MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949261584 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12727231

Ptychognathus riedelii

2024· article· en· W6949261584 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Établissements canadiensCégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTable (database)New guineaBarrel (horology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ptychognathus riedelii (A. Milne-Edwards, 1868) (Fig. 9A–H, 10A–B) Gnathograpsus Riedelii A. Milne-Edwards, 1868: 182, pl. 27, figs 1–5 [type locality: Sulawesi (Celebes), Indonesia]. Ptychognathus riedelii riedelii.— De Man, 1892: 323. Ptychognathus riedelii.— Tesch, 1918: 87.— Cai & Ng 2001: 686, fig. 16. Ptychognathus andamanica Alcock, 1900: 404, pl. LXV, figs 3, 3a. Type material. Syntypes: MNHN-IU-2000-3402 (= MNHN-B3402), 1 ♂, dry specimen, 23.2 mm × 20.4 mm, Sulawesi, Indonesia, coll. M. Riedel; MNHN-IU-2000-3627 (= MNHN-B MNHN-3627): 2 ♂ and 1 ♀, dry specimens, Sulawesi, Indonesia, coll. M. Riedel. Other material examined. SAMOA. Upolu: MNHN-IU-2022-4114 (DNA voucher: CA2660), 1 ♂, 26.7 mm × 26.27; MNHN-IU-2019-8 (DNA voucher: CA2492), 1 ♂, 20.8 mm × 17.9 mm, Pineula River, 14°01.780'S, 171°37.003'W, 20 m a.s.l., coll. P. Gerbeaux, G. Marquet & P. Keith 25 July 2004. INDONESIA. Papua: MNHNIU-2018-2965 (DNA voucher: CA2491), 1 ♂, 19.5 mm × 16.9 mm, SIG 99; MNHN-IU-2018-2643 (DNA voucher: CA2490), 1 ♂, 17.3 mm × 15.1 mm, SIG11. PAPUA NEW GUINEA. New Britain: MNHN-IU-2018-2967 (DNA voucher: CA2456), 1 ♀, 14.2 mm × 12.6 mm, Gavuvu river, 05°28.733'S, 150°23.557'E, coll. R. Causse, P. Keith, C. Lord, P. Amick, 27 October 2018. SOLOMON ISLANDS. Choiseul: MNHN-IU-2018-4124 (DNA voucher: CA2489), 1 ♂, 16.2 mm × 14.6 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4115, 1 ♂, 13.3 mm × 10.8 mm, Lopakare, 07°01.613'S, 156°46.567'E, coll. P. Gerbeaux, P. Keith, G. Marquet, 20 October 2014; MNHN-IU-2018-4132 (DNA voucher: CA2482), 1 ♂, 22.4 mm × 18.8 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4116, 2 ♂, 10.3–21.0 mm × 9.4–17.8 mm and 2 ♀, 13.7–17.6 mm × 12.7–15.6 mm, Lopakare, 07°01.834'S, 156°45.789'E, coll. P. Gerbeaux, P. Keith, G. Marquet, 21 October 2014. Kolombangara: MNHN-IU-2018-2647 (DNA voucher: CA2483), 1 ♂, 10.0 mm × 8.9 mm, Pointete River, 07°52.413'S, 157°07.982'E, coll. P. Keith, C. Lord, G. Marquet, 15 November 2015; MNHN-IU-2018-4129 (DNA voucher: CA2486), 1 ♂, 21.3 mm × 16.6 mm, Vanga 1 River, 07°55.172'S, 156°57.798'E, coll. P. Keith, C. Lord, G. Marquet, 18 November 2015; MNHN-IU-2018-4120 (DNA voucher: CA2488), 1 ♂, 19.2 mm × 17.1 mm; MNHNIU-2022-4117, 1 ♂, 11.7 mm × 10.5 mm and 1 ♀, 11.8 mm × 10.7 mm, Liva River, 08°03.881'S, 157°10.421'E, coll. P. Keith, C. Lord, G. Marquet, 11 November 2015; MNHN-IU-2018-2651 (DNA voucher: CA2487), 1 ♂, 11.8 mm × 9.6 mm, Pipiro River, 07°53.083'S, 157°08.195'E, coll. P. Keith, C. Lord, G. Marquet, 13 November 2015. Vella Lavella: MNHN-IU-2018-2645 (DNA voucher: CA2484), 1 ♀, 10.8 mm × 10.0 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4118: 1 ♀, 9.7 mm × 9.2 mm, Vala Kadju River, 07°49.860'S, 156°42.644'E, coll. C. Lord & P. Keith, 28 October 2016,; MNHN-IU-2018-4128 (DNA voucher: CA2485), 1 ♂, 18.6 mm × 17.1 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4119: 1 ♀, 12.7 mm × 12.1 mm, Maravai River, 07°51.703'S, 156°41.648'E, coll. C. Lord & P. Keith, 31 October 2016. VANUATU. Efate: MNHN-IU-2018-41.768'E (DNA voucher: CA2493), 1 ♂, 20.1 mm × 16.7 mm, Epaule River, 17°33.992'S, 168°27.609'E, coll. P. Feutry, P. Keith, D. Kalfatak, C. Lord, L. Taillebois, 4 February 2010. Pentecost: MNHNIU-2019 (DNA voucher: CA2494), 1 ♂, 17.6 mm × 15.1 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4120: 2 ♂, 12.1–14.9 mm × 11.1– 13.0 mm, Bay Omo River, coll. P. Feutry, P. Keith, D. Kalfatak, C. Lord, L. Taillebois, 26 January 2010. Santo: MNHN-IU-2022-4121 (DNA voucher: CA2456), 1 ♂, 14.6 mm × 12.8 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4122 (DNA voucher: CA2457), 1 ♀, 14.6 mm × 12.8 mm; MNHN-IU-2022-4123: 1 ♀, 14.9 mm × 13.0 mm, Sarataka River, 15°30.060'S, 167°9.259'W, coll. D. Kalfatak, P. Keith & G. Marquet, 25 July 2003. Diagnosis. Carapace quadrate, dorsal surface smooth and flat; front broad, anterior margin slightly concave medially; anterolateral margin with 3 teeth including orbital tooth. Third maxilliped merus, with anterolateral angle strongly inflated, auriculiform; exopod 1.6–2.6 times broader than ischium. Chelipeds large, glabrous, symmetrical in males, fingers with small tuft of setae at tip of pollex. Ambulatory legs with margins setose. Description. Carapace (Fig. 9A) quadrate, slightly broader than long, 1.1 times as wide as long, flat, dorsal surface smooth and glabrous. Regions