MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949777931 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3705905

Psenulus Kohl 1897

2020· article· en· W6949777931 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenBankTexture (cosmology)Sequence (biology)BarcodeTable (database)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Psenulus sp. 1 female; La Sterpaia, Parco San Rossore (IT: Pisa); 31.05.2005 - 09.06.2005; L. Strumina leg.; S. F. Gayubo det.; DNA-ID; PSC-7; GenBank accession Nr. MG 872069. Discriminating morphological characters The main discriminating characters between female P. fulvicornis and P. schencki are depicted in Fig. 3. In brief, the lateral surface of the propodeum of P. fulvicornis has short crosswise carinas that give the texture the characteristic coarse appearance (Fig. 3A). This trait is unique among females of Central European Psenulus. In P. schencki crosswise carinas are lacking, and the texture of the propodeum is smoother (Fig. 3C). Moreover, the pygidal area is usually longer and broader in P. fulvicornis (Fig. 3B) than in P. schencki (Fig. 3D). Likewise, the colour of the foretibia tends to be lighter in P. fulvicornis than in P. schencki (Fig. 2). More characters and a description of males are given by Schmid-Egger (2002) and Jacobs (2007). cox1 sequence variation The cox1 sequences of P. fulvicornis and P. schencki from Zurich were sampled successfully and sequences were deposited in GenBank (supplementary Table S 1 in the Appendix). However, since the P. fulvicornis specimen from Geneva was collected several years ago, the extracted DNA was of poor quality and cox1 amplification failed in that sample, despite several amplification attempts with varying PCR parameters. All obtained sequences met barcode quality criteria with more than 500 bp sampled and no uncertain base calls (N’s). We found 22 polymorphic sites within a 561 bp alignment of the P. fulvicornis -Group, which excluded gap positions on the flanking regions (Table 1). All variable sites were synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), except two nonsynonymous replacements found in the specimens from Krasnodar (Russia) and Salamanca (Spain) (Fig. 4). The overall haplotype diversity was relatively high (Table 1). The three samples from the Caucasus (clades IV, V, and VI) strongly contributed to the overall genetic diversity as each sample represented a unique haplotype and contained a large proportion of polymorphic sites (Table 1; Fig. 4). cox1 phylogenetic tree In total, eleven cox1 sequences were sampled (supplementary Table S 1 in the Appendix). The dataset for the analysis of the genus Psenulus comprised 637 nucleotide sites and 42 sequences, including five sequences of two outgroup species, Diodontus minutus (Fabricius, 1793) and Pemphredon lethifer (Shuckard, 1837). Of the 637 sites, 204 were polymorphic. Both ML and Bayesian analyses resulted in highly similar topologies for Psenulus species (ML tree: Fig. 5; Bayesian tree: supplementary Fig. S 1 in the Appendix), and the genus obtained maximal support under both analyses. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were high for most taxa, but while Bayesian analysis highly supported a closer relationship between P. pallipes, P. trisulcus, P. meridionalis and P. fuscipennis, RAxML calculated only a low bootstrap value of 63% for this branching. Additionally, the position of the accession JN934379 within the P. pallipes clade was poorly supported in both analyses. The unidentified specimen PSC-7 from Pisa formed a highly supported sister branch to all other P. fulvicornis and P. schencki samples in both analyses (RAxML: 94%; MrBayes: 0.99), confirming the unknown status of PSC-7 whose species identification failed with 2.3% dissimilarity from other Psenulus species in a BOLD System search (http://www.boldsystems.org; July 10th, 2018). All samples of the P. fulvicornis -Group formed a highly supported monophyletic clade (RAxML: 81%; MrBayes: 0.99). The samples of the P. fulvicornis - Group were subdivided in six clades, all of which were congruent with taxonomic boundaries based on morphology (Fig. 5): On the one hand, P. fulvicornis was split in two well supported clades in Central and South- Western Europe, with clade I including the samples from Salamanca (RAxML: 88%; MrBayes: 0.99), and clade II including the samples from Zurich and Northern Spain (RAxML: 86%; MrBayes: 0.92). On the other hand, the seven P. schencki accessions from Canada, Germany and Zurich formed the well-supported monophyletic clade III (RAxML: 86%; MrBayes: 1.0). Finally, the three Caucasian specimens (one attributed morphologically to P. fulvicornis and the others to P. schencki) represented isolated branches (clades IV, V, and VI) whose relationships with one another and with Central European specimens remained unresolved. Position of segregation sites A G G T T G A A A T A A G T A A T A C T A G - - - - - - - - - C - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - A - - - C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A - - - - C - G - - - - A - T - - - - - - - A - - - - C - G - - - - A - T - - - II - - - - A - - - - C - G - C - - A - T - - - - - - C A - - - - - - - - - - - A - T - G T VI - - - - A - G - G - - - - - - - A - - C - - - - - - A - G - G - - - - - - - A - - C - - - - - - A - G - G - - - - - - - A - T C - - - - - - A - G - G - - - - - - - A - T C - - III - - - - A - G - G C - - - - - - A - - C - - - - - - A - G - G C - - - - - - A - - C - - - - - - A - G - G C - - - - - - A - - C - - - - - - A - G - G C - - - - - - A - - C - - - - A - A A - G - C G - A - - G A G T - - A IV T A - - A - - G - - G - - - T - A - T - - A V * * 12 12 45 45 108 108 111 111 117 144 144 168 168 * 178 178 192 192 213 213 243 243 270 270 285 285 321 321 330 330 456 456 * 472 472 474 474 486 486 496 496 516 516 543 543 Review of museum and private collections No P. fulvicornis were found among P. schencki accessions in Swiss museums and private collections. A total of 221 museum and eight specimens from private collections could be reviewed, of which 98% had an indication of the sampling site on the label (see Appendix). All major Swiss museum and private collections harbouring P. schencki could be visited apart from the Naturmuseum Luzern, which has three specimens that were not accessible for visitors in February 2018. The Bündner Naturmuseum, Muséum d’histoire naturelle Neuchâtel, Musée de la nature de Sion, Museo cantonale di storia naturale and Naturmuseum St. Gallen did not harbour P. schencki accessions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,088

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→Travaux en français237 207→