MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949193101 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15149368

Sclerocoelus Marshall 1995

2025· article· en· W6949193101 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaPouchGenusSexual dimorphismTaxonomy (biology)Type species

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Genus Sclerocoelus Marshall, 1995 Sclerocoelus Marshall, 1995: 283 (masculine). Type species: Limosina sordipes Adams, 1904, original designation. Sclerocoelus – Marshall 1997: 97 [diagnosis, phylogeny, key, illustrations]. — Roháček et al. 2001: 248 [world catalog]. Diagnosis Almost all Sclerocoelus species exhibit the following combination of characters: (1) very broad lunule; (2) very broad alula; (3) a proximal posterodorsal seta on the mid tibia; (4) well-developed postsutural intra-alar bristle; and (5) complex male genital pouch composed of several additional sclerites. Other diagnostic characters include (6) a midventral seta on the female mid tibia (absent in males) and (7) costa terminating at the end of R 4+5. Some species lack the proximal posterodorsal mid tibial seta (S. mandibulum sp. nov. and S. argentinensis sp. nov.), however all other diagnostic characters are present in these species. One of the brachypterous species of Sclerocoelus (S. aduncus sp. nov.) has a small alula but has all other diagnostic characters of the genus (the other brachypterous species have a very broad alula). Sclerocoelus inornatus sp. nov. and S. lutosus sp. nov. lack the distinctively sclerotized male genital pouch that characterizes other Sclerocoelus species, but they do have the other defining characters of Sclerocoelus as listed above (with the possible exception of the dimorphic mid tibia in S. inornatus, as no females are known). A morphological phylogeny (Fig. 2) suggests that the relatively simple genital pouch of these species represents a character reversal rather than a plesiomorphic trait, however neither species was available for sequencing. Redescription BODY. Colour yellow to dark brown. Length 1.8–5.3 mm. HEAD. Brown, variable portion of frons orange; face, gena, and antennae orange to brown; frontal vitta, interfrontal plate and orbital plate subshining, indistinctly microtomentose. Frontal width 2.2–2.4 × frontal height. Two or three pairs of strong interfrontal bristles usually surmounting a very fine third or fourth pair; two strong lateroclinate orbital bristles, anterior orbital 0.4–0.7 × length of posterior; ocellar bristle large and diverging; postocellar bristle small; inner and outer vertical bristles large; inner and outer occipital bristles large. Vibrissa large, vibrissal angle with one subvibrissal seta; gena with an enlarged anteroventral seta and several smaller setae. Palpus yellow to brown, clavate, with two large preapical ventral setulae. Lunule usually broad, bulging and prominent, always broader in female than male; face slightly excavated and usually short, medially about 0.3–1.5× as tall as lunule, medial keel short and usually only slightly developed. Antennae divergent; pedicel with long marginal setae; postpedicel ovoid, somewhat flattened on outer surface; arista long-pubescent. Eye variable but usually large, greatest height 1.1–5.0× shortest genal height, posteroventral corner concave from broadened gena. THORAX. Brown, scutum paler laterally. One or two (usually) distinct postsutural dorsocentral bristles, anterior pair sometimes reduced, 0.3–0.7 × length of posterior (prescutellar) pair, separated by 4–12 rows of acrostichal setulae. Two postpronotal bristles, outer bristle large and inner bristle small; two notopleural bristles, anterior slightly larger than posterior; two strong supra-alar bristles; postalar and intrapostalar bristles large; prescutellar acrostichal setulae usually enlarged (3.0–4.0 × length of anterior setulae). Prosternum linear, membrane around prosternum usually bare but sometimes with additional setulae-bearing sclerites. Katepisternum with a very fine anterior setula and a large posterior bristle. Scutellum subtriangular, 1.3× as wide as long, with four long marginal bristles in usual positions. LEGS. Brown to yellow. Fore femur with 3–5 large ventral preapical setae. Dorsal surface of mid tibia with three (one small and one large anterior and one small posterior) proximal setae and three (one small and one large anterior and one large posterior) distal setae except in male S. mandibulum sp. nov. Ventral surface of male mid tibia with an apicoventral bristle and two rows of stout setae in apical quarter to two-thirds, mid femur with two corresponding rows of stout proximal setae; ventral surface of female mid tibia with strong midventral bristle and long apicoventral bristle. Mid basitarsus with distinctly enlarged basal ventral setula. Hind tibia with stout apicoventral seta. WING. Hyaline to infuscate. CS2 0.6–1.0 × CS3. R 2+3 sinuate, basal curve almost straight and distal curve strong; R 4+5 slightly sinuate, ending just before wing tip; costa ending at or extending just beyond end of R 4+5 (1–3× costal width). M 1 extending to wing tip as distinct sinuate crease. M 4 extending past dm-m 1.1–1.3 × length of dm-m. CuA+CuP sinuate, almost reaching wing margin. Alula