907, EMUSENT00005797 • ♀; Pennsylvania; Tioga Co.; Gaines; [41.7520 -77.5578]; 06.vi.1985; B. & C. Dasch; trap; EMUSENT00005678 • ♂; South Carolina; Oconee Co.; 12 mi NW Walhalla, Oconee State Park; [34.8654, -83.1055]; 03.vi–13.viii.1981; S. B. Peck; EMUSENT00004508 • ♀; Tennessee; Blount Co.; GSMNP; Cades Cove; Wildcat Branch; [35.5794 -83.8352]; old field-forest edge; 549m; 02.vii.2004; Steck & Sutton et al.; UCFC235733. Distribution. CANADA (Cresson 1867): Ontario (Townes & Townes 1951); Québec (Provancher 1882); USA: Connecticut (Cresson 1867); Maine (new record); Maryland (new record); Michigan (Carlson 1979); New Hampshire (new record) New York (Bradley 1918; 1926; Cushman 1928); Pennsylvania (new record); Rhode Island (new record); South Carolina (new record); Tennessee (new record); Virginia (Townes & Townes 1951) (Fig. 5).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».