Dictionaries for Sentiment Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This repository was created for my Master's thesis in Computational Intelligence and Internet of Things at the University of Córdoba, Spain. The purpose of this repository is to store the dictionaries found that were used in some of the studies that served as research material for this Master's thesis. Below are the dictionaries specified, along with the details of their references, authors, and download sources. ----------- SentiWordNet 3.0 ---------------- SentiWordNet is based on WordNet 2.0 and has been built by automatically associating each WordNet synset to three scores: Obj for objective terms, Pos and Neg for positive and negative terms. Each score ranges from 0.0 to 1.0. Reference: Catelli, R.; Pelosi, S.;Esposito, M. "Lexicon-Based vs.Bert-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study in Italian". Electronics 2022, 11, 374.https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030374 Download source: https://github.com/aesuli/sentiwordnet File name: SentiWordNet_3.0.0.txt ----------- Multi-perspective Question Answering (MPQA) Subjectivity Lexicon ---------------- The MPQA Subjectivity Lexicon has 8222 words: 2719 positive, 4914 negative and 591 neutral words. It includes adjectives, adverbs, verbs, nouns and 'anypos' (any part-of-speech). The lexicon was aggregated from a variety of sources, including manually developed sources as well as automatically constructed sources. Reference: Khoo, Christopher SG, and Sathik Basha Johnkhan. "Lexicon-based sentiment analysis: Comparative evaluation of six sentiment lexicons". Journal of Information Science 44.4 (2018): 491-511. Download source: http://mpqa.cs.pitt.edu/lexicons/subj_lexicon/ File name: subjectivity_clues_hltemnlp05.zip ----------- NRC Word-Emotion Association Lexicon ---------------- The NRC: National Research Council Canada (NRC) Word-Sentiment Association Lexicon (aka EmoLex) is one of the most well-known domain-specific lexicons incorporating the sentiment polarity and the emotions in the same lexicon for a crowd-sourcing scenario. Reference: Taborda, Bruno, et al. "SA-MAIS: Hybrid automatic sentiment analyser for stock market". Journal of Information Science (2023): 01655515231171361. Download source: https://saifmohammad.com/WebPages/NRC-Emotion-Lexicon.htm File name: NRC-Emotion-Lexicon.zip ----------- Sentiment Italian Lexicon ---------------- The Sentiment Italian Lexicon (Sentix) is a lexicon for Sentiment Analysis of Italian. It is the result of the alignment of several resources: WordNet , MultiWordNet, BabelNet and SentiWordNet. Reference: TWITA. (s. f.). https://valeriobasile.github.io/twita/sentix.html Download source: https://valeriobasile.github.io/twita/downloads.html File name: sentix.gz ----------- SentIta ---------------- SentIta is a sentiment lexicon for the Italian language that has been semiautomatically generated on the base of the richness of the Italian lexical databases of Nooj (Silberztein, 2003; Vietri, 2014) and the Italian Lexicon-grammar (LG) resources (Elia et al., 1981; Elia, 1984). Reference: Pelosi, S. SentIta and Doxa. "Italian Databases and Tools for Sentiment Analysis Purposes". In Proceedings of the Second ItalianConference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015; Accademia University Press: Turin, Italy, 2015; pp. 226–231. https://books.openedition.org/aaccademia/1537 Download source: https://github.com/NicGian/SentITA File name: sentita_0.2.0.zip ----------- The Distributional Polarity Lexicon ----------------The Distributional Polarity Lexicons (DPLs) are large-scale polarity lexicons acquired with an unsupervised methodology and are publicly available in English and Italian. In this page I uploaded 4 lexicons in English and Italian. In each language we release two versions of the lexicons. The first version contains a list of plain words with polarity scores, e.g. good, suffered, loved, smile. The second version contains a list of words that have been pre-processed, to produce lemma::pos pairs, i.e. good::j indicates the adjective good, while pain::n indicates the noun pain. We call the plain words lexicon DPL-EN and DPL-IT, respectively for English and Italian. The pre-processed versions are called DPLp-EN and DPLp-IT, respectively for English and Italian. References: Castellucci, G., Croce, D., & Basili, R. (2016). "A language independent method for generating large scale polarity lexicons". Language Resources and Evaluation, 38-45. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L16-1007.pdf Distributional Polarity Lexicon | Semantic Analytics Group @ Uniroma2. (s. f.). http://sag.art.uniroma2.it/demo-software/distributional-polarity-lexicon/ Download source: http://sag.art.uniroma2.it/demo-software/distributional-polarity-lexicon/ Files names: DPL-EN_lrec2016.txt.gz DPL-IT_lrec2016.txt.gz DPLp-EN_lrec2016.txt.gz DPLp-IT_lrec2016.txt.gz ----------- SenticNet ---------------- SenticNet is a sentiment lexicon for concept-level sentiment analysis that was automatically constructed by applying graph-mining and multi-dimensional scaling techniques on the affective commonsense knowledge collected from three different sources, namely: WordNet-Affect, Open Mind Common Sense and GECKA. It performs tasks such as polarity detection and emotion recognition. It supports different languages such as English, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Italian, Russian, Turkish, Korean, Polish, Indonesian and more. References: Cambria, E.; Li, Y.; Xing, F.Z.; Poria, S.; Kwok, K. "SenticNet 6: Ensemble Application of Symbolic and Subsymbolic AI for Sentiment Analysis". In Proceedings of the CIKM '20: The 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Virtual Event, Ireland, 19–23 October 2020; d'Aquin, M., Dietze, S., Hauff, C., Curry, E., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Eds.; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 105–114. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3340531.3412003 SenticNet. (s. f.). https://sentic.net/ Download source: https://sentic.net/downloads/ File name: senticnet.zip (file is in English language, for files in other languages please use the download source)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,145 | 0,144 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».