Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The consequences of climate change are developing into a vast and unparalleled crisis, which is planetary in scale and yet very human in its causes and impacts. Faced with this truth, inaction and delay are neither ethical nor wise: every field of human activity, astronomy included, must take urgent steps to mitigate the crisis and avoid the worst potential outcomes, while adapting to those that are inevitable. We outline a strategy for climate-responsible scholarship and communication that we hope will resonate with the astronomical community's aspirations for a stable future in which there is room for curiosity and discovery.<br> <br> In light of the crisis, greenhouse gas emissions must be understood as significant research costs to be justified, budgeted, and rationed. Air travel is a major contributor. We must remove incentives in tenure and promotions for profligate travel, codify low-carbon practices, and reward efforts to minimize emissions while maximizing research. Any essential travel emissions must be fully offset, with carbon offsets that are reimbursable if not covered by the institution. <br> <br> The frequency, timing, and locations of conferences and colloquia should be planned to minimize air travel, with remote participation encouraged using online platforms. Conferences should favour lowest-impact food options by default, taking steps to minimize food waste (and other waste as well).<br> <br> Infrastructure must be planned with climate impacts in mind for both construction and operation. For buildings, this means pushing for designs and materials at the forefront of sustainable technology. For observatories and computing facilities, it includes justifying and thoroughly vetting the emissions footprint at the proposal stage and fully considering low-impact options, such as cloud computing.<br> <br> In education and outreach, we must strive to be reliable sources of scientific information on climate change, prepared to connect this to astrophysics and ready to direct curious people to authoritative sources.<br> <br> We recommended that CASCA support this transformation by establishing a sustainability committee (or office) to be tasked with conducting a community-wide survey of our greenhouse gas emissions and developing a decarbonization road map for the discipline. This committee would host sustainability forums and provide resources to support each of our other recommendations, especially climate-related materials and references for education and outreach.<br> <br> We recommend that CASCA push for climate-responsible governance. Governments, granting agencies, and universities must implement climate-responsible policies, like rationing the carbon budget of the entire discipline, using climate impacts to evaluate proposals, permitting the use of funds for offsets, and allowing climate-friendly but more costly travel options. Moreover, these entities must ultimately ration emissions to ensure that targets are met.<br> <br> To have an impact beyond the bounds of professional astronomy, we encourage astronomers to press their institutions to divest from fossil fuel extraction and its financing.<br> <br> Finally, we recommend that climate responsibility be an explicit priority in the 2020 Long Range Plan, and that it be used to guide all aspects of our profession, from our research and education practices to our infrastructure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».