MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949904928 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6109503

Heteromeyenia Potts 1881

2015· article· en· W6949904928 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMarine Sponges and Natural Products
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpongeConical surfaceSkeleton (computer programming)Smooth surfaceDrainage network

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Genus Heteromeyenia Potts, 1881 Synonymy. For synonymy see Manconi & Pronzato (2002). Diagnosis. Spongillidae with encrusting body shape. Choanosomal skeleton an irregular network of paucispicular parallel fibres and undefined secondary tracts. Sparse spongin. Megascleres and microscleres acanthoxeas. Gemmules free in the sponge body. Foramen circular, tube short or long, with or without filiform extensions. Gemmular theca tri-layered with gemmuloscleres radially embedded. Gemmuloscleres in one or two categories: birotules and pseudobirotules (sensu Batista et al. 2007). Type Species: Spongilla baileyi Bowerbank, 1863 (by subsequent designation; De Laubenfels 1936). Heteromeyenia barlettai sp. nov. Type locality. Aquarium in São Paulo, São Paulo State, Paraná Basin, Brazil. Type specimens: Holotype. UFPEPOR 1728. Paratypes: UFPEPOR 1729 and UFPEPOR 1730 (collected together with the holotype). Diagnosis. Sponge encrusting to slightly massive, with megascleres and microscleres acanthoxeas; only one category of birotule gemmuloscleres, with exclusively smooth rotules, radially inserted in outer and pneumatic layers (theca) of the gemmule. Description of holotype. UFPEPOR 1728 is encrusting measuring 6 cm 2. Colour is creamy white in vivo, without colour change after preservation in ethanol. Megascleres acanthoxeas (250–280.3–310 / 8.8–9.9–12.5 µm), microscleres acanthoxeas (63–76.6–88 / 3.8–5.0–6.3 µm), gemmuloscleres birotules (58–61.1–68 / 5–5.6–7.5 / 17.5–18.0–20 µm), gemmules scattered throughout the sponge body (396–488–600 µm in diameter) (Table 1). Description. Sponges encrusting to slightly massive, 3–5 mm thick, 3 cm wide. Surface hispid with tubular and translucent oscules. Colour creamy white in vivo, without colour change after preservation in ethanol (Fig. 1). Consistency soft to fragile. Megascleres acanthoxeas (235–279.9–332 / 8.1–9.7–12.5 µm), slightly curved, with conical microspines scattered in the median portion (Fig. 2 a,b). Microscleres acanthoxeas (63–78.3–106 / 3.8–5.3– 6.4 µm), straight to curved, entirely spined with a variable number of spines, usually more abundant and larger in the median portion of the shaft. Spines can be straight or curved, curved ones are simple and occur mainly towards the center of the spicule; straight ones are simple (rarely) or compound (predominantly), occur in the center of the spicule. The compound spines have a bouquet-like structure, where the primary spine supports the secondary ones (Fig. 2 c,d). Gemmulosclere birotules (Fig. 2 e) (58–62.9–71 / 5.0–6.6–9.7 // 16–18.5–23 µm), radially inserted in the theca of gemmules; shaft with conical spines (simple or compound) (Fig. 2 f). Rotules are smooth, circular, convex and identical, with microspines on their margins, inserted perpendicularly, erect or recurved in either direction (Fig. 2 g). Gemmules (396–488–600 µm) rare, small, spherical, scattered throughout the sponge body (Fig. 3 a). Foramen short, with rosette-like collar from some gemmuloscleres radially inserted. Gemmular theca trilayered, well developed, with irregular spaces, gemmuloscleres radially inserted in the pneumatic layer, inner layer with compact spongin, outer layer irregularly outlined (Fig. 3 b,c). Species/ Specimens Locality Megasclere Microscleres Acanthoxea Acanthoxea Holotype (UFPEPOR 1728) SP, Brazil 250–280.3–310 / 63–76.6–88 / 8.8–9.9–12.5 3.8–5–6.3 Paratype (UFPEPOR 1729) SP, Brazil 245–280–332 / 64–76.9–87 / 8.1–9.6–11.3 4.8–5.3–6.4 Paratype (UFPEPOR 1730) SP, Brazil 235–279.3–319 / 64–81.3–106 / 8.1–9.5–9.7 4.8–5.7–6.4 continued. Species/ Gemmuloscleres Gemmules Specimens Birotulate Pseudobirotulate Holotype (UFPEPOR 1728) 58–61.1–68 / – 396–488–600 5–5.6–7.5 // 17.5–18–20 Paratype (UFPEPOR 1729) 58–64.6–71 / – – 6.4–7.5–9.7 // 16–18.9–23 Paratype (UFPEPOR 1730) – – – Ecology. According to the aquarium owner, Mr. Fernando Barletta, an ideal condition for the development of these sponges is a pH 7.5 or higher. But when the specimens are subjected to lower pH (acidic conditions), the sponges produce gemmules and die. The sponges prefer the lentic sites in the aquarium, and can be found at leaves and roots of aquatic plants, crevices of woods, and the plastic filter, but not on the stones. Etymology. The chosen specific name honors Fernando Barletta, the owner of the aquarium whose curiosity permitted the discovery of the new species. Remarks. Batista et al. (2007) redefined the genus to allocate Heteromeyenia cristalina, which has only one category of gemmulosclere, differing from all other congeners that have two categories. Thus, by sharing this character, H. cristalina is the species most similar to H. barlettai sp. nov. However, the new species differs from H. cristalina by its gemmuloscleres which have smooth rotules, in contrast to the rotules of H.cristalina that are entirely covered in microspines. Futhermore, there are differences in the pattern of spination of the shaft of gemmuloscleres. Heteromeyenia barlettai sp. nov. has spines that are predominantly compound, against predominantly simple spines observed on the shafts of gemmuloscleres of H. cristalina. Although Batista et al. (2007) did not describe compound spines, these can be observed in SEM images of gemmuloscleres (see Batista et al. 2007; Figs. 21–22). Another difference derives from the sizes of the spicules, as the megascleres, microscleres and gemmuloscleres of H. cristalina are larger than those of the new species (Table 1,2). . latitenta (Potts, 1881) (1) PensII˅anIª' USA 265–285 / 8–11 85 –100 / 2–3 50 –55 60–78 – . stepanowii (Dysbowsky, 1884) (1) Czechoslovakia, 180–310 / 8–11 78 –88 / 2–3 58 –65 75–88 430–520 Germany, Poland, Russia, China, Japan, New South Wales . tentasperma (Potts, 1880) (1) Wisconsin, USA 260–280 / 7–10 75 –80 / 2-3 50 –55 65–72 420–450 . tubisperma (Potts, 1881) (1) Canada 190–230 / 7–10 85 –90 / 2-3 40 –48 60–70 500–550 . barlettai sp. nov. (5) SP, Brazil 235–279.9–332 / 63–78.3–106 / 58–62.9–71 / – 396–488–600 8.1–9.7–12.5 3.8–5.3–6.4 5–6.6–9.7 // 16–18.5–23 REFERENCES: (1) Penney & Racek (1968); (2) Batista et al. (2007); (3) Kilian & Wintermann-Kilian (1976); (4) Weltner (1895); (5) current work. The natural environment of Heteromeyenia barlettai sp nov. is unknown. The macrophytes of the aquarium came from fish farm tanks near the Guarapiranga Reservoir, one of the main water sources for the city of São Paulo. The aquarium water was collected from the same reservoir. Probably, the gemmules were carried by the water or came attached to the macrophytes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,037

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsTravaux en français237 207