MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949996606 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337903

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) miltolepoides Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6949996606 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSimple eye in invertebratesSternaHalictidaePsylloideaHemiptera

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) miltolepoides sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 93B5EE64-174D-455C-B8C2-10F6BA154B6A Figs 61–63, 90I, 97B, 103B, 113A Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum miltolepoides sp. nov. can be recognized by the acarinarial fan absent, T1 anterior surface with sparse erect hairs, mesepisternum rugulose, metasoma partially or entirely reddish brown, and ocelli normal. They are most similar to Lasioglossum microlepoides (Ellis, 1914) and L. eophilus. Females of L. microlepoides have the metasoma metallic green, scutum with stronger dull microsculpture, and metasomal terga with less extensive tomentum. Females of L. eophilus have the ocelli enlarged (separated by about 0.5 OD), mesepisternum strongly rugose, acarinarial fan sparse but present, and metasomal terga with more extensive tomentum. Males of L. miltolepoides sp. nov. can be recognized by the clypeus shiny and sparsely punctate (i =1–4 pd) and without a non-metallic apical band, face entirely lacking tomentum, mesepisternum often dull or rugulose, T1 anterior surface with abundant erect hair and sparse appressed hair, metasomal sterna with relatively short hair (1–1.5 OD), and metasoma mostly dark. They are most similar to L. microlepoides, L. rufornatum sp. nov., and L. minckleyi sp. nov. Males of L. microlepoides have the metasoma metallic green. Males of L. rufornatum sp. nov. have the metasomal sterna with long hair (2–4 OD), face and metasomal terga with dense tomentum, T1 anterior surface with erect hair limited to lateral margins, and metasomal terga metallic at least in part. Males of L. minckleyi sp. nov. have the face below eye emargination covered in dense tomentum, clypeus apical margin reddish brown to orange and not metallic, and T1 anterior surface with erect hair limited to lateral margins. Etymology The specific epithet miltolepoides is formed from the Greek adjective ‘ miltos ’ (‘red earth’), the noun ‘ lepas ’ (‘rock’), and the suffix ‘- oides ’ (indicating resemblance). The first part of the name is a reference to the earthy-red colour of the metasoma and the rocks typical of this species’ habitat. The latter part of the name is a reference to the very similar species, Lasioglossum microlepoides (Ellis, 1914), of unknown etymology but probably similar to that given here. An appropriate translation would be the red rock sweat bee. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Utah • ♀; Kane Co., Tibbet Canyon, nr JCS; 37.1606° N, 111.5392° W; 26 Jun. 2002; J. Wilson leg.; ex Tamarix sp.; PCYU. [Verbatim label: USA UT Kane Co. / Tibbet Cyn 12S E452127 N4112825 nr JCS // Tamarix sp. // 26 June 2002 / J. Wilson // 2374A09 // NativeBeeSurvey / USA,Logan, Utah / BBSL439722 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) miltolepoides Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes UNITED STATES – Arizona • 1 ♀; Grand Canyon Mile 0; [36° N, 112° W]; 5 Jun. 1953; G.D. Butler leg.; UAIC • 2 ♀♀; Grand Canyon Mile 20.4; [36° N, 112° W]; 6 Jun. 1953; G.D. Butler leg.; UAIC. – California • 1 ♀; Inyo Co., 5 mi. W of Big Pine; [37.16° N, 118.38° W]; 15 Jun. 1999; J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♂; San Bernardino Co., Helendale; [34.74° N, 117.33° W]; 24 Oct. 1967; J.C. Hall leg.; ex Chrysothamnus; UCRC • 1 ♀; Twentynine Palms; [34.14° N, 116.05° W]; 4 Aug. 1933; Timberlake leg.; ex Wislizenia refracta; UCRC • 1 ♂; Victorville; [34.54° N, 117.29° W]; 28 Sep. 1938; Timberlake leg.; ex Baccharis salicina; UCRC. – Nevada • 4 ♀♀; Clark Co., Lee Canyon; 36.4476° N, 115.5097° W; 1252 m a.s.l.; 7 Sep. 2004; S. Higbee and T. Griswold leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; 4 mi. E of Glendale; [36.66° N, 114.49° W]; 20 Jun. 1939; Timberlake leg.; ex Baileya pauciradiata; UCRC. – Utah • 1 ♀; Grand Co., 8 mi. SE of Emery; [38.84° N, 111.14° W]; 19 May 1980; D.B. Wahl leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Kane Co., Tibbet Canyon, nr JCS; 37.1606° N, 111.5392° W; 26 Jun. 2002; S. Higbee leg.; ex Tamarix sp.; BBSL • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; PCYU • 2 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂; San Juan Co., 10 mi. NNW of Mexican Hat, Moki Dugway, nr base; 37.27817° N, 109.94357° W; 1637 m a.s.l.; 20 Jun. 2000; A L. Hicks and V.L. Scott leg.; ex Stanleya sp.; UCMC • 11 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂; San Juan Co., 10 mi. NNW of Mexican Hat, Moki Dugway near base; 37.2781° N, 109.94357° W; 1637 m a.s.l.; 20 Jun. 2000; A.L. Hicks and Virginia Scott leg.; ex Stanleya; UCMC • 1 ♀; San Juan Co., Moki Dugway, ca 10 mi. NNW of Mexican Hat; 37.27817° N, 109.94357° W; 1637 m a.s.l.; 20 Jun. 2000; A.L. Hicks and V.L. Scott leg.; ex Stanleya sp.; WRME • 1 ♀; Wayne Co., 2 mi. W of Caineville; [38.33° N, 111.06° W]; 28 Jun. 1999; L. Packer leg.; PCYU. