MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950155407 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7103628

Chimerothalassius sinclairi Brooks & Cumming 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6950155407 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeSetaOmmatidiumDorsumThorax (insect anatomy)Genus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chimerothalassius sinclairi sp. nov. (Figs 8–10, 26–33) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 4402E850-080F-4802-8725-15A2D694503E Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂ labelled: “ NEW CALEDONIA: Parc / Rivève [sic] Bleue; R. Bleue / nr. refuge [ca 22°05ʹ50ʺS 166°38ʹ17ʺE], 20–21.vii./ 1995; B.J. Sinclair / ex. yellow pans”; “ CNC/ 1155798 ”; “ HOLOTYPE / Chimerothalassius sinclairi / Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (MNHN). Diagnosis. Known only from a single male, C. sinclairi sp. nov. is distinguished from the other known Australasian species of the genus by its white capitate palpus (Figs 27, 28), and several hypopygial features (Figs 29–33) including: left ventral epandrial process with narrowed beak-like tip; left ventral surstylus short with short seta; right epandrial lamella with large elongate seta on posterior margin; right ventral epandrial process sinuous; phallus sinuous and narrow; cercus with long setae; hypoproct simple and broad. Description. Male (Figs 26–33): Body length 1.20 mm, wing length approximately 1 mm. Head (Figs 27, 28): Silvery grey pruinose with bluish reflections; broader than thorax in dorsal view; round in lateral view (about as broad as high); broader than high in anterior view; larger setae black. Ocellar triangle conspicuous. Occiput weakly concave on upper median part. Eyes covered with short ommatrichia; medial edge of eye with distinct emargination adjacent to antenna; ommatidia progressively smaller anterodorsally. Frons 3X broader than high, widening above. Face narrow, with eyes nearly contiguous. Face and clypeus concolorous with rest of head. Clypeus not separated from face, small and triangular, not produced. Setae of head well differentiated: 1 pair of weakly reclinate frontoorbitals close to base of antennae; 1 pair of small anterior ocellars; 1 pair of small posterior ocellars; 1 pair of inclinate inner verticals (sometimes referred to as postocellars); 2 pairs of lateroclinate outer verticals; postoculars short fine and pale, upper few setae uniserial, lower setae scattered and longer around oral cavity. Antenna entirely pale brown, inserted slightly above middle of head in profile; scape short, funnel-shaped; pedicel slightly longer than scape, spheroidal with subapical circlet of setulae; postpedicel 2.7X longer than wide, bulb-shaped with basal 1/3 round and distal 2/3 narrow, clothed in fine setulae, longer on narrow distal part; arista-like stylus 1.6X length of postpedicel, with minute hairs. Palpus bright white, narrow basally, abruptly capitate apically. Proboscis pale brown, short. Gena narrow. Thorax: Brown with light silver-grey pruinosity, with green and bronze reflections especially dorsally, setae black. Mesoscutum weakly arched, prescutellar depression present. Proepisternum with tiny upper and tiny lower seta. Postpronotal lobe with 1 minute seta. Mesonotum longer than wide. Acrostichal setae short, uniserial and irregular; other thoracic setae mostly short and weak, each side of mesonotum with: approximately 7 dorsocentrals (anterior setae similar to acrostichals, posterior seta stronger), apparently 2 short presutural supra-alars (posthumerals), postsutural supra-alar broken or absent, 2 strong notopleurals, postalar apparently broken. Scutellum broadly subtriangular with 1 long, strong, dorsally projected seta per side. Mesopleuron bare. Halter whitish. Legs (Fig. 26): Mostly pale brown except, fore coxa pale yellow, femora partially to mostly pale yellow ventrally; with mostly short pale setae; tarsomeres 1–4 of all legs progressively shorter apically with tarsomere 5 slightly longer than 4; tarsomere 5 of all legs with dorsomedial finger-like process; tarsal claws small, pulvilli and empodium normally developed on all legs. Foreleg: Coxa with fine setae on anterior surface, several