almost always large, ovoid. Halter pale brown to brown. MALE ABDOMEN. Dark brown, posterior edges of tergites usually slightly desclerotized. T2–5 and S2–4 long-setose with large posterolateral setae. S5 highly variable, usually rectangular; posteromedial chaetotaxy variable. Genital pouch including multiple sclerites, most of which seem to be derived from the ventral part of S6+7 (sclerites A–E, as defined in Materials and Methods). Epandrium variable, usually wedge-shaped, and uniformly long-setose; perianal pads usually weakly developed and membranous, but sometimes sclerotized and enlarged. Cercus usually weakly differentiated from epandrium, usually widely separated but sometimes entirely or partially fused medially to form subanal plate; pseudocercus usually small and separated from epandrium, sometimes fused to inner ventral corners of epandrium or entirely absent; when present, almost always with three setae. Halves of subepandrial sclerite usually strongly arched and joined medially. Subcercus usually large and complex. Hypandrium usually large; anteromedial hypandrial apodeme elongate but usually shorter than phallapodeme; lateral hypandrial arm strongly arched, separate from anteroventral corner of epandrium and usually separate from anteromedial hypandrial apodeme (fused to anteromedial apodeme in S. punensis sp. nov., S. paranebulosus sp. nov. and S. penai sp. nov.). Surstylus variable, usually larger than subcercus. Postgonite variable. Phallapodeme large, curved, sometimes dorsoventrally flattened apically; basiphallus variable, often stout with a neck-like distal part, epiphallus variably developed; distiphallus usually small, largely membranous, and supported by numerous sinuate sclerites. FEMALE ABDOMEN. Dark brown, edges of preabdominal sclerites, especially sternites, usually desclerotized. T2–6 and S2–6 uniformly long-setose with longer posterolateral setae. T7 broad, rectangular; T8 either desclerotized dorsomedially, appearing as two large lateral sclerites, or divided into pale dorsal sclerite and two dark lateral sclerites, posteromedial corners of lateral sclerites usually expanded posteriorly. Epiproct usually large, shield-like and often desclerotized along midline, appearing as two separate sclerites, usually densely setulose, almost always with pair of large dorsal setae. Cercus variable, usually elongate, always densely setulose, usually with large apical and dorsal setae. S7 broad, often pointed posteromedially, long-setose with 4–6 distinctly enlarged, preapical, posterior setae; S8 usually highly reduced, often divided into two small, lateral sclerites each with two minute sensory setulae, though sometimes with only a single large, medial sclerite or entirely membranous/absent. Hypoproct large, broad, U-shaped, densely setulose posteriorly with 5–16 distinct setae. Three or (rarely) two spermathecae, bulb various, sometimes spherical or cylindrical but asymmetrically bean-shaped in one major clade, often with 1–2 invaginations, invaginations sometimes with a finger-like, central process pointing outwards; paired spermathecae (when present) smaller than single spermatheca; ducts short. Similar and related genera Marshall & Dong (2008) noted superficial similarities between the widespread southern hemisphere genus Parasclerocoelus and some species of Sclerocoelus, including a large intra-alar bristle, sinuate R 2+3, almost straight R 4+5, a double row of stout setae on the apicoventral surface of the mid tibia, large S6–8, pruinose thorax and similar female terminalia. However, Parasclerocoelus has a narrow alula, a small lunule and no posterior proximal seta on the mid tibia. Its male genital pouch includes an arm of S6 that extends across the anterior face of the genital pouch but lacks the multiple genital pouch sclerites that define Sclerocoelus. The only species of the high Andean genus Paramosina is also externally similar to sympatric species of Sclerocoelus. Marshall & Yau (2014) noted the broad lunule and broad alula as similarities, but noted the simple male genital pouch, complete subanal plate, well-developed cerci and epiproct in the female as significant differences between the two genera. The male S6 is divided into two ventral lobes in Paramosina, but it does not break into separate pieces ventrally as in Sclerocoelus. Paramosina also differs from Sclerocoelus in lacking the posterior proximal seta on the mid tibia in both sexes and in lacking the midventral mid tibial bristle in females. Nine species of Sclerocoelus were collected along with the type series of Paramosina hirsuta Marshall, 2014 at 3600 m a.s.l. (Quebrada Mishahuaycu, Ecuador). Males of the small African genus Parapoecilosomella Papp, 2008 have a large genital pouch superficially similar to some Sclerocoelus, but the two species of Parapoecilosomella differ so widely from Sclerocoelus in wing venation and other features it seems unlikely that there is a close relationship. Marshall (2000) suggested Sclerocoelus as a possible sister group to the mostly Neotropical gen

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,061

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,155 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→Travaux en français237 207→