poorly defined, central H-shaped grooves distinct. Front broad, anterior margin faintly sinuous; frontal width 0.39–0.45 times CW; fronto-orbital width 0.79–0.86 times CW. Upper margin of orbit sinuous. Anterolateral margins and supraorbital margins lined with small granules, each with 3 teeth including orbital tooth; blunt first tooth, largest and more distinct, second and third teeth, less distinct especially the third. Posterolateral margins divergent posteriorly, moderately sloping outwards. Third maxillipeds (Fig. 9B) with ischium subequal in proximal and distal widths, lateral margin concave, ventral surface with longitudinal median ridge. Merus very broad, with anterolateral angle strongly inflated, auriculiform; ventral surface with oblique ridge on mesial part. Exopod very broad, inflated, greatest width 2.1–2.6 times (♂), 1.6–1.9 (♀) of median width of ischium. Male chelipeds (Fig. 9C) symmetrical, not granular at all. Merus longer than broad (length to width ratio 1.3– 1.7), anterior and posterior margins glabrous, posterior distal margins bluntly carinate, directed outward. Carpus, unarmed, strongly inflated, slightly longer than wide (length to width ration 1.0–1.2). Palm inflated, outer surface smooth, without distinct granules; inner surface glabrous. Fingers glabrous except a very characteristic small tuft of setae at tip of pollex. Dactylus distinctly longer than palm, terminating in small, hoof-shaped corneous claw, bearing 10–12 small teeth. Pollex with 5 or 6 teeth, more conical and are larger than those of the dactylus. Without pulvinus at base of fingers. Female chelipeds (Fig. 9D) distinctly smaller than those of male, chela much narrower than in male. Dactylus distinctly shorter than palm, terminating in small, hoof-shaped corneous claw. Fingers with smaller and fewer large teeth. Palm not strongly inflated, outer surface very reticulate-granular; outer surface of palm and pollex outlined near its lower border by fine raised granular line; with characteristic small tuft of setae at tips of pollex as in male. Ambulatory legs (P2–5), slender, somewhat compressed laterally; P4 longest (♂: length 1.4–1.6 times carapace width, ♀: length 1.4–1.5 times carapace width); P5 shortest. Merus elongated, subrectangular in lateral view, unarmed.Anterior margin of merus of P2–5 with long soft setae; posterior margins with sparsely long setae.Anterior margin of carpus with dense short setae, posterior margins glabrous. Propodus with dense short setae and sparsely long setae on anterior margins and posterior margins. Ventral surface with rows of short setae. Dactylus terminating in subacute corneous claw, with short setae on anterior and posterior margins ventral surface with rows of short setae. P3 merus (Fig. 9E) 3.6–4.2 as long as wide, carpus 1.9–2.1 as long as wide, propodus 1.9–2.6 as long as wide dactylus 5.5–7.4 as long as wide, dactylus 0.9–1.2 times as long as propodus. P5 merus (Fig. 9F) 3.3–3.5 as long as wide, carpus 1.7–2.7 as long as wide; propodus 1.2–2.0 as long as wide dactylus 3.3–5.1 as long as wide, dactylus 0.6–0.9 times as long as propodus. Male pleon (Fig. 9G) narrow, broadly triangular, nearly smooth, distinctly narrowed at base of telson; margins covered with short setae, setae on margins of telson longer. Telson linguiform, terminal margin broadly rounded; length 0.9–1.1 times basal width, 0.9–1.0 times long as sixth somite, sixth somite 1.1–1.2 times longer than fifth somite. Female pleon (Fig. 9H) very broad, covering most of thoracic sternum, fourth somite broadest, telson broadly subtriangular, terminal margin broadly rounded, length 0.6–0.7 times basal width, 0.9–1.0 times longer than sixth somite, sixth somite 1.1–1.2 times longer than fifth somite, measured on midline. Male G1 (Fig. 9I) slender, 6 times as long as wide, slightly curving dorsally; tip bluntly rounded, forming short chitinous structure; subdistal lobe obtuse, partially obscured by stiff setae. Colouration in life. Body (Fig. 10A) brownish green to dark brown. Chelipeds (Fig. 10B) rather reddish. Size. Large-sized.The largest male specimen examined is 22.4 mm × 18.8 mm and the largest non-ovigerous female 14.2 mm × 22.6 mm. Habitat. Ptychognathus riedelii is a true freshwater species, not collected in brackish waters. Distribution. Ptychognathus riedelii occurs (Fig. 6) in Indonesia, Philippines, Papua New Guinea (New Britain), Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and Samoa Independent State (Upolu). Remarks. This large species is easily recognizable by its very characteristic small tuft of setae at tips of pollex, both in males and females.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMarine Biology and Ecology Research→Travaux en français237 207→