basal setae longer, apical margin with setae longer; femur slightly longer than tibia and somewhat enlarged, with series of several small erect setae basally and series of stronger posteroventral setae along distal half; tarsus subequal in length to tibia; tarsomere 1 subequal to combined length of tarsomeres 2–4. Midleg: Coxa obscured from view; femur, tibia and tarsus subequal in length; tarsomere 1 subequal to combined length of tarsomeres 2–4. Hindleg: Coxa with 1 visible pale seta on lateral surface; femur slightly longer than tibia; tarsus subequal in length to tibia; tarsomere 1 subequal to combined length of tarsomeres 2–3. Wing (Fig. 26): Similar to C. riparius sp. nov. (see Fig. 22), except as follows: Extreme anterior base of costa bare. Base of wing proximal to tip of cell cua quite narrow. Calypter without setae. Abdomen (Figs 29, 30): Pale brown with small brownish setae (weaker on sternites); sternite 6 and segment 7 bare. Segments 5–7 narrowed and laterally compressed to form cavity on right side for hypopygium. Sternite 5 lacking pregenitalic process. Sternite 8 ovoid, with short setae; tergite 8 indistinct. Hypopygium (Figs 29–33): Concolorous with pregenitalic abdominal sclerites; lateroflexed to right; inverted with posterior end directed anteriorly; small and compact, about 1/4 length of abdomen; asymmetrical; foramen not formed. Epandrium divided into left and right lamellae. Left epandrial lamella (Fig. 31) largely overlapping left side of hypandrium, with broadly projecting and rounded anterior margin, posterior margin trifurcate, ventrally fused with hypandrium but margin distinct; ventral epandrial process apparently not articulated at base, long and slender, bent ventrally, with narrowed beak-like tip. Left surstylus bilobed, dorsal and ventral lobes separated by shallow U-shaped cleft through which left postgonite lobe protrudes. Dorsal lobe of left surstylus broadened mid-ventrally with short apical seta, long preapical dorsal seta and short dorsal seta, lacking prensiseta. Ventral lobe of left surstylus short with short preapical seta. Right epandrial lamella (Fig. 32) elongate and subtriangular, partially overlapping right side of hypandrium, ventrally fused with hypandrium but margin distinct, longer than hypandrium, with large elongate seta near middle of posterior margin; ventral epandrial process present, sinuous and projecting dorsally, hidden behind right epandrial lamella. Right surstylus bilobed, dorsal and ventral lobes separated by U-shaped cleft through which right postgonite lobe protrudes. Dorsal lobe of right surstylus short with short apical seta, long preapical dorsal seta and short dorsal seta, lacking prensiseta. Ventral lobe of right surstylus elongate and broadly bifurcate apically, with 1 ventral seta near middle and 1 small medial seta near bifurcation. Hypandrium relatively small and narrowing anteriorly, shorter than epandrium in lateral view. Left postgonite lobe large and long, broad basally, gradually tapered to narrow apex (Fig. 31). Right postgonite lobe shorter than left lobe, with broad rounded apex (Fig. 32). Phallus tubular, sinuous and narrow, bent upwards. Ejaculatory apodeme apparently keel-like. Hypoproct simple and broad in dorsal view (Fig. 33) left and right sides symmetrical. Cercus subrectangular in dorsal view (Fig. 33), with 3 long setae, left and right cercus symmetrical. Female. Unknown. Distribution. This new species is known only from the type locality along Rivère Bleue in the Yaté Commune of the South Province of New Caledonia (Figs 8–10). Etymology. This species is named in honour of our colleague, Dr. Bradley J. Sinclair who collected the unique holotype along the margin of Rivère Bleue (Figs 9, 10) using yellow pan traps. Brad’s collecting efforts in Australia and New Caledonia also produced the only known specimens of Chimerothalassius riparius sp. nov. and Microphorella viticula sp. nov. Remarks. The holotype of C. sinclairi sp. nov. was collected together with the type series of C. riparius sp. nov. in yellow pan traps placed along the margin of Rivère Bleue.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,073

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyTravaux en français237 207