MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949542391 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14286023

Perilampus hyalinus Say 1829

2024· article· en· W6949542391 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Établissements canadiensRoyal Ontario Museum
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSulcusScapeSimple eye in invertebratesGroove (engineering)Apex (geometry)Oblique caseMedian plane

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

P. hyalinus species group sensu Smulyan (1936) and Darling (1996) Description. Female. Color: head and body entirely or at least partially brightly iridescent (Fig. 2 A, H). Head: in anterior view weakly transverse, slightly wider than high, HW / HH 1.2–1.3; slightly wider than pronotum, HW / PW 1.1–1.2. Frontal carina: distinct, extended from posterior margin of median ocellus (Fig. 2 B) to near lower eye margin (Fig. 2 A); in dorsal view narrow near median ocellus. Ocelli: median ocellus in line with lateral ocelli or only slightly advanced (Figs 2 B, 12 G). Eye: slightly shorter than head height, EH / HH 0.6–0.7. Vertex: rounded behind. Occiput: with vertical groove below vertex, with subparallel costulae; occipital carina absent. Malar space (Fig. 2 A): with oblique striae obliterating malar sulcus (Fig. 2 D). Clypeus (Fig. 3 A): weakly transverse to strongly transverse, CW / CH 1.3–1.6; lateral sulci straight or weakly curved, strongly divergent; with small and indistinct tentorial pits; epistomal sulcus concave, deeper and more distinct than lateral sulci; ventral margin concave or nearly flat. Supraclypeal area (Fig. 3 A): subquadrate; shorter and narrower than clypeus, SCH / CH 0.5–0.6. Scape (Figs 3 C – E): length about 0.6 × EH; narrow throughout; pits absent or if present distad covering no more than 0.2 × scape length (Figs 3 D, E). Flagellum (Fig. 3 I): anellus transverse, AL / PL about 0.3; Fu 1 subquadrate, Fu 1 L / Fu 1 W 1.0–1.1; subequal to or slightly longer in length than pedicel, Fu 1 L / PL 1.0–1.3; Fu 2 subquadrate or transverse, Fu 3 – Fu 7 transverse; clava 4 - segmented, C 1–3 as long dorsad as ventrad, with distinct terminal button (C 4). Mesosoma: slightly longer than wide, ML / MW 1.2–1.3. Pronotum: carinulate (Fig. 2 H); short, PN / MSC about 0.2; shorter along midline, 0.5–0.7 length laterad; anterior margin sharp, all rows of punctures on same plane. Lateral panel of pronotum: without flange (Fig. 4 D) or with flange below level of mesothoracic spiracle in posterior oblique view (Fig. 16 D: arrow); anterior margin sharp, all rows of punctures on same plane. Prepectus: wide and triangular; differentiated from pronotum with distinct suture; ventral strap short, without row of alveolae; central area of lateral panel smooth, with foveae along dorsal and posterior margins. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2 H): midlobe without tubercle; notaulus distinct and continuous, uninterrupted by sculpture of mesoscutum. Mesoscutellum: without tubercle; slightly longer than mesoscutum, SC / MSC 1.2–1.3; strongly vaulted, frenum ventrad and not visible in the dorsal view. Axilla: with axillar shelf (Fig. 2 F). Axillula: elongate and finger-like, AxL / AxH usually 2.0 or greater (Fig. 2 F). Metanotum: short, length 0.4–0.5 × length of propodeum along midline. Propodeum: width about 3 × length along midline; submedian area smooth to weakly imbricate, with foveae or groove laterad median carina, delimited laterad and ventrad by complete plicae, dorsad by transverse band of foveae; callus with angulate process below spiracle, and alveolate-rugose, with alveolae sometimes obliterated below spiracle; nucha with transverse to arcuate rugae. Fore wing: elongate, WL / WW 2.3–2.4; hyaline, with yellow or brown venation; parastigma swollen with weak equilateral triangular process; postmarginal vein 0.7–0.8 × as long as marginal vein; stigmal vein 0.3–0.4 × as long as marginal vein; stigma with weak uncus. Metasoma: petiole short and straplike, with weak transverse wrinkles; petiolar flange short with ventral margin of upper area with shallow emargination mesad; antecostal sulcus transverse, with weak vertical carinae laterad and smoothened mesad; Mt 2 with trapezoidal demarcation and shallow median groove, imbricate and wrinkled anteriad, and smooth posterad without lateral protruberances along midline, posterior margin straight and sparsely setose; Gt 3 smooth. Male. As in female, except: Color: mesonotum sometimes nearly entirely black or with cupreous iridescence (Fig. 3 L cf. Fig. 3 K). Eye: in dorsal view often more bulbous (Fig. 3 H cf. Fig. 3 G). Ocellus: often larger (Fig. 3 H cf. Fig. 3 G). Ocellar ratios LOD: POL: OOL: LOL: often shorter. Frontal carina: distance