Microlia amici Bortoluzzi & Caron, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Microlia amici Bortoluzzi & Caron, sp. nov. (Figures 1–16) Material examined. Holotype. Male deposited in DZUP, labels: (1) “ BRASIL, PR[Paraná], Balsa Nova,/Rio dos Papagaios 23-II- /2008 (manual)/P.C. Grossi col./Em flor de Asteraceae ” [white label, printed in black]; (2) “ Holotype / Microlia amici / Bortoluzzi & Caron, 2015” [red label, printed in black]. 11 Paratypes. Two males, deposited in DZUP, dissected and mounted on plastic slide imbedded in Canada Balsam; labels (1) “♂” [white label, printed in black]; (2) “ BRASIL, PR[Paraná], Balsa Nova,/Rio dos Papagaios 23-II- /2008 (manual)/P.C. Grossi col./Em flor de Asteraceae ” [white label, printed in black]. Four females, deposited in DZUP, dissected and mounted on plastic slide imbedded in Canada Balsam; labels (1) “♂” [white label, printed in black]; (2) “ BRASIL, PR[Paraná], Balsa Nova,/Rio dos Papagaios 23-II- /2008 (manual)/P.C. Grossi col./Em flor de Asteraceae ” [white label, printed in black]. Five males, three deposited in DZUP and two in FMNH, and two females, deposited in FMNH, with the same labels as paratypes. Additional material. 73 specimens deposited in DZUP, sex undetermined, all with the same first label as holotype. Diagnosis. Microlia amici sp. nov. differs from M. meticola by abdominal segments darker, mesotarsus with 5 segments, tergum VII of male without tubercles, tergum VIII of male emarginated in posterior margin. In addition M. amici sp. nov. differs from other species of Microlia by the shape of median lobe, mainly the apical process (Figs 12 – 13) and spermatheca forming a sinuously in shape, with female accessory sclerite (Fig. 16). Decription. Male. Maximum body length: 1.5 mm; maximum elytra width: 0.5 mm. Body broad; head, elytra and abdomen somewhat red-brown to dark-brown, always abdomen darker; pronotum and appendices uniformly light-brown, except antennal apex with articles 7 – 11 or 8 – 11 darker. Dorsal surface glossy; setigerous pores sparse and more densely on pronotum and elytra; pronotum with pubescence directed posteriorly in midline and lateroposteriad in lateral areas; elytra and abdomen with pubescence straight and direct posteriad. Head as long as wide; eyes 2 times as long as temples; infraorbital carina complete. Antennal articles 1 and 2 subequal in length; 2 slightly longer than 3; articles 4 – 5 subquadrate, articles 6 – 10 transverse and gradually increasing in width toward antennal apex; article 10 twice as wide as long; article 11 as long as article 9 – 10 combined; with two coeloconic sensilla. Labrum transverse, anterior margin with four shallow emarginations (Fig. 3). Mandibles broad and curved at apex (Fig. 4); right mandible with small medial tooth, directed anteriorly; Maxilla with galea extending slightly beyond apex of lacinia, galea narrower than lacinia (Fig. 5); apical lobe of galea covered with innumerable fine and short setae; apical half of lacinia with row of spaced spines, and basal half covered with numerous long setae; maxillary palpus with 4 articles and pseudoarticle, 2nd slightly shorter than 3rd and 4th about half length of preceeding. Labium with ligula split into two lobes (Fig. 6 a); labial palpus with 3 articles and pseudoarticle. Hypopharyngeal lobes well developed (Fig. 6 b). Mentum with protruding anterior angles; gular plate broad. Elytra slightly broader than pronotum; posterior outer corners slightly emarginated. Hind wings fully developed. Mesoventrite process about half length of mesocoxae, acute and rounded at apex, mesocoxae slightly separated, mesocoxal cavities margined posteriorly (Fig. 7); metaventrite process almost not existent; isthmus about 2/3 as long as mesoventrite process. Tarsal formula 4 – 5 – 5; tarsomere 5 the longest, as long as 3 and 4 combined. Abdomen gradually narrowing apically; first three visible terga deeply impressed basally; tergum III at posterior margin without projection (Fig. 8); tergum VII the longest, devoid of projection (Fig. 9); tergum VIII with small tubercles on front of posterior margin and posterior margin emarginated (Fig. 10); sternum VIII with posterior margin projected on median as pointed triangular lobe, pointed at the apex, and series of bifurcate setae (Fig. 11); tergum IX separated by tergum X and with symmetrical ventral struts; sternum IX three times as long as wide and two conspicuous short setae at apex; tergum X slightly emarginated at apex, with four long setae on each side and very weakly pigmented on median of posterior margin. Median lobe of aedeagus as Figs. 12 – 13. Female. Similar to male, except tergum VIII without small tubercles in front of posterior margin and almost truncate at posterior margin (Fig. 14); sternum VIII with slightly posterior margin projected medially, not forming as pointed triangular lobe as male; without bifurcate setae (Fig. 15); tergum IX without ventral struts; sternum IX as ovipositor consisting of pair of ventral sclerites, each 3 times as long as wide; tergum X with three long setae each side; spermatheca forming a sinuously in shape, with accessory sclerite near at base of subspherical capsule (Fig. 16). Distribution. Southern Brazil (Paraná: Balsa Nova, Rio dos Papagaios). Biological notes. The specimens were collected in Asteraceae flowers. Etymology. The specific name “ amici ” is a Latin masculine noun in genitive, that mean “friend” and it is an allusion to the dear friend and entomologist Paschoal Coelho Grossi that collected the holotype.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,019 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».