Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Genus Themisto Guérin 1825 Remarks This genus has provided much taxonomic confusion in the past. Its status has been in question being known alternately as Euthemisto or Parathemisto, sometimes with subgenera. Bowman et al. (1982) restored the genus Themisto, which up until that time was considered a junior homonym of the nudibranch Themisto Oken, 1815; a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes by the ICZN (1956). The uncertainty of the generic status combined with several illdefined species, subspecies and varieties has made specific determination very difficult, despite the efforts of Bowman (1960), Sheader and Evans (1974) and Schneppenheim and WeigmannHaass (1986). Vinogradov et al. (1982) recognise six species, but Schneppenheim and WeigmannHaass (1986) demonstrated that northern hemisphere material, previously identified with T. gaudichaudii Guérin, 1825, is a separate species, T. compressa Goës, 1865. In view of the past confusion, and recent studies by Schneppenheim and WeigmannHaass (1986), a new key to species is provided to assist future workers. The holotype of T. gaudichaudii was discovered recently in the GuérinMéneville collection (No. 438), in the ANSP (Zeidler 1997). The correct citation for the original description of this species has been confused in the past with some authors citing Guérin, 1828 (eg. Schneppenheim & WeigmannHaass 1986; Spamer & Bogan 1992, 1994). This has arisen because, although the genus and species was first described in 1825, Guérin (1828) more or less repeated his description in a separate memoir introducing them as new, and providing figures of the type. All species of Themisto are mainly freeswimming, and can occur in large numbers, particularly in colder waters where, like krill, they play a significant role as food for planktonfeeding predators. Although considered mainly freeliving, species of Themisto are known to be associated with medusae and salps (Madin & Harbison 1977; Laval 1980), and specimens of T. australis have been collected from Salpa fusiformis from Tasmanian waters. Additional biological and ecological information is given by the following; Bary (1959), Kane (1963), Siegfried (1965), Gray (1967), Evans (1968), Semenova (1974), Sheader (1975, 1977, 1981, 1990), Sheader and Evans (1975), Williams and Robins (1981), Bowman et al. (1982), Hiroki (1988), Corey (1990), Semura et al. (1991), Percy (1993), Colombo and Vinas (1994), Koszteyn et al. (1995), Condon and Norman (1999) and Vinogradov (1999b). Themisto has a bipolar distribution with species restricted to the colder waters of the Arctic and Antarctic regions and occasionally venturing into cooltemperature waters. Species: as in the following key. Key to the species of the genus Themisto 1. Pereopod 5 not longer than P6 or P7 ........................................................................... 2 Pereopod 5 much longer than P6 or P7 ........................................................................ 5 2. Maxilliped without row of setae on distal margin of basal plate (arctic and subarctic of Atlantic) ............................................................................. T. abyssorum (Boeck, 1871) Maxilliped with row of setae on distal margin of basal plate ..................................... 3 3. Pereopods 5 & 6; dactylus smooth. Antenna 1 of female hooked, stout (colder waters of Australia and New Zealand) T. australis (Stebbing, 1888) Pereopods 5 & 6; dactylus with setae at base. Antennae 1 of female straight, tapering (North Pacific) ............................................................................................................. 4 4. Antennae 2 of females longer than A1. Adult females reach 9–17 mm in length. Pereopod 3 with 6–8 (usually 7) robust setae on posterior margin of carpus ...................... .......................................................................................... T. japonica (Bovallius, 1887) Antennae 2 of females equal in length to A1. Adult females reach 5–9 mm in length. Pereopod 3 with 3–5 (usually 4) robust setae on posterior margin of carpus ................ ........................................................................................... T. pacifica (Stebbing, 1888) 5. Pereopod 7 usually longer than P6, but shorter than P5. Gnathopod 2; merus with relatively straight distal margin,anterodistal corner produced into small tooth(North Atlantic) ................................................................................................. T. compressa Goës, 1865 Pereopod 6 & 7 subequal in length. Gnathopod 2; merus with rounded distal margin 6 6. Pereopods 3–7; dactylus with setae on basal part (arctic and subarctic) ........................ ....................................................................... T. libellula (Lichtenstein in Mandt, 1822) Pereopods 3–7; dactylus smooth (colder waters of southern oceans) ............................. ......................................................................................... T. gaudichaudii Guérin, 1825
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».