MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949218923 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1477376

Small Scale LNG Terminals Market is Expected to Exceed 102 MMTPA by 2022

2018· article· en· W6949218923 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMarket shareSWOT analysisScale (ratio)Market penetrationFossil fuelScope (computer science)Liquefied natural gasNatural gasMarket researchKey (lock)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

New York, September 22, 2018: Market Research Engine has published a new report titled as “Small Scale LNG Terminals Market by Technology (Liquefaction and Regasification) and by Type (Onshore and Offshore) - Global Industry Analysis and Forecast 2016 – 2022”.\n\n\nThe report covers detailed competitive outlook including the market share and company profiles of the key participants operating in the global market. Key players profiled in the report include Skangass AS, LindeAG,Prometheus Energy and Plum Energy. Company profile includes assign such as company summary, financial summary, business strategy and planning, SWOT analysis and current developments. \n \nThe Top Companies Report is intended to provide our buyers with a snapshot of the industry’s most influential players. \n\n\n The scope of the report includes a detailed study of global and regional markets for Small Scale LNG Terminals with the reasons given for variations in the growth of the industry in certain regions.\n\n\nThe small scale LNG terminals market is expected to exceed more than 102 MMTPA by 2022; Growing at a CAGR of more than 10% in the given forecast period.\n\n\nBrowse Full Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/reportdetails/small-scale-lng-terminals-market\n\n\nLNG is progressively rising as one of the most preferred fuels worldwide. It is being used by various end user businesses. The main benefits of utilizing LNG as a fuel are its clean burning nature that considerably lowers emissions as compared to alternative fossil fuels. Presently there is a discrete variance in the global natural gas development with key manufacturers exporting a bulk of their creation and main customers being heavily dependent on imports. In such a situation, there is an increasing need for LNG transportation globally. Since transportation of natural gas in liquid form is regularly cheaper and mainly cost effective than construction pipelines. Although huge amount of LNG terminals have been preferably built across the globe till today’s date the emergence of little demand centers for natural gas within small geographies is steadily changing the focal point towards miniaturizing LNG infrastructure.\n\n\nThis report provides:\n\n1) An overview of the global market for small scale LNG terminals and related technologies.\n2) Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2015, estimates for 2016 and 2017, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2024.\n3) Identifications of new market opportunities and targeted promotional plans for small scale LNG terminals.\n4) Discussion of research and development, and the demand for new products and new applications.\n5) Comprehensive company profiles of major players in the industry.\n\n\nThe Small Scale LNG Terminals Market has been segmented as below: \n\n\nThe small scale LNG terminals market is segmented on the Basis of Type Analysis and Geographical Analysis.By Type Analysisthis market is segmented on the basis of Liquefaction terminals type and Regasification terminals type.Liquefaction terminals by type is segmented into Onshore and Offshore.Regasification terminals by type is segmented into Onshore and Offshore.\n    \nBy Geographical Analysisthis market is segmented on the basis of North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World.\n\n\nBuy Report from here: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/reportdetails/small-scale-lng-terminals-market\n\n\nTable of Contents\n\n\n1 INTRODUCTION\n\n\n2 Executive Summary\n\n\n3 Small Scale LNG Terminals Market – Industry Analysis\n\n\n3.1 Introduction\n\n\n3.2 Value Chain Analysis: Small Scale LNG Terminals Market\n\n\n3.3 Market Drivers\n\n\n     3.3.1 Security Of Gas Supply In Small Demand Centers And Development Of Small Gas Fields Has Led To Investment In Small Scale LNG Terminals\n\n\n     3.3.2 Preference Of Large Long Haul Vehicle Fleet Owners Towards Adopting LNG As An Alternative Fuel Source\n\n\n            3.3.2.1 Vehicle emission norms in South and North American countries\n\n\n                      3.3.2.1.1 U.S.\n\n\n                      3.3.2.1.2 Canada\n\n\n                      3.3.2.1.3 Mexico\n\n\n     3.3.3 Slumping Energy Prices Are Now Attracting More Investment In Small LNG Terminals Over The Mega Projects\n\n\n3.4 Market Restraints\n\n\n     3.4.1 Infrastructure Development Issues And Lack Of Constant Demand From End-User Segments\n\n\n3.5 Market Opportunities\n\n\n     3.5.1 Increasing LNG Bunkering Requirements In Emission Control Areas (ECAs) To Attract Investment In Small Scale LNG Terminals\n\n\n            3.5.1.1 Sulfur and Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Limits Achieved Using Various Bunker Fuel Grades\n\n\n            3.5.1.2 Global Offshore Oil and Gas Production Estimates and Forecast, by Region, 2013 – 2020 (Million Barrels/ Day)\n\n\n3.6 Porter’s five forces analysis: Small Scale LNG Terminals Market\n\n\n     3.6.1 Bargaining power of suppliers\n\n\n     3.6.2 Bargaining power of buyers\n\n\n     3.6.3 Threat from new entrants\n\n\n     3.6.4 Degree of competition\n\n\n     3.6.5 Threat from substitutes\n\n\n3.7 Market Attractiveness Analysis\n\n\n     3.7.1 Market Attractiveness Analysis of Global Small Scale LNG Terminals Market, by Region, 2013\n\n\n4 Small Scale LNG Terminals Market: Technology Analysis\n\n\n5 Small Scale LNG Terminals Market: Regional Analysis\n\n\n6 Company Profiles\n\n\n6.1 Skangass AS\n\n\n6.2 Emirates Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) LLC\n\n\n6.3 PT DonggiSenoro LNG\n\n\n6.4 Prometheus Energy Company\n\n\n6.5 Petroliam NasionalBerhad (PETRONAS)\n\n\n6.6 Linde AG\n\n\n6.7 Santos Ltd\n\n\n6.8 Plum Energy, LLC\n\n\n6.9 EcoEléctrica Inc.\n\n\n6.10 Nippon Gas Co., Ltd.\n\n\nMedia Contact\n\n\nCompany Name: Market Research Engine\n\n\nContact Person: John Bay\n\n\nEmail: john@marketresearchengine.com\n\n\nPhone: +1-855-984-1862\n\n\nCountry: United States\n\n\nWebsite: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,625
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4330,025

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyTravaux en français237 207