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour black to reddish brown; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible orange with black basal spot or band and red tip; flagellum reddish brown dorsally, reddish brown to orange ventrally; pronotal lobe black to reddish brown; metasoma orange to black with rims of terga and sterna broadly translucent yellow, dark spiracular spots on T2–4; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, base and apex of tibiae, and tarsi orange; tegula orange to brown; wing membrane hyaline or lightly infuscated, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise pale amber to brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour pale yellow to white. Tomentum dense on gena, pronotal collar and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, metanotum medially, T2–3 basolaterally, and T4 throughout; sparse on paraocular area. Scutum hair thin to moderately plumose. Wing hairs dark or light, short and dense. Acarinarial fan absent. T2 fringes sparse, T3 fringes sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures sparse (i= 1–3 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes becoming tessellate basally; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i =1–3 pd), sculpture tessellate, usually becoming shiny medially; paraocular area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture tessellate to imbricate around antenna socket, otherwise shiny; frons punctures crowded (i=0 pd), often indistinct, sculpture areolaterugulose, sometimes becoming smooth and shiny dorsally; vertex punctures dense to moderately sparse laterally (i <2 pd), often indistinct, fine and sparse medially (i=1–4 pd), sculpture shiny, usually imbricate to rugulose laterally; gena punctures moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes becoming weakly rugulose posteriorly and ventrally; postgena sculpture shiny, becoming tessellate to imbricate posteriorly; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), becoming moderately sparse submedially and anteromedially (i =1–3 pd), sculpture tessellate, sometimes becoming shiny posterolaterally; scutellum punctures dense marginally and on median line (i <1 pd), moderately sparse submedially (i =1–2 pd), diversopunctate, sculpture shiny to imbricate; metanotum sculpture imbricate to weakly rugulose, becoming finely, densely punctate and sometimes shiny medially; metapostnotum rugae strong or weak, anastomosing to subparallel, reaching or nearly reaching margin, sculpture imbricate to weakly tessellate; preëpisternum sculpture imbricate to rugulose; hypoepimeron punctures crowded (i=0 pd), indistinct, sculpture imbricate to rugulose; mesepisternum punctures moderately sparse (i= 1–2 pd), indistinct, sculpture imbricate to rugulose; metepisternum sculpture ruguloso-lineate dorsally, imbricate ventrally; propodeum lateral face sculpture tessellate; propodeum posterior face sculpture tessellate; T1 anterior face sculpture shiny; T1 dorsal surface punctures fine, sparse (i= 1–4 pd), absent or very sparse in large apicolateral oval patches, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures moderately dense (i= 1–3 pd), disc sculpture shiny, rim punctures moderately dense (i =1–3 pd), rim sculpture shiny. S TRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.85 (± 0.01 SD). Clypeus projecting ~67% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.44 (± 0.03 SD); apicolateral denticles low rounded knobs; supraclypeal area length/width ratio 0.86 (± 0.09 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle obtuse; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 0.96 (± 0.06 SD) mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.76 (± 0.04 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 2.89 (± 0.1 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.58 (± 0.13 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.64 (± 0.04 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina absent. T2 depressed apical rim length less than 50% of segment. (n =10) Male COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue to olive green; clypeus apical colour concolourous with base; labrum black, reddish brown, to orange; mandible orange with black basal band and red tip; flagellum reddish brown dorsally, red to orange ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown; metasoma black to reddish brown with rims of terga and sterna and downcurved lateral areas of terga becoming orange to translucent yellow; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, base and apex of tibiae, and tarsi orange; tegula orange; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise brown to light brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white. Tomentum sparse on gena, pronotal angle and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, and T2–4 basolaterally. Scutum hair densely plumose. Sterna hair short (1–1.5 OD), moderately plumose, sparse and erect. Wing hairs dark or light, long and sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures sparse (i= 1–4 pd), sculpture shiny; supraclypeal area punctures moderately sparse (i= 1–2 pd), sculpture shiny to imbricate; paraocular area punctures moderately dense (i =1–2 pd), sculpture imbricate around antenna socket, otherwise shiny; frons punctures crowded (i =0 pd), sculpture shiny to imbricate, becoming rugulose above antenna; vertex punctures dense laterally (i ≤ 1 pd), slightly sparser medially (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes imbricate laterally; gena punctures sparse (i= 1–3 pd), sculpture shiny, becoming imbricate and weakly ruguloso-lineate posteriorly and ventrally; postgena sculpture i

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,174 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207