from lateral ocellus usually shorter. Malar space: MSL / EH often shorter. Flagellum: slightly wider (Fig. 3 J cf. Fig. 3 I). Scape (Fig. 3 F): in anterior view weakly expanded distad, 1.3–1.4 × width above radicle; with distinct pits on anterior surface (Fig. 3 F cf. Fig. 3 D, E); pitted surface not swollen in lateral view. Aedeagus: without a pair of lateral spines. Diagnosis. The P. hyalinus species group is characterized by: brightly iridescent coloration (Fig. 2 A, H), distinct frontal carina extended from posterior margin of median ocellus (Fig. 2 B cf. Fig. 2 C) to near lower eye margin (Fig. 2 A), oblique costae obliterating malar sulcus (Fig. 2 D cf. Fig. 2 E), carinulate pronotum (Fig. 2 H cf. Fig. 2 I), distinct and uninterrupted notaulus (Fig. 2 H), axilla with axillar shelf (Fig. 2 F cf. Fig. 2 G), and elongate and finger-like axillula (Fig. 2 F cf. Fig. 2 G). The P. platigaster species group has a similar structure of the frontal carina, axilla, and axillula, but is distinguished by having a malar sulcus (Fig. 2 E cf. Fig. 2 D) and the general body color black with or without weak iridescent reflections (Fig. 2 I cf. Fig. 2 H). Distribution. The P. hyalinus species group occurs exclusively in the Western Hemisphere, from the southern Canada to Argentina. Host association. The previously published host records indicate that species are mostly hyperparasitoids, parasitizing dipteran (Tachinidae and Sarcophagidae) and hymenopteran parasitoids (Ichneumonoidea) of Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, and rarely, Phasmatoidea and Coleoptera (e. g. Smith 1912; Smith 1958; Pitts et al. 2002; Janzen and Hallwachs 2009). Smith (1912) gave a detailed description of the biology of P. hyalinus Say as an indirect hyperparasitoid — the planidia actively searches and burrows into the host of the primary parasitoid (e. g. caterpillars), but can only feed and develop on the dipteran or hymenopteran parasitoids. There are relatively fewer cases of primary parasitoids in the P. hyalinus species group, and the best documented are the parasitoids of Neodiprion sawflies (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) (Tripp 1962). Remarks. This species group was hypothesized as a monophyletic group based on morphological characters (Darling 1996) and was well corroborated in our combined analysis of COI and ITS 2 (Fig. 1). The oblique costae obliterating the malar sulcus (Fig. 2 D) is the only shared and putatively derived character exclusive to this species group. Other character states (e. g. frontal carina) are widely distributed across Perilampidae in varying combinations, and a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of this family is required to understand their evolution. Yoo (2023) recognized two clades in the P. hyalinus species group supported by COI + ITS 2 and morphology: the P. carolinensis species complex, which has a parascrobal area abruptly narrowed in lateral view and the lateral panel of pronotum without a flange (Fig. 1 Clade II), and the P. hyalinus species complex which has a parascrobal area usually gradually narrowed in lateral view and the lateral panel of pronotum with or without a flange (Fig. 1 Clade III). The P. hyalinus species complex is further divided into three major clades which are congruent in genetic and morphological characters, for example the density of pits on the male scape, the shape of the lateral panel of the pronotum, and color of the mesonotum in females (Yoo 2023). The species in the P. hyalinus clade 3 (IIIc, Fig. 1), including P. arcus, P. seneca, and P. ute, are distinguished by a usually densely pitted male scape (Figs 17 G, 17 H, 19 H, 19 I, 21 G, 21 H) and the lateral panel of pronotum with a triangular flange (Figs 16 D, 18 D, 20 D). The species in the P. hyalinus clade 1 (IIIa, Fig. 1), including P. sonora, can be recognized by the cupreous mesonotum in females (Fig. 22 B), in addition to the usually sparse pits on the male scape (Fig. 23 G, H) and the lateral panel of the pronotum that lacks a triangular flange (Fig. 22 D). The P. hyalinus clade 2 species (IIIb, Fig. 1), including P. crassus, P. neodiprioni, P. hyalinus, P. monocteni, P. pilosus, and P. sirsiris, also has a sparsely pitted male scape (Figs 5 G, H, 7 F, G, 9 G, H, 11 G, H, 13 G, H, 15 F, G) and the lateral panel of pronotum without a triangular flange (Figs 4 D, 6 D, 8 D, 10 D, 12 D, 14 D). But the P. hyalinus clade 2 species do not have the strong cupreous mesonotum in females (e. g. Fig. 4 B), except in P. pilosus (Fig. 15 A).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,053

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,155 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→Travaux en français237 207→