MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950175705 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5098963

Alaptus klonx Triapitsyn, sp. n.

2017· article· en· W6950175705 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeScapePedicelQuadrate boneAntenna (radio)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Alaptus klonx Triapitsyn, sp. n. (Figs 74–81) Type material. Holotype female [UCRC] on slide (Fig. 76) labeled: 1. “USA, Florida, Jefferson Co., Monticello, University of Florida North Florida Research & Educa-tion Center, 315. viii.2002, R. Mizell, III, MT at forest edge”; 2. “ Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2015 in Canada balsam ”; 3. [magenta] “ Alaptus klonx Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ♀ ”; 4. “ Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2015 ”; 5. [database label] “ Univ. Calif. Riverside Ent. Res. Museum UCRC ENT 382897 ”. The Malaise trap that captured the holotype had been installed by S.V. Triapitsyn and V.V. Berezovskiy in the former University of Florida North Florida Research & Education Center in Monticello, Florida, and then was kindly maintained for several years by Russell F. Mizell, III. The holotype is dissected into many parts under 3 coverslips; missing are scape of one antenna as well as F5–F5 of the other antenna, and also one hind wing. Paratypes: USA: MICHIGAN, Ingham Co., Meridian Charter Township, Legg Park (near Birchwood), 42°41’37.3’’N 84°22’53.7’’W, 258 m, 14.viii.2015, T. Petrice (in canopy of Fraxinus americana) [2 ♀ on points, 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ on slides, UCRC]. NEW YORK, Seneca Co., 4.5 mi. SW of Lodi, Silver Thread Vineyard, 42°33’45.5’’N 76°52’27.2’’W, 202 m, 30.vii–14.viii.2010, G. Loeb, S.V. Triapitsyn [1 ♀ on slide, UCRC]. Description. FEMALE (holotype). Head very dark brown; scape and pedicel yellowish-light brown, flagellum brown; mesosoma almost white laterally, mesonotum brown except anterior scutellum light brown; legs yellowish, gaster dark brown. Antenna (Fig. 74) about as long as body, with scape (including radicle) about 2.9× as long as wide and smooth; pedicel slightly longer than F1; F1 the shortest funicle segment, F2 a little less than 6.0× as long as wide and the longest funicle segment, F4 almost as long as F3 and longer than F5; clava about 4.8× as long as wide, with 4 mps, a little shorter than combined length of F3–F5. Mesosoma about 1.5× as long as wide. Fore wing (Fig. 75) about 8.5× as long as wide; disc with a slight brownish tinge and a complete row of 20 setae closer to anterior margin besides the admarginal rows; longest marginal seta 3.2× maximum wing width. Hind wing (Fig. 75) 17× as long as wide; disc more strongly infumate, with 1 row of setae closer to posterior margin; longest marginal seta 6.0× maximum wing width. Ovipositor (Fig. 77) longer than body, strongly exserted beyond apex of gaster (by about 0.5× its own total length), occupying its entire length, and 3.3× length of metatibia. Measurements (µm) of the holotype. Body (measurement taken from the dry specimen prior to slidemounting) 347; gaster 326; ovipositor 571. Antenna: scape (including radicle) 70; pedicel 42; F1 38; F2 63; F3 52; F4 51; F5 45; clava 132. Fore wing 507:60; longest marginal seta 179. Hind wing 510:30; longest marginal seta 194. Variation (slide-mounted paratypes except when indicated otherwise). Body length (dry-mounted, critical point dried specimens) 460–480 µm. Scape (including radicle) 3.4× as long as wide; pedicel about as long as F1; clava 3.6–5.1× as long as wide. Fore wing 8.1–8.6× as long as wide; disc with a complete row of 20–22 setae closer to anterior admarginal row (occasionally an additional seta present just behind the complete row of setae, near apex); longest marginal seta 2.9× maximum wing width. Hind wing with longest marginal seta 5.9× maximum wing width. Ovipositor 2.8–3.0× length of metatibia. MALE (paratype). Body length (slide-mounted specimen) 570 µm. Similar to female except for normal sexually dimorphic features and the following. Antenna (Fig. 80) with scape (including radicle) 2.8× as long as wide; all funicle segments longer than pedicel. Fore wing (Fig. 81) 7.8× as long as wide, disc with 3 or 4 additional setae behind the complete row of setae in the widest part; hind wing 17× as long as wide. Genitalia as in Fig. 78. Diagnosis. Female of A. klonx is characterized by a very long ovipositor, which is longer than body and exserted beyond the gastral apex by about 0.5× its total length and 2.8–3.3× length of metatibia, and also by the fore wing disc with a complete row of 20–22 setae closer to the anterior margin. In two similar Holarctic species with very long, notably exserted ovipositors, A. terebrans and A. longicaudatus, the former has the ovipositor shorter than body, 2.2–2.6× (but in the tentatively identified specimens from the USA 2.8–3.0×) length of metatibia, and exserted at most by about a third of its total length, whereas in the latter it is 3.7–3.9× length of metatibia and exserted by about 0.7× its own total length. Alaptus klonx, which has the mesosoma almost white laterally (Fig. 79), is definitely more similar to A. terebrans whose mesosoma is always brown laterally. Etymology. The species name is a noun in apposition and a combination of letters without any meaning. Hosts. Unknown.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesTravaux en français237 207