Notice bibliographique
Résumé
canadian c-spine rules pdf Rating: 4.9 / 5 (2012 votes) Downloads: 35851 = = = = = CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD = = = = = Simple Rear-End MVC Excludes:** Pushed into oncoming traffic. For alert (Glasgow coma scale =) and stable trauma patients where cervical spine injury is a concernAny High-Risk Factor Which Mandates Radiography? Tenderness. It can be used safely in the defined population to minimise the volume of cervical spine radiology ordered for blunt head and neck trauma, without missing clinically significant cervical spine injuries. No The Canadian C-spine Rule helps guide clinicians as to the indications for cervical X-rays for alert and stable adults who have sustained recent blunt trauma and are at risk for clinically important cervical spine injury* Canadian C-Spine RuleINCLUSION CRITERIA (check as applicable) ALERT (GCS) STABLE (SSP >90mmHg, respiratory rate /minute) ACUTE BLUNT INJURY (Canadian C-Spine Rule 2 It is not applicable in non-trauma cases, if the patient has unstable vital signs, acute paralysis, known vertebral disease or previous history of Cervical Spine The Canadian C-Spine RuleAny One. Low-Risk. If this is the case, an X-ray of the cervical spine should be performed Canadian C-Spine Rule. Clinically clears cervical spine fracture without imaging. Motorized Recreational Vehicles. Wide-spread implementation by nurses throughout Canada and Known vertebral disease (ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal stenosis, previous c-spine surgery) Referred from another hospital Does the patient have any exclusion criteria? Why Use. Age ≥years, extremity paresthesias, or dangerous mechanism. When to Use. Pearls/Pitfalls. More recently, our group developed the Canadian C-Spine (cervical-spine) Rule (CCR), for use with alert patients in stable Assessment for cervical spine injuryAssess whether the person is at high, low or no risk for cervical spine injury using the Canadian C-spine rule as follows: the person is The Canadian C-Spine Rule was developed for use in adults who are alert, stable and in whom a clinically important cervical spine injury is a concern (eg, unstable fracture, dislocation). No Radiography Absence of midline C-Spine. Clinically clears cervical spine fracture without imaging. YESProceed to ROM! Dangerous Mechanism* Fall from elevation >feet. Fall from ≥3 ft (m) /stairs, axial load injury, high speed MVC/rollover/ejection, bicycle collision, motorized recreational vehicle. YES— STOP; cant use the Canadian C-Spine Rule NO—CONTINUETHE CANADIAN C-SPINE START HEREAny ONE high-risk factor which mandates The specicity of the modi ed Canadian fi fi. The positive likelihood ratio of the modi ed Canadian The Canadian C-spine Rule and National Emergency X-Radiography Low Risk Criteria (NEXUS) can be used to determine the need for imaging in adults; however, these are not currently validated in paediatricsDownload the C-Spine clearance tool (PDF). Description: The Canadian C-Spine Rule was designed in to assist clinicians assess the need for imaging in people who present to the emergency The Canadian C-Spine Rule is a high-performance rule. As such, the Canadian C-Spine Rule is recommended in many international guidelines for routine use Canadian C-Spine Rule. OR (answer "yes" if no pain) No pain during midline c-spine palpation (answer "yes" if no pain)Patient Voluntarily Able to The Canadian C-Spine Rule is the most rigorously evaluated clinical ision rule, to date, with which to assess the need for cervical spine imaging in adults who present with cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. C-spine rule was % (95% CI, to) when assessed by paramedics, compared with % (95% CI, to) when applied by the investigators. Hit by bus The Canadian C-Spine Rule is applicable to patients who are in an alert (Glasgow Coma Scale score of) and stable condition following trauma where cervical spine injury is a concern. If. N OImaging!If. Factor Which Allows Safe Assessment of Range of Motion? Axial load to head. OR No neck pain at scene when asked. Nurses reported discomfort in applying the Canadian C-Spine Rule in only % of cases. Conclusion: Use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by nurses was accurate, reliable and clinically acceptable. MVC high speed (>mph), rollover, ejection. Its use has been validated in a number of other studies, across a variety of patient % of patients, the cervical spine could be cleared clinic-ally by nurses. CT scan +/ MRI (with urgent Orthopaedic review) should be the initial imaging of choice inInstructions for using the Canadian C-Spine RuleDefine whether any high risk factors are present such as age (≥years) or dangerous mechanism (includes high speed or roll over or ejection, motorised recreation vehicle or bicycle crash). Glasgow coma Scale
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,760 | 0,627 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».