Coproica bifurcata Bergeron, Marshall & Swann, 2015, new species
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Coproica bifurcata new species Figs. 16, 21, 41–52 Description. Body length 1.2–1.7 mm. Body colour brown. Face and frons brown. Interfrontal bristles in 3–4 pairs; postocellar bristles convergent; postocellar setulae absent. Eye to gena ratio approximately 2:1; 4 genal setae in longitudinal row posterior to vibrissa. Scutellum with approximately 10 bristles arranged in 2 rows between basal 1/4 and basal 1/2, posterior row approximately 1.3 times longer than anterior row; 2 lateral bristles present between larger anterior and posterior marginal scutellar bristles. Katepisternum with 2 small dorsal bristles, each approximately 1/5 as long as the distance between dorsal margin of katepisternum and wing base. Legs and fore coxa brown. Mid tibia with 1 proximal posterodorsal bristle at 2/5. Mid basitarsus with row of small, stout anterior bristles beginning at 1/5 and extending to apex, continuous row of small, stout anteroventral bristles, 2–3 small posteroventral bristles, variable in position. Second costal sector 0.8–1.0 times as long as third costal sector. Costal bypass short, terminating within 5 vein widths of R 4+5. Male terminalia: Sternite 5 rounded rectangular, posteromedial patch of slightly dense microtrichia; all discal bristles uniform in size. Sternite 6 straight medially. Epandrium with enlarged pair of dorsolateral bristles; subanal plate incomplete; ventral margin of cerci with strong posteromedial bristled processes, process on left cercus 2 times as long as process on right cercus. Surstylus with rounded posteroventral lobe lined with short bristles, slightly asymmetrical. Postgonites asymmetrical, curved anteriorly; left postgonite thick, with pointed apex; right postgonite narrow distally, bifurcate at apex. Basiphallus gently curved, tubular, closed posteriorly; epiphallus unmodified. Lateral sclerites of distiphallus with sharp posterodorsal angle, row of 3 dorsal processes, proximal process sharp with narrow, pointed medial process, central process broad, blunt, distal process, narrow, sharp, and sinuate; distal ventral angle rounded, protruding. Central sclerite fused with lateral sclerites ventral to central process. Female terminalia: Tergite 8 reduced to 2 long lateral sclerites with medial membrane connecting them. Tergite 10 pollinose, narrowly fused to cerci laterally; cerci conical, pollinose, cercal bristles long and sinuate. Sternite 7 broad, rounded, posterior projection broad and deeply concave, appearing like 2 processes. Sternite 8 with broad anterior process with 2 small lateral points, a large pair of central bristles, and a row of four small setae anterior and posterior to it. Sternite 10 with medial and lateral pairs of enlarged bristles, posterior margin bluntly pointed, not curved dorsally. Spermathecae elongate, pear-shaped; duct length approximately 3 times as long as spermathecal bulb. Type material. Holotype male: ARGENTINA: Salta, Rosario de Lerma, 24.ii.1992, swept over bulldozed rd., S.A. Marshall (DEBU). Paratypes: ARGENTINA: same as holotype (10♂ **–ill–w, 13♀ **–ill.); same as holotype except swept over foul ditch (1♀); Jujuy, Cochinoca, 3700m, 26.ii.1992, sweep small stream, llama dung, debris, S.A. Marshall (2♂ *, 2♀ *); Jujuy, Tres Cruces lakeside, 3700m, 26.ii.1992, sweep, S.A. Marshall (1♂, 1♀); Jujuy, Abra Pampa, 3500 m, 26.ii.1992, llama dung, S.A. Marshall (1♀); Salta, Rosario de Lerma, INESALT, 17– 28.ii.1992, yard pan tps., S.A. Marshall (1♀); Salta, El Rey Nat. Pk., 900m, Aguas Negras Tr., 11–15.xii.1987, for. malaise tp., FIT, S.&J. Peck (4♂ *, 10 ♀ ***); Salta, El Rey Nat. Pk., 900m, Rio La Sala, 5–10.xii.1987, malaise tp., FIT, open stream side in for., S.&J. Peck (9♂ ***, 4♀ *); Salta, El Rey Nat. Pk., 1000m, Pozo Verde trail km. 7, 5– 15.xii.1987, malaise FIT, Yungas for., S.&J. Peck (1♂, 1♀). Other material examined. ARGENTINA: Salta, Cañada la Gotera, 19.ii.1992, sweep/wet litter, S.A. Marshall (4♂, 1♀); Salta, 22 km. N of La Caldera, 1550m, El Ucumar, 2–30.xii.1987, malaise, subtropical humid for., S.&J. Peck (1♂); Salta, 1500m, La Caldera, Camino la Cornisa, 27.ii.1992, roadside for. sweeps, S.A. Marshall (2♂); Salta, Rosario de Lerma, INESALT, 16–28.ii.1992, yard malaise, S.A. Marshall (2♂ *, 53♀ *); Salta, Rosario de Lerma, 24.ii.1992, garbage/mud/creek, S.A. Marshall (1♀). BOLIVIA: Santa Cruz, Campo Guairuy, 24 km. S Camiri, 870m, 18.viii–2.ix.2000, malaise tp., Irwin & Hauser; (16♂: debu00143452, 00143432, 00144411, 00144214*, 00142900, 00143117, 00143087, 00143040, 00146755, 00146667, 00146542, 00143151, 00144325, 00143725, 00143706, 00144381; 37♀: 00143656, 00144231, 00143732, 00144559, 00144550, 00144238, 00144569, 00143418, 00144563, 00144390, 00144122, 00144187, 00144192, 00143011, 00142838, 00142887, 00143090, 00143488, 00143429, 00143420, 00143411, 00143518, 00143347*, 00144040, 00143670, 00146604, 00146597, 00146543, 00143113, 00146634, 00146838, 00146700, 00147004, 00147166, 00147223, 00142775, 00142767). BRAZIL: Paraná, Curitiba, ponds near zoo, 7.ii.1990, sweep, S.A. Marshall (2♂ **). Distribution: Neotropical: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil. Etymology. The specific name means “two-forked” and references the forked tip of the right postgonite. Comments. Coproica bifurcata can be distinguished from its closest relative, C. hirtuloidea, by its slightly bifurcate and apically broad right postgonite (Fig. 45; narrow and sinuate apically in C. hirtuloidea: Fig. 170) in males and by the produced anterior margin of the female sternite 8 (Fig. 51). The postgonites and female sternite 8 are typically visible externally in well preserved or critical point dried specimens, nevertheless, dissections will often be required for the accurate identification of specimens from Bolivia and northern Argentina where the ranges of C. hirtuloidea and C. bifurcata overlap. Examination of the distiphallus will always provide a clear unambiguous determination. See also comments under C. hirtuloidea.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».