Paraxenopygus peruvianus Bernhauer 1915
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paraxenopygus peruvianus Bernhauer, 1915 (Figures 1C, 2C, 3C, 4C, 5G–I, 6) Paraxenopygus peruvianus Bernhauer, 1915, p. 298. Type material Lectotype, here designated, male with labels: ‘ Chanchamayo, Peru [Peru: Junín: Chanchamayo, −11.00°, −75.25°] Heyne [leg.] Berlin-Wilm’ /‘ ♀ ’/ ‘ peruvianus Bernh Typus’ / ‘ Chicago NHMus M. Bernhauer Collection’ /‘FMNHINS4518387 ’/‘ Lectotype Paraxenopygus peruvianus Bernhauer des. Chatzimanolis, Brunke and Navarrete-Heredia’. In the collection of FMNH. Additional materials COLOMBIA: Antioquia: Rionegro [6.15°, −75.37°], Bernhauer coll. (1 female FMNH); ECUADOR: Orellana: [Puerto Francisco de Orellana] Coca [−0.46°, −76.98°], v.1965, Peña coll. FMNHINS4518388 (1 male [lacking barcode], 1 female FMNH); PERU: Cuzco: Quispicanchi, Marcapata [−13.59°, −70.98°], Fauvel coll. (1 female HNHM; 2 male, 2 female RISBN); Huánuco: Monzon Valley, Tinga María [−9.29°, −75.99°], 27.x.1954, E.I. Schlinger and E.S. Ross leg. (1 male, 1 female CAS); Yurao, 67.5 mi. E. of Tingo María [−9.29°, −75.04°], 16.xi.1954, E.I. Schlinger and E.S. Ross leg. (1 female CAS); Junín: Chanchamayo [−11.00°, −75.25°], Sharp coll. (1 male NHMUK); same locality, 800 m, 1.ii.1939, in nest with Atta cephalotes, Scheerpeltz coll. (1 female NMW); Pasco: Villa Rica Rd. [−10.79°, −75.32°], 1475 m, 15–18.x.1999, FIT, R. Brooks, D. Brzoska leg., SM0149866 (1 female SEMC); Madre de Dios: CICRA Field Station, airfield, −12.558°, −70.106°, 290 m, 11.vii.2010, hand collected, DJ Bennett leg., SEMC0985413 (1 male SEMC); CICRA Field Station, trail 6, research plot, −12.552°, −70.109°, 295 m, 7–9.vi.2011, FIT, Chaboo team leg., SEMC1014435 (1 male SEMC); CICRA Field Station, garden, −12.569°, −70.101°, 260 m, 12–19.vii.2010, malaise, M.J. Endara leg., SEMC1095993 (1 male SEMC); same locality and collector, 9–16.ix.2010, SEMC1097837, SEMC1097839 (2 male SEMC); same locality and collector, 23.ix.–2.x.2010, SEMC1062346 (1 female SEMC); same locality and collector, 26. viii.–2.ix.2010, SEMC1061639 (1 female SEMC); Pakitza Biol. Station Castanal Trail, Reserved Zone, Manu NP [−11.945°, −71.283°], 317 m, 15–16.x.2000, FIT, R. Brooks leg., SM0210549 (1 female SEMC); Pantiacolla Lodge 2–7 km NW El Mirador trail, Alto Madre de Dios River [−12.653°, −71.258°], 450–700 m, 23–26.x.2000, FIT, R. Brooks leg., SM0210968 (1 female SEMC); same locality and date, 8 km NW El Mirador Trail, 800 m, [−12.642°, −71.278°], SM0210921 (1 male SEMC); unknown state: unknown locality, Bang-Haas [leg.] (1 female AMNH); unknown locality (1 female NHMUK; 1 female MFNB). Diagnosis Among species of Paraxenopygus with metallic green head and pronotum, P. peruvianus can be distinguished from P. newtoni by having a pronotum with dense setose punctures in confused rows, nearly evenly distributed (Figure 2C); tergite 7 with dark median band (Figure 1C); apex of median lobe in ventral view converging to narrow rounded tip (Figure 5G); and median lobe in lateral view with subapical tooth (Figure 5I). Description Forebody length 6.1–8.5 mm. Colour of head and pronotum shining metallic green; mesoscutellum, elytra, antennae and legs orange-brown. Abdomen orange-brown (but see Remarks below) except tergite 7 and sternite 7 with broad dark brown to black area medially (Figure 4C). Epicranium (Figure 2C) with small to medium punctures, distance between punctures as wide as 1–1.5 punctures. Antennomere 1–4 without tomentose pubescence. Mandibles straight, except apically. Neck with dense, small punctures. Pronotum width/length ratio = 0.96–1.00; pronotum with medium-sized punctures; pronotum with rows of punctures confused and nearly becoming evenly distributed (Figure 2C); superior marginal line of pronotal hypomeron joins inferior marginal line before neck. Elytra length/pronotal length ratio = 1.06–1.15; elytra with small punctures and few wrinkled irregularities between punctures. Metacoxal shield slightly elongate and wide (Figure 3C), but length of shield variable (see Discussion); abdominal tergites 3–4 without faint curved line posterior to anterior transverse basal line. Sternite 7 in males with small circular porose structure (Figure 4C); sternite 8 with U-shaped emargination (Figure 4C). Aedeagus as in Figure 5G–I; in ventral view paramere wide, converging to rounded apex; paramere shorter and narrower than median lobe; in lateral view paramere concave, with narrower rounded apex; paramere with peg setae in two short rows as in Figure 5H. Median lobe in ventral view wide, converging to narrow rounded tip; in lateral view median lobe becoming much narrower near apex; median lobe with subapical tooth. Endophallus in ventral view wide, converging to pointed apex, in lateral view converging to narrow rounded apex. Distribution Known from the department of Antioquia in Colombia, the province of Orellana in Ecuador, and the departments of Cuzco, Huánuco, Junín, Pasco and Madre de Dios in Peru (Figure 6). There is a female specimen of Paraxenopygus in FMNH from Tobago (10 km NE Roxborough, Gilpin Trail, 400–500 m, Montane Rain Forest, 26–31.vi.1993, FIT, S. and J. Peck leg.) that is similar to P. peruvianus but the punctation pattern of the pronotum is a bit more sparse. This specimen may be P. peruvianus or a new species, but unfortunately we are unable to make a determination. Habitat Collected in low- and mid-elevation tropical rainforests. There is one record indicating a host association with Atta cephalotes (Linnaeus). Remarks In a couple of specimens, the abdomen was much darker, almost brown, but no differences in the aedeagi were found.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».