MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949910657 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7037013

Neocephalosphaera carinae Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6949910657 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueDiatoms and Algae Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaPedicelHolotypePhallus (fungus)Paratype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Neocephalosphaera carinae sp. nov. Figs 14–26, 129 Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂: COLOMBIA, Boyacá, SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Cab[aña] Mamarramos, 0525’N/7325’W, 2855 m [eters], 23.Sep[ix].–11.Oct[x].2000, 752 (1♂, IAvH) (photographed specimen). PARATYPE idem, 25.May[v].–08.Jun[vi].2000 (1♂, LEUA). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerin, both pinned along the specimen. Diagnosis. Trochanters light brown on the anterior face, dark brown posterodorsally; femora light brown with a dark brown spot on proximal third, dark brown dorsally. Tergites 2–5 velvety black anteriorly, brown pruinose posteriorly. Surstyli subsymmetrical, both with carinae on inner edges. Apex of phallic guide stout, long, with rigid and distinct submedian lobe dorsally, bearing a row of thin and clear apical setae ventrally and a hooked tip. Phallus with ejaculatory ducts completely spiralized. Description. MALE (holotype). Body length 4.6 mm. Head (Figs 14–15). Eyes contiguous for 21 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.5, 0.2. Frons brown pruinose. Postcranium brown, laterally and ventrally gray pruinose, dorsally brown pruinose. Antenna (Fig. 16) with scape and pedicel dark brown, pedicel with three setae dorsally and three longer setae ventrally; postpedicel light brown, with long acuminate apex. LPP/WPP = 3.3. Thorax (Figs 14–15, 17). Postpronotal lobe brown. Scutum black, brown pruinose. Notopleuron concolorous with the scutum, brown pruinose. Scutellum black, brown pruinose, with 14 conspicuous setae along posterior margin. Mesopleuron and mediotergite brown, gray-brown pruinose. Wing (Fig. 18). Length 5.7 mm. LW/MWW = 3.5; LTC/LFC = 0.6. Membrane faintly brown infuscated; third section costal shorter than the length of fourth; vein r-m located after the basal third of upper section of cell dm; vein M 2 short; dm-m/M 2 = 5.3; section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m; vein dm-m slightly curved. Halter dark brown except stem beige. Legs (Figs 14–15). Coxae dark brown; trochanters light brown on the anterior face, dark brown posterodorsally; femora light brown with a dark brown spot on proximal third, dark brown dorsally, with a row of long and fine yellow setae posterolaterally; tibiae dark yellow, hind tibia with brown spots and posterior erect setae medially; tarsomeres 1–4 yellow, 5 brown; pulvilli yellow. Abdomen (Figs 14–15, 19). Ground color dark, tergite 1 sparsely gray-brown pruinose, with seven stout black setae laterally; tergites 2–5 velvety black anteriorly, brown pruinose posteriorly; tergites 1–3 gray pruinose laterally; tergites 4–5 brown pruinose laterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 20. Syntergosternite 8 brown, brown pruinose, shorter than tergite 5 length, with membranous area large, dividing the syntergosternite 8 ventrally and reaching epandrium (Figs 19, 21). Terminalia (Figs 20–26). Epandrium and surstyli dark brown (Figs 21–22). Surstyli (Figs 21–24) subsymmetrical, shorter than the length of epandrium, completely setose; both surstyli with carinae on apical inner edges (Fig. 22); left surstylus slightly shorter and thinner than right, both surstyli with tips downward directed when seen in lateral view (Figs 23–24). Apex of phallic guide stout, long, with rigid and distinct submedian lobe dorsally; bearing a row of thin clear setae ventrally and hooked tip (Fig. 25). Ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, with one margin somewhat straight (Fig. 26). Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts completely spiralized (Fig. 25). FEMALE. Unknown. Geographical distribution. Colombia (Boyacá) (Fig. 129). Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the type locality, Boyacá, Colombia. Habitat. The specimens were collected with Malaise traps at ground level. The vegetation of the collection site is composed of cloud Andean forests of the Eastern Cordillera of Northeastern region of Colombia. Taxonomic notes. Neocephalosphaera carinae sp. nov. runs to N. jamaicensis Johnson, 1919 in the couplet 18 of the key presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009). It differs from N. jamaicensis in having the antenna with postpedicel long, with acuminate apex (Fig. 16) [versus antenna with postpedicel short, with the acuminate apex in N. jamaicensis, figure 42.6, presented by Rafael (1992)]; femora light brown with a dark brown spot on proximal third, dark brown dorsally (Figs 14–15) (versus femora dark brown to black, with bases and apices yellow); trochanters light brown on the anterior face, dark brown posterodorsally (Fig. 14) (versus trochanters yellow); apex of phallic guide with rigid and distinct submedian lobe dorsally and hooked tip (Fig. 25) [versus apex of phallic guide with straight margins dorsally and ventrally and straight tip, figure 3.I, presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009)]; phallus with ejaculatory ducts completely spiralized (Fig. 25) [versus phallus with ejaculatory ducts spiralized only in distal 3/4, figure 3.I, presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009)]. Based on the male specimen and due to the shape of the surstyli, N. carinae sp. nov. is also related to N. iguaquensis sp. nov. (Figs 50–51), N. muisca sp. nov. (Figs 66–67), and N. spiralis sp. nov. (Figs 105–106). It differs from N. iguaquensis sp. nov. in having apex of phallic guide with rigid and distinct submedian lobe dorsally and hooked tip (Fig. 25) [versus apex of phallic guide with distinct submedian truncated lobe ventrally, slightly straight dorsally, tip slightly downward directed with a small translucent lobe dorsally in N. iguaquensis sp. nov. (Fig. 54)]; phallus with ejaculatory ducts completely spiralized (Fig. 25) [versus phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts spiralized, only in distal 3/4 (Fig. 54)]; ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, with one margin somewhat straight (Fig. 26) [versus ejaculatory apodeme somewhat nail-shaped (Fig. 55)]. It differs from N. muisca sp. nov. in having syntergosternite 8 shorter than tergite 5 length, without crestlike membranous area (Figs 19, 21) [versus syntergosternite 8 larger than tergite 5, with crestlike membranous area in N. muisca sp. nov. (Figs 64, 66)]; phallus with ejaculatory ducts completely spiralized (Fig. 25) [versus phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts spiralized, only in distal 3/4 (Fig. 70)]. It differs from N. spiralis sp. nov. in having section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m (Fig. 18) [versus section between cell dm and vein M 2 equal than vein dm-m in N. spiralis sp. nov. (Fig. 102)]; apex of phallic guide with rigid and distinct submedian lobe dorsally and hooked tip (Fig. 25) [versus apex of phallic guide with distinct submedian acute lobe ventrally, which is downward directed; tip slightly downward directed (Fig. 109)]; ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, with one margin somewhat straight (Fig. 26) [versus ejaculatory apodeme somewhat funnel-shaped narrowed, slightly inclined (Fig. 110)].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,064

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetDiatoms and Algae Research→Travaux en français237 207→